I see. Thanks.
On 6/10/05, Maurits van Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0800, hell0 un1verse wrote:
> > I found that the release was named "3.1_r0a". Just for curiosity, what
> > does that "a" mean?
>
> It simply means it is the first update to the 3.1_r0 rele
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>HI, a simple question here, when I wanted to download the netinst ISO
>image for Sarge at this address:
>http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso
>
>I found that the release was named "3.1_r0a". Just for curiosi
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0800, hell0 un1verse wrote:
> I found that the release was named "3.1_r0a". Just for curiosity, what
> does that "a" mean?
It simply means it is the first update to the 3.1_r0 release. It was
released just a day after the original release. There was a mistake in
Hello *,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 08:11:44PM +0800, hell0 un1verse wrote:
> HI, a simple question here, when I wanted to download the netinst ISO
> image for Sarge at this address:
> http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/3.1_r0a/i386/iso-cd/debian-31r0a-i386-netinst.iso
>
> I found that the release
On 6/8/05, Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> What's the difference between 3.1_r0 and 3.1_r0a?
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg3.html
Best regards,
Hannes.
Why you dont try the DVD images over Bittorrent? That would be much
better that download 14 CD images or not?
greetz
Dominik
On 6/8/05, Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 June 2005 01:14 pm, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > I've been trying with torrent, but can't get it to work,
On Wednesday 08 June 2005 01:14 pm, Hal Vaughan wrote:
> I've been trying with torrent, but can't get it to work, so I've been
> downloading cd images (several local friends need CDs since they have bad
> connections). Is it just me, or is there a problem with finding images for
> CDs 7 & 8 for 3.
On Wed, 08 Jun 2005 17:13:48 +0200
Hans du Plooy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:31 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > 3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images
> > that caused the installer to insert `testing' instead of sarge into
> > the sources.l
Hello *,
[ partially following your Reply-To ]
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 05:13:48PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:31 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > 3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images that
> > caused the installer to insert `testing' inst
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 09:31 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> 3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images that
> caused the installer to insert `testing' instead of sarge into the
> sources.list of a newly installed system. You really only need it if
> you are going to insta
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 03:26:07PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> What's the difference between 3.1_r0 and 3.1_r0a?
>
3.1r0a fixes a minor bug in the originally mastered CD/DVD images that
caused the installer to insert `testing' instead of sarge into the
sources.list of a newly inst
11 matches
Mail list logo
