Leen Besselink wrote:
> You know, I don't think you can swap something like netfilter
> rules/information/counters/whatever...
>
> I'm not sure how much kernel-'memory' can actually be swapped at all.
>
> so this might be the problem.
that's the problem: the kernel is not swapable (only NT trie
> > On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:52:41 +0200 (CEST), Leen Besselink
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I set up a router with my old 486 computer. I have there potato witch
> > >> kernel
> > >> 2.4 installed.
> > >>
> > >try running 2.2 or 2.0 instead, that might help also.
> >
> > In a router, havi
Marc Haber wrote:
>
> On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:52:41 +0200 (CEST), Leen Besselink
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I set up a router with my old 486 computer. I have there potato witch
> >> kernel
> >> 2.4 installed.
> >>
> >try running 2.2 or 2.0 instead, that might help also.
>
> In a router, h
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 12:11:04AM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
>
> >Just a few random checks that come to mind:
> > * what is the chip controlling the serial port to the ISDN modem? Is it
> > an 8250 or a 16650? I seem to remember that the 8250 were not very good
> > but I don't remember
>Just a few random checks that come to mind:
> * what is the chip controlling the serial port to the ISDN modem? Is it
> an 8250 or a 16650? I seem to remember that the 8250 were not very good
> but I don't remember when they stopped using them.
> * check the serial port configuration. What
On Sun, 10 Jun 2001 01:52:41 +0200 (CEST), Leen Besselink
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I set up a router with my old 486 computer. I have there potato witch kernel
>> 2.4 installed.
>>
>try running 2.2 or 2.0 instead, that might help also.
In a router, having 2.4 has a _very_ strong point calle
> I set up a router with my old 486 computer. I have there potato witch kernel
> 2.4 installed.
>
try running 2.2 or 2.0 instead, that might help also.
As someone who has nothing of my own to offer, I do recall reading of a
similar (if not identical) problem a few months ago. Seems the cause of
the slowdown was that the NIC needed to work half duplex rather than
full duplex. Reconfiguring to half duplex brought the speed back up to
expected rate
What are you using for a connection to your ISDN? Internal card, external TA
with hi speed serial, etc? I'm wondering if the serial interface is setup
wrong.
Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Normally i have have rates of 7.8 kb/s (ISDN) throughput. But if i try it
> over my new router the rate is no
Forrest English <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> a 486 33 should be fine, and able to handle up to about 700KBps, the limit
> of the isa bus.
Hmmm... there would still be a high CPU cost. And for routing, you'd
have two cards, so if that 700Kbps is the max speed of the bus,
wouldn't you only be abl
a 486 33 should be fine, and able to handle up to about 700KBps, the limit
of the isa bus.
or so i belive anyhow.
--
Forrest English
http://truffula.net
"When we have nothing left to give
There will be no reason for us to live
But when we have nothing left to lose
You will have nothing left to u
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 05:01:55PM +0200, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
| Hi all
|
| I set up a router with my old 486 computer. I have there potato witch kernel
| 2.4 installed.
|
| Normally i have have rates of 7.8 kb/s (ISDN) throughput. But if i try it
| over my new router the rate is not more t
Raffaele Sandrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any hints to speed that up?
Not really, but you could try out fli4l, which is a floppy-disk
router. I've set up a router with it, and it works fine.
Have a look at http://www.fli4l.de
Ciao!
juh
--
Die Welt aus Sicht eines Abderiten
http://www.s
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I set up a router with my old 486 computer. I have there potato witch kernel
> 2.4 installed.
>
> Normally i have have rates of 7.8 kb/s (ISDN) throughput. But if i try it
> over my new router the rate is not more than 2 kb/s. Is it pos
Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> I set up a router with my old 486 computer [potato, kernel 2.4]
>
> Normally i have have rates of 7.8 kb/s (ISDN) throughput. But if i try it
> over my new router the rate is not more than 2 kb/s. Is it possible that the
> Masquerading process takes too much recources
I had a similar problem that manifested itself in virtually
stopping all network traffic if there is any activity on
the dialup-masq server (Pentium 100, 24Mb and plenty other services running)
The reason was that any HD activity stopped interrupts and serial port stopped.
The solution was to unma
I find it very unlikely that the 486 CPU should be a limiting factor.
If your ISDN modem is connected to an old (not UART 16650) serial
port, that may be a problem.
I had a similar problem when I ran ISDN. It finally turned out that I had
ATDT
in the call up script. Where it should have been.
17 matches
Mail list logo
