On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 08:28:45AM -0600, user list wrote:
> Reading with mutt makes me less likely to do the cut and paste. Anyway,
> if the link to which you refer is
Funny, works for me.
apt-get install urlview.
--
My last cigarette was roughly 36 days, 13 hours, 55 minutes ago.
Y
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 02:28, user list wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:48:30PM +1200, James Kahn wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 14:02, user list wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:55:32AM +1200, James Kahn wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 08:52, Mike Frisch wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, M
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:48:30PM +1200, James Kahn wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 14:02, user list wrote:
> > On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:55:32AM +1200, James Kahn wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 08:52, Mike Frisch wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:29:58PM -0500, Brandt Dusthimer wrote:
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 14:02, user list wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:55:32AM +1200, James Kahn wrote:
> > On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 08:52, Mike Frisch wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:29:58PM -0500, Brandt Dusthimer wrote:
> > > > Hrm... so your saying that there is no support for the 7500
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:55:32AM +1200, James Kahn wrote:
> On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 08:52, Mike Frisch wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:29:58PM -0500, Brandt Dusthimer wrote:
> > > Hrm... so your saying that there is no support for the 7500 in 4.1?
> >
> > http://www.xfree86.org/4.1.0/Status6
On Fri, 2002-05-24 at 08:52, Mike Frisch wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:29:58PM -0500, Brandt Dusthimer wrote:
> > Hrm... so your saying that there is no support for the 7500 in 4.1?
>
> http://www.xfree86.org/4.1.0/Status6.html
>
> Apparently there's no accelerated X server support in 4.1.0
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 03:29:58PM -0500, Brandt Dusthimer wrote:
> Hrm... so your saying that there is no support for the 7500 in 4.1?
http://www.xfree86.org/4.1.0/Status6.html
Apparently there's no accelerated X server support in 4.1.0.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
Hrm... so your saying that there is no support for the 7500 in 4.1?
Brandt Dusthimer
--
:%s/emacs/vi/g
On Wed, 2002-05-22 at 09:53, Andreas Eichner wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2002 06:00 schrieb user list:
>
> > 2. Has anyone had success with an ATI radeon 7000 card with 4.2?
> >
YES!!!
Thanks very much. When I got the debian packages working I found out that I
have a Radeon 8500. It is working well enough. The gnome-terminal seg-faults,
but I think that's because it's still the xf86 4.1 version. Does anyone know
where there's a 4.2 gnome-terminal package? (or am I hoping
Am Mittwoch, 22. Mai 2002 06:00 schrieb user list:
> 2. Has anyone had success with an ATI radeon 7000 card with 4.2?
> If the answer is yes, is there a debian package for 4.2, or should I
> compile it from source?
As you stated in an earlier mail, you have an Radeon 7500 (or was this
someone el
Thanks for the reply. I did try the ati driver but I'm guessing that
the card is actually a Radeon 7500 or higher. I'll be able to determine
that today.
Again, thanks.
Art
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 03:06:54PM +0200, Vaclav Hula wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:00:36PM -0600, user list wrote:
>
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:00:36PM -0600, user list wrote:
> I've now discovered that even
> in unstable, xfree86 is at version 4.1. I'm looking to use 4.2 because,
> stupidly, I bought an ATI radeon 7000. According to Xfree86, it's supported.
> However, I was unable to get it recognized. So, my qu
FAQ. http://people.debian.org/~branden/
On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 10:00:36PM -0600, user list wrote:
> I've now discovered that even
> in unstable, xfree86 is at version 4.1. I'm looking to use 4.2 because,
> stupidly, I bought an ATI radeon 7000. According to Xfree86, it's supported.
> However, I w
13 matches
Mail list logo
