Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Paul Morgan
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 23:05:13 -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: >> I swear to Christ, when I was in France, I said to myself: PLEASE GOD >> PLEASE get me back to my land of 500 channels of pa

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-20 Thread Nano Nano
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:11:13AM -0800, Troy Truchon wrote: > Heck america isn't even english only, despite what many claim. Sadly I never > learned quebecois as my father never picked it up. It never was. Back in the 1700s the most common language was German. Today the "official" languages of

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-20 Thread Troy Truchon
Strop Alexander wrote: > > > Hi Pierre, > > Bitte in Englisch schreiben, da ich kein Franzoesisch kann. ;-)) > > Translation: Please write in English, because i can't read any french. > Maybe we can help you then. > > Alex > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Pierre-François Gando

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread David P James
On February 20, 2004 02:05, Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: > > I swear to Christ, when I was in France, I said to myself: PLEASE > > GOD PLEASE get me back to my land of 500 channels of pablum, my

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 02:40:55AM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: > those books, I didn't see any superiority between any culture in terms > of maths, or types of maths. Mathematics is one in the sense that it describes the same reality. The approach to it may be different. No claim of superiority. Onl

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Nano Nano
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 05:27:02AM -0500, Antonio Rodriguez wrote: > I have heard that joke too. There is a similarity between the Russian > technology and the French technology. The west was surprised when the > Russians put the sputnik in the skies. When taken care of can be > amazingly powerful

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-20 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:05:13PM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > Reminds me of a self-deprecating joke I heard in Canada once. "Canada > could have been good. It could have had British culture, French > cuisine and American technology. Instead, it got American culture, > British cuisine and Fren

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 12:35:59PM -0800, Nano Nano wrote: > I swear to Christ, when I was in France, I said to myself: PLEASE GOD > PLEASE get me back to my land of 500 channels of pablum, my 24-hour > Walmart, my drivethroughs, my land of fakeness

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 01:12:25PM -0700, CW Harris wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:14:36AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:02:53PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > > > Nice of you not to mention the {W} really embarrassing s

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY WAY WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Michael W Thelen
* Arnt Karlsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-19 14:49]: > On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:07:21 -0800, > Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Paul Johnson wrote: [ ... snip lots of U.S. politics ... ] Just thought I would add a few WAYs to the subject line. -- Mike

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:07:21 -0800, Steve Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > Well, like I said, I fear it might not be a movie, but what's on > > Northwest Cable News. > > Sad part is people said the same about Clinton. I wasn't old enough

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Nano Nano
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 10:39:44AM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from Marty Landman: > > At 02:37 PM 2/18/2004, s. keeling wrote: > > > > >Of course, there's a lot of people from where I'm from who would dispute > > >the suggestion that English is spoken anywhere in the US. > > > > Heh. Ju

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread CW Harris
On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:14:36AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:02:53PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > > Nice of you not to mention the {W} really embarrassing stuff. :) > > That's OK. It's 2004. The people will vote their own regime change > soon enough. I fear W may

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Steve Lamb
Paul Johnson wrote: > Well, like I said, I fear it might not be a movie, but what's on > Northwest Cable News. Sad part is people said the same about Clinton. I wasn't old enough to care if the same was said about Bush, Reagan or Carter before him. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm yo

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:32:41PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > >I fear W may be a petty tyrant and refuse to step down, however. > > Hah, funny. Nice plot idea for Arnold Schwarzenegger's next film, huh? Well, like I said, I fear it might not be a

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Marty Landman
At 02:14 PM 2/19/2004, Paul Johnson wrote: The people will vote their own regime change soon enough. From your mouth to God's ear, Paul. I fear W may be a petty tyrant and refuse to step down, however. Hah, funny. Nice plot idea for Arnold Schwarzenegger's next film, huh? Marty Landman Face 2

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 02:02:53PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > Nice of you not to mention the {W} really embarrassing stuff. :) That's OK. It's 2004. The people will vote their own regime change soon enough. I fear W may be a petty tyrant and ref

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread Marty Landman
At 12:39 PM 2/19/2004, s. keeling wrote: Incoming from Marty Landman: > > Heh. Just shows how jealous they all are of what we've managed to do with > it since taking it over 200+ years ago. :) As in KMart, Kwikee-Mart, Walmart, KTel, garnished [sic] wages, and PATRIOT Act? :-P "Doh!" Nice of you

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-19 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Marty Landman: > At 02:37 PM 2/18/2004, s. keeling wrote: > > >Of course, there's a lot of people from where I'm from who would dispute > >the suggestion that English is spoken anywhere in the US. > > Heh. Just shows how jealous they all are of what we've managed to do with > it s

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread Marty Landman
At 02:37 PM 2/18/2004, s. keeling wrote: Marty called him on it and noted English is not necessary in Brooklyn, a subset of the US, thereby disproving Paul's assumption. Provided we really consider Brooklyn a proper subset of the US; this was still the subject of much heated debate at the time I

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:37:06PM -0700, s. keeling wrote: > Ah. You're mixing up "subset" and "superset." Paul said you can't > make it in the US, which includes the subset Brooklyn. Take all the major multilingual cities combined and it still com

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-18 Thread Marty Landman
At 02:23 PM 2/18/2004, Steve Lamb wrote: Marty Landman wrote: At 01:01 PM 2/18/2004, Paul Johnson wrote: you just can't make it without English in the US. I don't know about that Paul; growing up in Brooklyn seemed to me like everyone did quite nicely thank you. I was unaware that Brooklyn was

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Lamb
s. keeling wrote: When I read Marty's reply, it seemed more a play on the idea that Brooklyn-ites don't actually speak English. Of course, there's a lot of people from where I'm from who would dispute the suggestion that English is spoken anywhere in the US. I imagine the British might go even fa

Re: AW: Bonjour - WAY WAY OT!

2004-02-18 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from Steve Lamb: > Marty Landman wrote: > >At 01:01 PM 2/18/2004, Paul Johnson wrote: > >>you just can't make it without English in the US. > >I don't know about that Paul; growing up in Brooklyn seemed to me like > >everyone did quite nicely thank you. > > I was unaware that Brookly

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-18 Thread Steve Lamb
Marty Landman wrote: At 01:01 PM 2/18/2004, Paul Johnson wrote: you just can't make it without English in the US. I don't know about that Paul; growing up in Brooklyn seemed to me like everyone did quite nicely thank you. I was unaware that Brooklyn was considered the whole of the United Stat

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-18 Thread Brett Carrington
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 10:01:03AM -0800, Paul Johnson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:11:13AM -0800, Troy Truchon wrote: > > Heck america isn't even english only, despite what many claim. Sadly I never > > learned quebecois as my father neve

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-18 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 01:53:10PM -0500, Marty Landman wrote: > >you just can't make it without English in the US. > > I don't know about that Paul; growing up in Brooklyn seemed to me like > everyone did quite nicely thank you. Right, but not ever

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-18 Thread Marty Landman
At 01:01 PM 2/18/2004, Paul Johnson wrote: you just can't make it without English in the US. I don't know about that Paul; growing up in Brooklyn seemed to me like everyone did quite nicely thank you. Marty Landman Face 2 Interface Inc 845-679-9387 This Month's New Quiz --- Past Superbowl Winn

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-18 Thread Paul Johnson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 08:11:13AM -0800, Troy Truchon wrote: > Heck america isn't even english only, despite what many claim. Sadly I never > learned quebecois as my father never picked it up. Mostly because they dropped English literacy for some biz

Re: AW: Bonjour

2004-02-18 Thread Troy Truchon
Strop Alexander wrote: > > > Hi Pierre, > > Bitte in Englisch schreiben, da ich kein Franzoesisch kann. ;-)) > > Translation: Please write in English, because i can't read any french. > Maybe we can help you then. > > Alex > > > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Pierre-François Gando