Re: 2.1.x series with IP-Masqing

1998-10-18 Thread Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan
On 18 Oct 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Nikolai" == Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Nikolai> This means that you will need to use the ipchains package > Nikolai> (not yet debianisedq) to do firewalling/masq'ing. > > What do you mean, not yet Debianiz

Re: 2.1.x series with IP-Masqing

1998-10-18 Thread Manoj Srivastava
Hi, >>"Nikolai" == Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Nikolai> This means that you will need to use the ipchains package Nikolai> (not yet debianisedq) to do firewalling/masq'ing. What do you mean, not yet Debianized? It's in netbase. manoj __> type -a ipch

Re: 2.1.x series with IP-Masqing

1998-10-18 Thread Nikolai Andreyevich Luzan
On Sat, 17 Oct 1998, Steve Lamb wrote: > Just a warning to anyone who is considering using the 2.1.x series since > 2.2 is rumoured (I stress that word highly) to be out soon. If you use > IP-Masqing it appears that the 2.1.x kernels break ipfwadm. With a broken > ipfwadm it isn't possible t

Re: 2.1.x series with IP-Masqing

1998-10-18 Thread Rene Hojbjerg Larsen
Steve Lamb wrote: > Just a warning to anyone who is considering using the 2.1.x series since > 2.2 is rumoured (I stress that word highly) to be out soon. If you use > IP-Masqing it appears that the 2.1.x kernels break ipfwadm. With a broken > ipfwadm it isn't possible to add/remove IP-Masqing

Re: 2.1.x series with IP-Masqing

1998-10-18 Thread Adam Moore
> Just a warning to anyone who is considering using the 2.1.x series since > 2.2 is rumoured (I stress that word highly) to be out soon. If you use > IP-Masqing it appears that the 2.1.x kernels break ipfwadm. With a broken I've never used ipchains, but according to xos.nl, kernels 2.1.102