From: Sven Joachim [mailto:svenj...@gmx.de]
> > On 2013-01-24 17:51 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim
> > wrote:
> > >>> I have crossgraded some packages in i386 chroots that way, but in
the
> > >>>
On 2013-01-24 17:51 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Kelly Clowers wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>>
>>> I have crossgraded some packages in i386 chroots that way, but in the
>>> current state of affairs I would definitely _not_ dare to tr
On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Kelly Clowers wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> I have crossgraded some packages in i386 chroots that way, but in the
>> current state of affairs I would definitely _not_ dare to try a full
>> crossgrade on my main system with almost 20
On 2013-01-24 16:58 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
> The third bit is the hard part. I am wondering if I should go from lucid to
> precise first, or do the 32/64-bit trick first. Or is there a way to do
> both at once?
With dpkg from lucid or precise you're out of luck anyway. The former
is not mult
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 7:58 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
>
>
> The third bit is the hard part. I am wondering if I should go from lucid to
> precise first, or do the 32/64-bit trick first. Or is there a way to do
> both at once? If I package it into a virtual machine instance, first, then I
> can snap
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> There are two problems with that:
>
> - Not all packages have been multiarchified, including some important
> packages with many reverse dependencies like perl and python.
> Crossgrading those will leave you with many broken packages, at
From: Sven Joachim [mailto:svenj...@gmx.de]
> On 2013-01-24 14:51 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
>
> > Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that
is
> > feasible?
> >
> > I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness
within
> > the same basic framework
On 24/01/13 09:51 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2013-01-24 14:51 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
feasible?
I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
the same basic framework, within the same "ins
On 2013-01-24 14:51 +0100, Mark Allums wrote:
> Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
> feasible?
>
> I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
> the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go from
>
> 3
On 24/01/13 09:35 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
From: Gary Dale [mailto:garyd...@rogers.com]
I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness
within
the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go
from
32-bit kernel-arch + 32-bit userland =>
64-bit kernel-
> From: Gary Dale [mailto:garyd...@rogers.com]
> > I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness
within
> > the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go
from
> >
> > 32-bit kernel-arch + 32-bit userland =>
> > 64-bit kernel-arch + 32-bit userland =>
On 24/01/13 08:51 AM, Mark Allums wrote:
Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
feasible?
I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can I go from
32-bit kernel-arc
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 07:51:19AM -0600, Mark Allums wrote:
> Can one do this? Not: Is this easy, but merely: Is this something that is
> feasible?
>
> I have a 32-bit system that I would like to migrate into 64-bitness within
> the same basic framework, within the same "install". That is, can
13 matches
Mail list logo
