-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1-Feb-08, at 11:59 PM, Raquel wrote:
I think that I understand what you're saying. However, what's the
difference? If the machine is capable of handling 15 VirtualHosts
with 1 nic and 1 IP number, why can it not handle 15 VirtualHosts with
2 n
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:44:47PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800 Raquel wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> > > > cards is setup but now I have nee
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:35:18PM -0900, Ken Irving wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800 Raquel wrote:
> >
> > > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> > > cards is setup but now I have need to setup
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 08:59:38PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:45:30 -0500
> "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sure. It would make sense if the hardware could keep up with two
> > NICs going full-out, so it depends on the network speed
> > (10/100/1000), the spe
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 22:45:30 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. It would make sense if the hardware could keep up with two
> NICs going full-out, so it depends on the network speed
> (10/100/1000), the speed and quality of the NICs, and the power of
> the computer. Either
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 07:28:47PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:54:37 -0500
> "Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks, Doug. Yes. The "9"s are place-holders. I've not been
> > > using the seco
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:54:37 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
>
> > Thanks, Doug. Yes. The "9"s are place-holders. I've not been
> > using the second nic because it wasn't needed. However, now I
> > want to host 2 di
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 06:37:04PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> Thanks, Doug. Yes. The "9"s are place-holders. I've not been using
> the second nic because it wasn't needed. However, now I want to host
> 2 different SSL hosts using named virtual hosts. So, I need a second
> IP and I'm dipping into
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:44:11 -0500
"Douglas A. Tutty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800
> > Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of
> > > thos
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800
> Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> > cards is setup but now I have need to setup another. The
> > current /etc/network/interfac
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:37:03PM -0800, Raquel wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800 Raquel wrote:
>
> > I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> > cards is setup but now I have need to setup another. The
> > current /etc/network/interfaces looks like:
> > # T
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:00 -0800
Raquel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 2 network cards in this machine. Currently only one of those
> cards is setup but now I have need to setup another. The
> current /etc/network/interfaces looks like:
> # The primary network interface
> allow-hotplug eth
Petre Daniel wrote:
>
> yeah,like all new releases of mandrake,redhat autoconfigure 2 network
> cards,but with our beautiful debian we gotta work it out,and feel the taste
> of manual settings and confugiration..
> perrsonally,i like this way best..
> call me old fashion,i'll call you click&pointe
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:39:46PM -0500, Bob Underwood wrote:
| On Wednesday 02 January 2002 13:23, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
| > hi,
| >
| > I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had there (some
| > weeks ago, not working anymore) internet sharing enabled. When
| > switching, I also
On Wednesday 02 January 2002 13:23, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had there (some
> weeks ago, not working anymore) internet sharing enabled. When
> switching, I also want it to be correct again. The problem is My debian
> does not recognize
yeah,like all new releases of mandrake,redhat autoconfigure 2 network
cards,but with our beautiful debian we gotta work it out,and feel the taste
of manual settings and confugiration..
perrsonally,i like this way best..
call me old fashion,i'll call you click&pointers :)))
At 12:03 PM 1/2/02, M
On 02/01/02 Petre Daniel did speaketh:
> i think there is an option in lilo.conf ,something with append= ...
> to make your system look for the second eth at boot time.
> check the www.linuxdocs.org for the boot parameters
> good luck.
Strange. That's not required on my router using Linksys cards
dig this, Pauwel http://www.linuxgazette.com/issue36/tag/21.html
search inside the page for append,i think is what you were looking for..
once again,good luck..
At 10:23 AM 1/2/02, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
hi,
I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had there (some
weeks ago, no
i think there is an option in lilo.conf ,something with append= ...
to make your system look for the second eth at boot time.
check the www.linuxdocs.org for the boot parameters
good luck.
At 10:23 AM 1/2/02, Pauwel Demeyer wrote:
hi,
I'm going from a Mandrake 8.1 system to debian. I've had th
use :
dmesg
and look for info about eth0, eth1 or the name of your card
How are you determining if which cards are being detected?
--
Ray
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've come in late on this message, so I'm not sure I'm catching it all,
but you should be able to assign your two network cards eth0 and eth1 in
your /etc/conf.modules. In there, you should see something like:
alias eth0 (eexpress in this case)
options eth0 io=0xXX iqr=X
You should just be able
Sorry, I should have read your email more closely. You did say "How do I get the
eexpress module to recognize both cards and set the first to eth0 and the second
to eth1?" Using append= in lilo would only apply if the devices you're trying to
configure are compiled into the kernel, not as a module.
MR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
> >> append="ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1"
[...]
>
>
> I moved my append line to the top and tried yours also and it still does
> not pick up the second card. I know the card works as it was pulled from
> another system so it shouldn't be the hardw
On %M 0, MR wrote
> /etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
>
> boot=/dev/hda1
> root=/dev/hda1
> install=/boot/boot.b
> map=/boot/map
> vga=normal
> delay=20
> image=/vmlinuz
> label=Linux
> read-only
> append="ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1"
>
> ran liloconfig and let it install a b
>> /etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
>>
>> boot=/dev/hda1
>> root=/dev/hda1
>> install=/boot/boot.b
>> map=/boot/map
>> vga=normal
>> delay=20
>> image=/vmlinuz
>> label=Linux
>> read-only
>> append="ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1"
>>
>> ran liloconfig and let it install a b
MR wrote:
>
> /etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
>
> boot=/dev/hda1
> root=/dev/hda1
> install=/boot/boot.b
> map=/boot/map
> vga=normal
> delay=20
> image=/vmlinuz
> label=Linux
> read-only
> append="ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1"
>
> ran liloconfig and let it install a bo
/etc/lilo.conf now looks like:
boot=/dev/hda1
root=/dev/hda1
install=/boot/boot.b
map=/boot/map
vga=normal
delay=20
image=/vmlinuz
label=Linux
read-only
append="ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1"
ran liloconfig and let it install a boot block using the current lilo config.
You'll need to pass params to your kernel. If you're booting with lilo you'll
need to
edit add:
append = "ether=11,0x300,eth0 ether=10,0x240,eth1"
If I got the eth0, eth1 right...
MR wrote:
> OK, I appreciate all the help I received about my original problem. I have
> determined that one of th
I fixed the problem by purging the ipmasq package
and instead writing my own ipchain commands in a local file at
/etc/init.d
-Oz
> On %M 0, Oz Dror wrote
> > I have a similar problem, But instead of having 2 network cards I have
> > one card using IP aliasing ( two subnets on the same card/network
On %M 0, Oz Dror wrote
> I have a similar problem, But instead of having 2 network cards I have
> one card using IP aliasing ( two subnets on the same card/network, one for
> DSL and the
> second local 192.168.0.x).
>
> as soon as I start ipmasq I cannot ping beyond the local subnet of each
> ca
I have a similar problem, But instead of having 2 network cards I have
one card using IP aliasing ( two subnets on the same card/network, one for DSL
and the
second local 192.168.0.x).
as soon as I start ipmasq I cannot ping beyond the local subnet of each
card, thus I cannot access the DNS serv
>On Sat, 8 May 1999, MR wrote:
>
>I have two network cards (1 Intel etherexpress 16, 1 NE2000) in a debian
>system. Both are detected on boot up and both are ifconfig'd. This system
>will be used to connect my little LAN through IP masq to the Internet. For
>various reasons, I am only able to have
At 01:58 PM 5/9/99 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sat, 8 May 1999, MR wrote:
>
>> I have two network cards (1 Intel etherexpress 16, 1 NE2000) in a debian
>> system. Both are detected on boot up and both are ifconfig'd. This system
>> will be used to connect my little LAN through IP masq to the Internet. Fo
On Sat, 8 May 1999, MR wrote:
> I have two network cards (1 Intel etherexpress 16, 1 NE2000) in a debian
> system. Both are detected on boot up and both are ifconfig'd. This system
> will be used to connect my little LAN through IP masq to the Internet. For
> various reasons, I am only able to hav
35 matches
Mail list logo
