Re: 24-bit graphics woes

1999-10-15 Thread Ed Cogburn
Bill wrote: > > I think the 24 bit colour problem is from one of the libraries Netscape > 4.6 (and WP 8) was compiled with. Do a search in the mail archive and > and in Deja for more info. It seems to be a problem only at 24 bit. The > other problem I've never seen before, maybe another netscape b

RE: 24-bit graphics woes

1999-10-15 Thread Bill
I think the 24 bit colour problem is from one of the libraries Netscape 4.6 (and WP 8) was compiled with. Do a search in the mail archive and and in Deja for more info. It seems to be a problem only at 24 bit. The other problem I've never seen before, maybe another netscape bug, I'm currently runni

Re: 24-bit graphics woes

1999-10-14 Thread John Foster
Stuart Ballard wrote: > > Bryan Allen wrote: > > > > You might want to check out xfree86.org, they've got spiffy infos on the > > supported cards. and yeah.. the 24 bit ugly netscape thing is netscape > > being ghetto and ugly in 24 bit. try jumping it up to 32bit as soon as you > > can. x is gene

Re: 24-bit graphics woes

1999-10-14 Thread Stuart Ballard
Bryan Allen wrote: > > You might want to check out xfree86.org, they've got spiffy infos on the > supported cards. and yeah.. the 24 bit ugly netscape thing is netscape > being ghetto and ugly in 24 bit. try jumping it up to 32bit as soon as you > can. x is generally a lot prettier when it's got t

Re: 24-bit graphics woes

1999-10-14 Thread Bryan Allen
You might want to check out xfree86.org, they've got spiffy infos on the supported cards. and yeah.. the 24 bit ugly netscape thing is netscape being ghetto and ugly in 24 bit. try jumping it up to 32bit as soon as you can. x is generally a lot prettier when it's got the color depth behind it. :)