Am 2006-04-14 16:56:03, schrieb vatch23:
> hi, I`ve got an 2940UW in my sytem , but I cant boot Debian from it ,
> the installation goes perfect, everything is recognized, but reboot ,
> no-no-no! Can anyone help me
Sorry, I have lost my Crystalball...
How dou you have configured your 2940?
I ru
hi, I`ve got an 2940UW in my sytem , but I cant boot Debian from it ,
the installation goes perfect, everything is recognized, but reboot ,
no-no-no! Can anyone help me
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> yep..internal 50 & 68 and external 68 .. only 2 out of 3 of the connectors
> can be used at one time. its also good for overclocking(opposed to the
> 2940)
This is true of the 2940UW but not the newer 2940UW Pro. It can support all
three simultaneously. Only drawback is expense.
paul
--
Pa
aphro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 8 Dec 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
>
> a.genk >Gary, thanks a lot for your reply. I'd like to seek another advice
> a.genk >then. For what I'll be using the card, a simple SCSI2 card would
> a.genk >suffice just fine (I'll have 3 devices on it: CD-R, CDROM, and
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> [off-topic alert]
>
> Does it have internal 50-pin connector as well? I'm thinking of bying
> this card second-hand, and can't find this info on Adaptec's web-site.
Yep - it has 50 pin narrow and 68-pin wide (don't have one but I've se
On 8 Dec 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
a.genk >Gary, thanks a lot for your reply. I'd like to seek another advice
a.genk >then. For what I'll be using the card, a simple SCSI2 card would
a.genk >suffice just fine (I'll have 3 devices on it: CD-R, CDROM, and a
a.genk >scanner).
I believe the 2940UW (
On 8 Dec 1999, Gary Hennigan wrote:
glhenn >My only complaint isn't with the 2940UW, but with the UW spec
glhenn >itself. It's pretty finicky about things like cable-length and
glhenn >termination. Quite a pain to keep it within spec.
yeah, best to have at least 1 drive on each cable that support
On 8 Dec 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
a.genk >Does it have internal 50-pin connector as well? I'm thinking of bying
a.genk >this card second-hand, and can't find this info on Adaptec's web-site.
yep..internal 50 & 68 and external 68 .. only 2 out of 3 of the connectors
can be used at one time. its
On 8 Dec 1999, Arcady Genkin wrote:
[ snip ]
: So, which way should I go:
:
: - save a few bucks and get a 2940U (which will be sufficient
: speed-wise)
Given this choice in your situation I'd get the 2940U
: I'm being a bit paranoid, because I can't use my current SCSI card
: with a C
"Gary Hennigan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My only complaint isn't with the 2940UW, but with the UW spec
> itself. It's pretty finicky about things like cable-length and
> termination. Quite a pain to keep it within spec.
Gary, thanks a lot for your reply. I'd like to seek another advice
then.
Arcady Genkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does it have internal 50-pin connector as well? I'm thinking of bying
> this card second-hand, and can't find this info on Adaptec's
> web-site.
Yes, if it's a 2940UW it has 3 connectors: an internal wide connector,
an internal narrow connector and an ex
On Fri, 21 Mar 1997, Lawrence Chim wrote:
> > I've got 9 or 10 of these cards deployed. All of the machines are running
> > 2.0.29 without a single problem. I've never done anything more than plug
> > the card in, turn the machine on and install. No special tweaking
> > required.
> >
>
> What
> I've got 9 or 10 of these cards deployed. All of the machines are running
> 2.0.29 without a single problem. I've never done anything more than plug
> the card in, turn the machine on and install. No special tweaking
> required.
>
What device(s) did you use on the card?
Lawrence,
On Thu, 20 Mar 1997, Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
> I found a statement in the december RedHat (4.1?)
> claiming that some, but not all Adaptec have problems
> since 2.0.12.
Hogwash.
I've got 9 or 10 of these cards deployed. All of the machines are running
2.0.29 without a single problem. I've never
On Tue, 11 Mar 1997, Bernd Kreimeier wrote:
> I simply tried creating a 2.0.0 kernel image and pasting it with "dd"
> on the Debian rescue disk, attempting to replace the kernel image
> while leaving the root image intact. IIRC 350K is the size limit
> for the kernel image. My attempts failed, the
From: Jason Gunthorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> If I recall the rescue disk is simply a msdos disk with a custom boot
> loader? Meaning mount the disk and copy your kernel image to it.
It is an msdos filesystem, and the kernel is in the file "linux". The root
filesystem is a gzip-compressed Minix RAM
Bernd Kreimeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The hardware works fine with 1.3.88 up to 2.0.0. It does not work
> with 2.0.25 and 2.0.27 under my current installation, and with
> the Debian Base rescue disk. "0 SCSI hosts detected". I do not have
> a clue, but my hunch is that Adaptec sells boards
>FWIW, I use a 2940UW as well, and all the troubles that I have had
>that I thought were device or kernel problems, turned out to actually
>be bad cabling and/or termination.
The hardware works fine with 1.3.88 up to 2.0.0. It does not work
with 2.0.25 and 2.0.27 under my current installation, a
"Susan G. Kleinmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> interaction of these things (along with imperfections in the kernel) has
> caused the system to hang in the past, but I didn't do enough testing
> to tell you which part was at fault.
FWIW, I use a 2940UW as well, and all the troubles that I have
Hi Bernd --
You said:
> The current resque disk does not work with my Adaptec 2940 UW. This does
> not surprise me, as none of the Kernels above 2.0.12 (up to 2.0.27)
> I tried did work. An small remark in a README in an otherwise useless
> RedHat stated that Adaptec support is partially broken s
20 matches
Mail list logo
