Re: 2.0.34 error: Freelist block not free

1998-08-21 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Mon, 3 Aug 1998 12:21:14 -0400 (EDT), Camm Maguire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Over the weekend, The following errors started showing up: > - > Aug 1 17:03:01 debian kernel: Problem: block on freelist at 0174d610

Re: 2.0.34 error: Freelist block not free

1998-08-11 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I posted this problem some time ago and received no replies as of yet. I thought it might be worth another try. Can anyone provide insight as to what may be causing this kernel error? (e.g. hardware, kernel-ware, ppp-ware?) > Greetings! I just upgraded this machine to Debian 2.0 a

Re: 2.0.34

1998-06-10 Thread David Wright
On Tue, 9 Jun 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > bash-2.00# ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 netmask 255.255.255.128 broadcast > 203.14.18.127 > SIOCSIFNETMASK: Invalid argument > > It doesn't work on 2.0.32 either, I just discovered. > > > Thanks to everyone who has replied. Any other ideas? It's a long

Re: 2.0.34

1998-06-10 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 08:30:36PM +0200, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >bash-2.00# ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 netmask 255.255.255.128 broadcast > >203.14.18.127 > >SIOCSIFNETMASK: Invalid argument > > > >It doesn't

Re: 2.0.34

1998-06-09 Thread Miquel van Smoorenburg
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >bash-2.00# ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 netmask 255.255.255.128 broadcast >203.14.18.127 >SIOCSIFNETMASK: Invalid argument > >It doesn't work on 2.0.32 either, I just discovered. Works for me: # ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 n

Re: 2.0.34

1998-06-09 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jun 09, 1998 at 12:34:21PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > > I just upgraded a Debian 1.3 (bo) machine to 2.0.34, and when I do > > ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 netmask 203.14.18.128 broadcast 203.14.18.127 > > That isnt a valid netmask I think you mean 255.255.255.128 ;) > You're right, of course

Re: 2.0.34

1998-06-09 Thread Rob van Nieuwkerk
> I just upgraded a Debian 1.3 (bo) machine to 2.0.34, and when I do > > ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 netmask 203.14.18.128 broadcast 203.14.18.127 ^ ^ > (in /etc/init.d/network), I get > > SIOCSIFNETMASK

Re: 2.0.34

1998-06-09 Thread Alan Cox
> I just upgraded a Debian 1.3 (bo) machine to 2.0.34, and when I do > ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 netmask 203.14.18.128 broadcast 203.14.18.127 That isnt a valid netmask I think you mean 255.255.255.128 ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: 2.0.34

1998-06-09 Thread julien ORTEGA
Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > I just upgraded a Debian 1.3 (bo) machine to 2.0.34, and when I do > > ifconfig eth0 203.14.18.1 netmask 203.14.18.128 broadcast 203.14.18.127 > > (in /etc/init.d/network), I get > > SIOCSIFNETMASK: Invalid argument > > then ifconfig reports the mask is set to 255.255