Re: A new install guide

2000-09-14 Thread Christopher W. Aiken
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:04:58PM -0500, Will Trillich wrote: -|On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:09:16PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: -|> Ooopss. I mistaked again of list. Sorry. -|> -|> Anybody can help? When using mutt and hitting reply in a message from -|> a mailing list it sets the to: field to the

Re: A new install guide

2000-09-14 Thread USM Bish
Don't know if this is the recommended way, but sure it is the easiest and most effective way. After the initial questions you are placed in the edit mode of your specified editor (vi by default) by mutt. At that point just go to the second line where "To: " is written and edit the addressee.

Re: A new install guide

2000-09-14 Thread Will Trillich
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:09:16PM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: > Ooopss. I mistaked again of list. Sorry. > > Anybody can help? When using mutt and hitting reply in a message from > a mailing list it sets the to: field to the person who wrote it... How > can I change this behavivour to make it sent

Re: A new install guide

2000-09-14 Thread Julio Merino
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 11:58:20AM +0200, Julio Merino wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:24:52PM -0500, Neal H Walfield wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I have developed a new install guide as the easy guide has become >

Re: A new install guide

2000-09-14 Thread Julio Merino
Ooopss. I mistaked again of list. Sorry. Anybody can help? When using mutt and hitting reply in a message from a mailing list it sets the to: field to the person who wrote it... How can I change this behavivour to make it sent to the mailing list instead to the other author ? Thanks. On Thu, Sep

Re: A new install guide

2000-09-14 Thread Julio Merino
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 10:32:17AM +0100, Matthew Vernon wrote: > Neal H Walfield writes: > > Hi All, > > > > I have developed a new install guide as the easy guide has become > > quite out of date. This one was written in the texinfo format so it is > > Hm. I've been working on some updat