Re: A RH package won't work on Debian

2001-11-10 Thread Paul Smith
%% Paul 'Baloo' Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Thanks for the note... pj> On 9 Nov 2001, Paul Smith wrote: >> Subject: A RH package won't work on Debian pj> This is normal. It's a bug on Red Hat's side, as RH packages rarely pj> work right on RH. Hey, you're preaching to the conve

Re: A RH package won't work on Debian

2001-11-09 Thread Craig Dickson
Michael P. Soulier wrote: > *snicker* > > Q. What does RedHat call their unstable tree? > A. A .0 release. I thought they called it Red Hat Linux. Craig

Re: A RH package won't work on Debian

2001-11-09 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 08:14:45PM -0800, Paul 'Baloo' Johnson wrote: > On 9 Nov 2001, Paul Smith wrote: > > > Subject: A RH package won't work on Debian > > This is normal. It's a bug on Red Hat's side, as RH packages rarely > work right on RH. *snicker* Q. What does RedHat call thei

Re: A RH package won't work on Debian

2001-11-09 Thread Paul 'Baloo' Johnson
On 9 Nov 2001, Paul Smith wrote: > Subject: A RH package won't work on Debian This is normal. It's a bug on Red Hat's side, as RH packages rarely work right on RH. > I borrowed a laptop with vanilla RH 6.2, and brought it home, and it > works fine. Also if I boot my system into Windows and use