Derrick Hudson wrote:
| >
| > ... and I thought MS products would stop sucking as soon as they started
| > making vacuums.
|
| Is that a reference only us greybeards would understand? ;)
It's a play on the word "suck". If software sucks, its bad. If a
vacuum sucks, it is working.
-D
You co
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:02:21PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
| On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 19:49 +, Stephen Patterson wrote:
| > Jude DaShiell wrote:
| > > I hope you're writing about an excellent Microsoft heavy duty Shop Vac,
| > > because otherwise excellent and Microsoft never get that close in
|
On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 19:49 +, Stephen Patterson wrote:
> Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > I hope you're writing about an excellent Microsoft heavy duty Shop Vac,
> > because otherwise excellent and Microsoft never get that close in
> > reality otherwise.
>
> ... and I thought MS products would stop s
According to Stephen Patterson,
> Jude DaShiell wrote:
> > I hope you're writing about an excellent Microsoft heavy duty Shop Vac,
> > because otherwise excellent and Microsoft never get that close in
> > reality otherwise.
>
> ... and I thought MS products would stop sucking as soon as they start
Jude DaShiell wrote:
> I hope you're writing about an excellent Microsoft heavy duty Shop Vac,
> because otherwise excellent and Microsoft never get that close in
> reality otherwise.
... and I thought MS products would stop sucking as soon as they started
making vacuums.
--
Stephen Patterson [
I hope you're writing about an excellent Microsoft heavy duty Shop Vac,
because otherwise excellent and Microsoft never get that close in reality
otherwise.
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005, Guy Koehler wrote:
Will someone please forward me the original document? Thanks. I
inadvertently deleted it before rea
6 matches
Mail list logo
