Re: 2.2 kernel vs 2.4 kernel

2003-01-11 Thread Sam Rosenfeld
Thanks for all the responses to my query. s. On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 01:55:13PM +0100, Urs Thuermann wrote: > Sam Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What are the advantages (and disadvantages ) of Linux 2.4 compared > > with Linux 2.2? References will suffice. > > * netfilter/iptables

Re: 2.2 kernel vs 2.4 kernel

2003-01-11 Thread Eduard Bloch
Moin Urs! Urs Thuermann schrieb am Saturday, den 11. January 2003: > * Logical Volume Manager (LVM) * new generation MD driver (raid) > * File systems: ext3, reiserfs, tmpfs (RAM based FS that shares the > swap space), devfs (device file system) * JFS, cramfs for read-only-filesystems

Re: 2.2 kernel vs 2.4 kernel

2003-01-11 Thread Urs Thuermann
Sam Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What are the advantages (and disadvantages ) of Linux 2.4 compared > with Linux 2.2? References will suffice. * netfilter/iptables instead of ipchains: Better packet filtering, e.g. stateful filtering, many more matches on packets with lots of kern

Re: 2.2 kernel vs 2.4 kernel

2003-01-11 Thread Jeffrey L. Taylor
2.2 runs better than 2.4 on older hardware. The differences are relatively minor. The workload was a as a server. IIRC, it was on Slashdot. Here are some references, but not the one I was thinking of: http://www.nks.net/linux-vm.html http://bulmalug.net/body.phtml?nIdNoticia=642 http://cs.nmu.e

Re: 2.2 kernel vs 2.4 kernel

2003-01-10 Thread Mohammed Sameer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Once upon a time Sam Rosenfeld wrote @ Fri, 10 Jan 2003 16:31:15 -0500 > What are the advantages (and disadvantages ) of Linux 2.4 compared > with Linux 2.2? References will suffice. > > Thanks. > For me, The most important is the ext3 journalized

Re: 2.2 kernel vs. 2.4 kernel, please help!

2001-12-31 Thread nate
> I am trying to figure out what kernel I should use, for the next 6 > months at least anyway. Security is my main objective, most other > things can go to the wall if they conflict. > > But I would like my Nvidia card to work with a 2.2 kernel, and I > would like to be able to use cdrecord/xc

Re: 2.2 kernel vs. 2.4 kernel, please help!

2001-12-31 Thread Daniel Freedman
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002, Penguin wrote: > Debian website says 2.4 is not really mature enough yet, does this mean > mature enough security wise also? > > I am trying to figure out what kernel I should use, for the next 6 months at > least anyway. Security is my main objective, most other things can

Re: 2.2 kernel vs. 2.4 kernel, please help!

2001-12-31 Thread Thomas R. Shemanske
As far as XFree86 version 4.1, you can see http://people.debian.org/~cpbotha/xf410_potato/ Penguin wrote: Given that I am super paranoid, maybe my old Debian 2.2r2 Potato is the best bet for me. Is there any reason why I may not be able to upgrade X to XFree 4.1 with this version of Potat

Re: 2.2 kernel vs. 2.4 kernel, please help!

2001-12-31 Thread dman
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 07:17:33AM +1100, Penguin wrote: | Debian website says 2.4 is not really mature enough yet, does this mean | mature enough security wise also? 2.4 is newer than 2.2 and (therefore) hasn't been tested as much. | I am trying to figure out what kernel I should use, for the n