On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 08:26:59PM -0700, Stephan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> A quick (and hopefully simply answered because I must have missed
> something) question.
>
> Now and then, messages are output to the tty display, such as USB
> devices being plugged in, etc. Is there a way to have those
>
> Now and then, messages are output to the tty display, such as
> USB
> devices being plugged in, etc. Is there a way to have
> those messages
> sent to an SSH terminal? I'm using OpenSSH.
>
I believe you can change where those messages go by editing your
/etc/syslog.conf file, specifi
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:26:59 -0700
Stephan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> A quick (and hopefully simply answered because I must have missed
> something) question.
>
> Now and then, messages are output to the tty display, such as USB
> devices being plugged in, etc. Is there a way to have those messa
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:33:19PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:37:28PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:13:45PM +, steef wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > Please avoid using forward (unless you are forwarding a totally new
> > message) be
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 11:37:28PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:13:45PM +, steef wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Please avoid using forward (unless you are forwarding a totally new
> message) because it breaks the threading (no In-Reply-to: header). I use
> reply and just
you are right, of course. was even too tired for that last night.
thanks,
steef
Andrei Popescu wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:13:45PM +, steef wrote:
[snip]
Please avoid using forward (unless you are forwarding a totally new
message) because it breaks the threading (no In-Reply-t
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:52:43AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> I tried to use one machine with two card, as gateway, I activate the
> ip_forward, ( echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward ), but it
> didn't work.
> no replying packet when I ping from a machine to another via my GW,
>
>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 10:52:43AM +0100, abdelkader belahcene wrote:
> Hi,
> I tried to use one machine with two card, as gateway, I activate the
> ip_forward, ( echo "1" > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward ), but it
> didn't work.
> no replying packet when I ping from a machine to another via my GW
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 04:47:07PM -0800, ThanhVu Nguyen wrote:
> I have a large number of emails stored in a mbox file
> and I read these mails from mutt. I'd like to forward
> *each* one of them to a new email address (not as a
> big attachment). I can forward one by one manually
> but I am loo
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 19:12 -0800, ThanhVu Nguyen wrote:
> In respond to suggestions about moving the mbox file
> to another machine: I plan to store these mails from
> my local machine to a web-based location such as
> Yahoo. Therefore I cannot do as suggested, I have to
> email those to myself.
In respond to suggestions about moving the mbox file
to another machine: I plan to store these mails from
my local machine to a web-based location such as
Yahoo. Therefore I cannot do as suggested, I have to
email those to myself.
Thanks for the tip on the the bounce feature in mutt.
It is wha
On Fri, 2004-12-10 at 16:45 -0800, ThanhVu Nguyen (Yahoo) wrote:
> I have a large number of emails stored in a mbox file
> and I read these mails from mutt. I'd like to forward
> *each* one of them to a new email address (not as a
> big attachment). I can forward one by one manually
> but I am lo
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 10:36:58AM -0500, BruceG wrote:
> Think I have my .forward working MUCH better. No duplicates, going in
> proper directories based on $header_to: Next question is, can you filter
> on cc:'s? I need to move the cc:'s into the proper directory as well.
I suggest fil
On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 10:15:09PM +1100, Peter Johnson wrote:
> If using Maildirs then consider maildrop. I personally find it rather
> easy to configure but still packs plenty of options but if ~/mm is an
> mbox then this isn't an option.
is it not possible to use a combination of maildirs and mb
If using Maildirs then consider maildrop. I personally find it rather
easy to configure but still packs plenty of options but if ~/mm is an
mbox then this isn't an option.
my 2c
Peter Johnson
On Sat, 2003-01-11 at 21:52, Hugh Saunders wrote:
> Hello, i am on debian-user so get *lots* of mail co
This one time, at band camp, Mark Ferlatte said:
> Debian probably should have a manpage describing the .forward file.
/usr/share/doc/exim/filter.txt.gz
HTH,
Steve
--
Laugh and the world laughs with you, snore and you sleep alone.
msg08805/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> One more question regarding this file. Is there a way to have it just
> send a carbon copy to another user? I am pretty sure if you had it just
> forward the mail back to you again that it would go in an endless loop.
> Thanks for everybody's help.
Although this was pooh-pooh'ed in your earlie
Steve Juranich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Although this was pooh-pooh'ed in your earlier thread, I really think
> that procmail is what you want/need.
It was pooh-poohed because it wasn't needed.
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
No, the illuminati aren't out t
"steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> One more question regarding this file. Is there a way to have it just
> send a carbon copy to another user?
In .forward:
\user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], anotherlocaluser
--
Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors!
Never lie unless you have an
> One more question regarding this file. Is there a way to have it just
> send a carbon copy to another user? I am pretty sure if you had it
> just
> forward the mail back to you again that it would go in an endless
> loop.
> Thanks for everybody's help.
I think you can just put a backslash on a
i don't think that that's really "too hard" :). your solution is
simpler, yes, but it forces all mail to go that way, whereas with
procmail you can set it to only forward specific emails to that
address.
also, what if one of the addresses is the recieving address? i.e. if
this account is steve@s
begin sean finney quote on Thu, Oct 24, 2002 at 12:40:54PM -0400:
> also, what if one of the addresses is the recieving address? i.e. if
> this account is steve@somehost, and in his .forward he puts
> steve@somehost, steve@someotherhost, things will go Very, Very, Wrong.
If you want the local ac
> In .forward:
>
> \user, [EMAIL PROTECTED], anotherlocaluser
Ah, then I bow to your supreme mastery of the .forward file. :)
I just like killing flies with shotguns. It tends to make the house
messy, though.
--
Stephen W. Ju
steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-24 00:40:48 -0500]:
> Is there a way to set up the .forward file to forward mail to more than
> one user?
You are making it too hard. Just add them to the .forward file.
Example:
huey, duey, luey, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob
msg08627/pgp0.pgp
Description:
> Is there a way to set up the .forward file to forward mail to more than
> one user?
You can set up procmail to do such things. Set your .forward to be
"|/path/to/procmail" and read the procmail docs.
Have fun.
--
Stephen W.
hey steve
if you have procmail installed you can do something like
:0
* ^[EMAIL PROTECTED]
{
:0 c
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:0
! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
}
in your .procmailrc file. if you don't have procmail as
your default delivery agent, you need to put this in your
.forw
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 11:55:25AM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> Wayne Topa muttered:
> > Thanks Paul, but to put the record stright, I found that
> > posted by someone else (wish I could recall who). I found it
> > useful so used it.
>
> This is what I love about Debian: not only are people
> i
Wayne Topa muttered:
>
> Thanks Paul, but to put the record stright, I found that posted by someone
> else (wish I could recall who). I found it useful so used it.
This is what I love about Debian: not only are people incredibly
helpful, the ethical standard is so high that the average person wo
Subject: Re: .forward file format for exim
Date: Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 01:22:48PM -0700
In reply to:Paul Mackinney
Quoting Paul Mackinney([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I think the problem is that the headers you're testing might not be the
> best choices due to how this li
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 04:46:42PM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
> i have the following .forward file in my home directory:
>
> #debian lists
> if $h_From: contains "debian-user" or
>$h_To: contains "Debian-user"
>then
>save mail/debian
> endif
>
> theoretically, this sh
On Tue, Aug 14, 2001 at 01:22:48PM -0700, Paul Mackinney wrote:
> if $h_Resent-Sender: contains "debian" then
>
> but replaced with
>
> if $h_x-mailing-list matches "^"
> then
neither of them work for me.
maybe i should make some changes in my exim.conf first.
> My advice: locate and
Dave Sherohman muttered:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 04:46:42PM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
> > #debian lists
> > if $h_From: contains "debian-user" or
> >$h_To: contains "Debian-user"
> >then
> >save mail/debian
> > endif
> >
> > theoretically, this should tell exim to sor
On Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 04:46:42PM +1000, Sam Varghese wrote:
> #debian lists
> if $h_From: contains "debian-user" or
>$h_To: contains "Debian-user"
>then
>save mail/debian
> endif
>
> theoretically, this should tell exim to sort incoming
> mail into the files specifie
On 11 Aug, Sam Varghese wrote:
> i have the following .forward file in my home directory:
>
>
> #debian lists
> if $h_From: contains "debian-user" or
>$h_To: contains "Debian-user"
>then
>save mail/debian
> endif
>
> theoretically, this should tell exim to sort incom
nevermind i found another way to do autoresponders.
from /etc/mail/aliases !! woohoo.
nate
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:59:11PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> hi
>
>
> im tryin to get vacation working. however my system seems
> to be ignoring the .forward . mail is delivered straight
> to
check the man page for sendmail. It should have what you are looking for
(sorry, using putty now so no cut/paste).
rick
Holp, John Mr. writes:
> Debian Users,
>
> I have recently ordered a book titled "Sendmail for Linux" by
> Richard Blum but right now I am inpatient as it hasn't arrive
On Thu, 08 Mar 2001 13:35:09 EST, "Holp, John Mr." writes:
> I know about the existence of the .forward file and as mail comes in
>the .forward file is checked if it exists and then mail is forwarded to the
>address/es listed in the .forward file --- I think?
And so it is.
> There is
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 05:14:18PM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> I'm trying to forward port 23 (telnet) on my firewall to 22 (ssh) on my
> workstation. Getting around some outbound traffic filtering issues.
>
> However, when I attempt to connect to this interface, I'm getting
> "connection
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 07:47:45PM -0600, Richard Cobbe wrote:
> Since most of the MTAs shipped with Linux distributions are configured to
> use procmail as their default MDA, the above is unnecessary. For instance,
> exim under potato and sendmail under RedHat 6.2 both hand all messages off
> to
Quoting Adam Read ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I'm looking for a doc on how to write .forward files. I've searched
> sendmail.org, all the documentation that comes with sendmail, and the LDP.
> If anyone could help I'd be most greatful.
Without saying whether you need one or not, this is my .forward
Lo, on Monday, January 15, Ayman Haidar did write:
> I haven't used .forward file for a long time. if you use fetchmail and
> procmail (of course I do) you can add this line to .fetchmailrc
> mda "/usr/bin/procmail -d %s"
>
> I hope this helps
>
Since most of the MTAs shipped with Linux d
If you are trying to forward all of your mail to
a differnet address then your .forward file should
just have a line(s) with the address as to where
they are to be forwarded to. Ex:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This will forward your email to both of the above
addresses. If you are forw
I haven't used .forward file for a long time. if you use fetchmail and
procmail (of course I do) you can add this line to .fetchmailrc
mda "/usr/bin/procmail -d %s"
I hope this helps
Once upon a time Adam Read ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I'm looking for a doc on how to write .forwa
when i was using a .forward file, it had a single line with my email
address to forward to on it, thats it.
-Casey
On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Adam Read wrote:
> I'm looking for a doc on how to write .forward files. I've searched
> sendmail.org, all the documentation that comes with sendmail, and the
Sends two copies to each of them.
Hi!
Dan Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>
> > Basically I want to send a copy mail received by my work account to
> > my home account and not erase it on my work account.
>
> The simple solution is to use procmail. Though I don't know the exact
> thin
Just include yourself in the .forward file --
/yourself, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
/*** Running Debian Linux ***
* For God so loved the world that He gave his only begotten Son, *
* that whoever believes in Him should not perish...John 3:16 *
* W. Pa
I believe that this is the first example in the procmailex manpage...
Carl
I would thought fetchmail is what you are after.
Have a look at the fetchmail package and the keep option to see if it is what
you
want.
Dan Nguyen wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
> : Basically I want to send a copy mail received by my work account
> : to my home account an
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
: Basically I want to send a copy mail received by my work account
: to my home account and not erase it on my work account.
The simple solution is to use procmail. Though I don't know the exact
things to put in your ~/.procmailrc file. I have used it t
Catalin Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ---
> 02/04/1998 22:36:19: [m0y0BYR-000I3ZC] Received FROM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> HO\ST:localhost PROTOCOL:smtp PROGRAM:sendmail ORIG-ID:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> SIZE:462
> 02/04/1
Catalin Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's me again. I looked what's in the logfile of smail in an attempt to
> see what is wrong with my .forward and .procmailrc files. I cannot figure
> out what to do next, but it seems to me that it is something wrong
> _before_ procmail, so procmail do
Uhm, isn't smail finicky about the permissions on a .forward file? If it
does not trust the file, it will not obey it.
I am giving .sigs a break this month
George Bonser
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm using sendmail *duck*. And it seems to work sorta I think
my problem is one with procmail and slocal. Although I havent played much
with getting it to forward to another address, that was a problem from
a user that I couldn't figure out.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>Jason Kill
> > Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe
> > to a program (ie procmail). It seems like it is not even being
> > looked at.
>
> I came across the same problem.
>
> .forward is working fine as long as there are only some email
> addresses inside. It seems that Smail ca
Jason Killen writes:
>
> Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a program
> (ie procmail). It seems like it is not even being looked at.
Ouh, I thougt it was a misconfiguration by me on my machine in the
offices. Reading this it doesn't seem to be. :-(
I came acros
I think it needs to be world-readable. I was playing with it last week and
found that the smail log will show when a program is invoked. That helped
me get from step n to n+1.
On Mon, 7 Apr 1997, Jason Killen wrote:
>
> Does anyone have any idea why .forward would not forward or pipe to a progra
57 matches
Mail list logo
