Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Ismael Valladolid Torres
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 16:04, Jason Chambers escribe: > ACPI is the newer technology and can do more than APM. However it is still > experimental, especially in 2.4 kernels. The Debian kernels don't > include the later ACPI patch which can improve matters. Emma Jane Hogbin > wr

Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Jason Chambers
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 03:55:59PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe: > > "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are > >configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used." > > I suspected this.

Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Ismael Valladolid Torres
El lunes, 8 de septiembre de 2003, a las 13:51, Jason Chambers escribe: > "If both ACPI and Advanced Power Management (APM) support are >configured, whichever is loaded first shall be used." I suspected this. Which option do you think is better? I am supposing that is ACPI, as it should be a

Re: APM versus ACPI

2003-09-08 Thread Jason Chambers
On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 06:19:55PM +0200, Ismael Valladolid Torres wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if I can use simultaneously apmd (with APM support enabled in > my kernel) and acpid (with ACPI support enabled in my kernel), and > whether this is useful, or ACPI superseedes APM in any way. > You can