-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well let's try.
$ cd ~/fglrx-driver-debian-package/fglrx-driver-11-5
$ debuild
This will take some time, but it will produce the .debs in
~/fglrx-driver-debian-package. Please post any errors you may encounter.
If there are none, my congratulations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
dch is basically an editor for debian/changelog.
Can you edit this file by hand and remove the '*' line?
- --
Best regards,
Panayiotis Karabassis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Moz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
You don't need root priviliges to build a debian package. Use chown to
change the owner of fglrx-driver-debian-package and contents. If your
username is lina:
$ sudo chown -R lina:lina ~/fglrx-driver-debian-package
Please use dch to remove the 1:11-4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Step 4: Update the changelog
-
a) Install the package devscripts.
$ sudo apt-get install devscripts
b) Tell devscripts who you are:
$ export DEBEMAIL="${YOUR_EMAIL}"
$ export DEBFULLNAME="${YOUR_FULL_NAME}"
You can put t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Step 3 : Upgrade the package with an upstream (ATI) release.
-
We are going to update the package to 11-5 from ATI.
$ cd ~/fglrx-driver-debian-package/fglrx-driver-11-4
$ DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2011 05:11 PM, lina wrote:
> I am not sure in which directory,
Not important.
> :/var/local/cache/apt-build/buildATI/fglrx-driver-11-4/debian# apt-get
> build-dep fglrx-driver
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Haha, you almost got it.
The short version:
apt-get -t unstable source fglrx-driver
But you need the deb-src line in your sources.list. See my previous
message. Also please forget about dch for now, we need to do something
else first. My mistake!
W
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2011 01:25 PM, lina wrote:
> # ls fglrx-driver_11-4
> fglrx-driver_11-4-2.debian.tar.gz fglrx-driver_11-4.orig.tar.bz2
> fglrx-driver_11-4-2.dsc
>
> and then?
You should have (if you ran apt-get source) or must create - by
extracting the .t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/14/2011 07:07 AM, lina wrote:
> :/etc/apt# more sources.list
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian sid main contrib non-free
> deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org wheezy main non-free
deb http://ftp.it.debian.org/debian/ sid main contrib non-f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2011 08:12 PM, lina wrote:
> I am not a smart person at all.
Don't say that!!! Rather I suck at explaining! :-)
> I failed to catch the meaning of
> "modify it to reflect Stable's requirements", can you tell me a bit
> slowly.
Basically mod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2011 07:46 PM, lina wrote:
> That's very nice of you. If you'd like I wish you can tell me how to
> package it next time when it come out. I mean, the step.
1. You basically download the latest package source from Debian, say
Testing. You mod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/13/2011 07:35 PM, lina wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Do you still remember that one month ago you suggested me to post
> again in the middle of Jun about whether there is new version of ATI
> driver come out?
>
> in case you forget about the topic we talked
--- On Fri, 11/28/08, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Eduardo M KALINOWSKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Ati driver stopped working after update
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Received: Friday, November 28, 2008, 12:58 PM
mk escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> Yesterday, I updated my flgrx drivers on Lenny, using synaptics. Now, the
> driver doesn't work. I had to go back to radeonhd driver to be able to use
> the system. Has anyone experienced similar glitches? Could anyone suggest a
> solution to this problem?
> Before the
Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>> Since you are using a self compiled kernel could it be you built the
>> radeon support into it?
>> Look for DRM_RADEON in your kernel config file.
>>
> Here is the relevant setting:
>
> CON
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:37:21PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Since you are using a self compiled kernel could it be you built the
> radeon support into it?
> Look for DRM_RADEON in your kernel config file.
>
Here is the relevant setting:
CONFIG_DRM=y
# CONFIG_DRM_TDFX is not s
Since you are using a self compiled kernel could it be you built the
radeon support into it?
Look for DRM_RADEON in your kernel config file.
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 07:46:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> Like most other utilities, modprobe has a --verbose qualifier. Now,
> maybe it won't print anything more than what you now see, but maybe
> it will. Always use the --verbose qualifier.
>
You are right. It did not gi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/13/07 19:14, Sridhar M.A. wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
[snip]
> # modprobe fglrx
> FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/2.6.19-mas/misc/fglrx.ko):
> Operation not permitted
Like most other uti
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:11:08PM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
> Could it be that the radeon module is still loaded?
> What is the output of /sbin/lsmod ?
>
# lsmod
Module Size Used by
thermal14472 0
fan 4996 0
button
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> Feb 13 06:54:40 kernel: [fglrx:firegl_init_module] *ERROR*
> firegl_stub_register failed
> FATAL: Error inserting fglrx (/lib/modules/2.6.19-mas/misc/fglrx.ko):
> Operation not permitted
...
Could it be that the radeon module is still loaded?
What is the output of /sb
Mike & Erik
You guys rocks ! Thank you so much. I simply had to translate to zsh ;-P
Mathieu
On 8/9/06, Erik Steffl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mitch wrote:
> On 08/09/06 00:12 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Has anyone tried the new ati driver installer. Here is what I did:
>>
>
Mitch wrote:
On 08/09/06 00:12 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried the new ati driver installer. Here is what I did:
Well now all I get is: Mesa GLX Indirect (*). Is there a step that I
am missing ?
I use those drivers on two machines. I build my modules with make-kpkg,
On 08/09/06 00:12 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Has anyone tried the new ati driver installer. Here is what I did:
>
> Well now all I get is: Mesa GLX Indirect (*). Is there a step that I
> am missing ?
>
I use those drivers on two machines. I build my modules with make-kpkg,
but
Hi,
I'm new to linux, by the way I managed to install the driver for my ati
videocard(Ati radeon 9550 128mb), but I still cannot change the resolution
to anything higher than 800*600.
Look at /var/log/XFree86.0.log. If necessary post it here.
Florian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Sounds like what the doctor ordered. Read over the man page but do not
understand which commands to use. I want to install the
xlibmesa-gl1-dri-mach64 or the flgr equivalent without having apt-get remove
half my system :-).
On Monday 29 March 2004 09:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Actually the
On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 05:42, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> After installing the ATI fglrx driver and modifying the xlibmesa-gl-dev
> package not to depend on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl, each time I
> want to dist-upgrade, a new version of xlibmesa-gl-dev is to be
> installed and apt wants to remove
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 12:42:28PM +0200, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> After installing the ATI fglrx driver and modifying the xlibmesa-gl-dev
> package not to depend on a specific version of xlibmesa-gl, each time I
> want to dist-upgrade, a new version of xlibmesa-gl-dev is to be
> installed and apt wan
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:19:08PM +0100, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:52:52 +
> Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (EE) fglrx(0): [agp] unable to acquire AGP, error "xf86_ENOMEM"
> > (EE) fglrx(0): cannot init AGP
> > (II) fglrx(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context fo
On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 01:47:40PM -0800, Erik Steffl wrote:
> Antony Gelberg wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I'm trying to move from the OS radeon driver to the ATI fglrx one, to
> >get better 3D support. I've built the module and installed it, but 3D
> >performance is no better. fglrxinfo says:
> >
>
Antony Gelberg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to move from the OS radeon driver to the ATI fglrx one, to
get better 3D support. I've built the module and installed it, but 3D
performance is no better. fglrxinfo says:
display: :0.0 screen: 0
OpenGL vendor string: Mesa project: www.mesa3d.org
I thin
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 20:52:52 +
Antony Gelberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (EE) fglrx(0): [agp] unable to acquire AGP, error "xf86_ENOMEM"
> (EE) fglrx(0): cannot init AGP
> (II) fglrx(0): [drm] removed 1 reserved context for kernel
> (II) fglrx(0): [drm] unmapping 8192 bytes of SAREA 0xe0996000
Antony Gelberg wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to move from the OS radeon driver to the ATI fglrx one, to
get better 3D support. I've built the module and installed it, but 3D
performance is no better. fglrxinfo says:
Why? I get 25% better performance with DRI drivers on my Radeon 9000.
-Roberto
p
Hi yall,
well, I fixed problem two, by checking the syntax closely, of the
"make.sh" file & found the drm file name it was looking for & then
included the path to that file in the "drmincludes=/"
This location, was effected by using Trunk-dri stuff from the dri
sourcforge
Progress.
Hi all & Nikita,
thanx man, it fixed that problem, by installing the "headers" & then
pointing make.sh to them, only to produce a new error message
Error:
XFree86 drm includes at
/usr/src/kernel-headers-2.4.18-bf2.4/include/../drivers/char/drm do not
fit this driver.
This driver is desig
#include
* Nikita V. Youshchenko [Fri, Nov 22 2002, 11:15:24AM]:
> > kernel includes at /usr/src/linux/include not found or incomplete
> > file: /usr/src/linux/include/linux/version.h
> > haralambos:/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod#
> >
>
> The mentioned file is auto-generated on kernel build.
> So
>
> Hi yall,
>
> I am trying to install the new ATI stuff & get the following error
> message
>
>
> haralambos:/lib/modules/fglrx/build_mod# ./make.sh
> ATI module generator V 2.0
> ==
> kernel includes at /usr/src/linux/include not found or incomplete
> file: /usr/s
37 matches
Mail list logo
