smbclient != sambaclient
Oh, I am an idiot. Thanks for the replies.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/871v2igr7m@ulanbator.myhome.westell.com
On 08/03/11 03:53, R. Clayton wrote:
> I'm running a debian testing system updated weekly. In the last update I
> noticed samba packages being updated. Because I have no need of samba, I
> wanted to get rid of them:
>
> $ sudo dpkg --purge samba-common samba-common-bin
> dpkg: dependency pr
On 03/07/2011 10:53 AM, R. Clayton wrote:
I'm running a debian testing system updated weekly. In the last update I
noticed samba packages being updated. Because I have no need of samba, I
wanted to get rid of them:
$ sudo dpkg --purge samba-common samba-common-bin
dpkg: dependency proble
On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 11:53:00 -0500, rvclay...@verizon.net (R. Clayton) wrote:
>
> Thus the puzzle: how is it that a package that's not installed prevents an
> installed package from being purged?
smbclient != sambaclient
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Mon Mar 07, 2011 at 11:53:00 -0500, R. Clayton wrote:
> I'm running a debian testing system updated weekly. In the last update I
> noticed samba packages being updated. Because I have no need of samba, I
> wanted to get rid of them:
>
> $ sudo dpkg --purge samba-common samba-common-bin
>
5 matches
Mail list logo