Re: .32 kernel

1997-11-30 Thread Shaleh
Because I am running 2.0.29 and thought it was time for a new kernel. ;-) Though I'd ask after the last two kernels had their share of problems. Alex Yukhimets wrote: > > Yes. Why? -- TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to [EMAIL PROTECTED] . Trouble? e-mail

Re: .32 kernel

1997-11-30 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : I used it, until I heard that file system corruption was being experienced : by some. I had no problems that I can see, and will probably do some more : "experimental" use of it in the future. Particular problems? Uhmmm, don't scare me!!! Three of our pro

Re: .32 kernel

1997-11-30 Thread Eloy A. Paris
Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: : I used it, until I heard that file system corruption was being experienced : by some. I had no problems that I can see, and will probably do some more : "experimental" use of it in the future. Particular problems? Uhmmm, don't scare me!!! Three of our pro

Re: .32 kernel

1997-11-30 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Sat, 29 Nov 1997, Shaleh wrote: > Anyone tried out this kernel? > I used it, until I heard that file system corruption was being experienced by some. I had no problems that I can see, and will probably do some more "experimental" use of it in the future. Particular problems? Luck, Dwarf --

Re: .32 kernel

1997-11-30 Thread Alex Yukhimets
> Anyone tried out this kernel? Yes. Why? Alex Y. -- _ _( )_ ( (o___ +---+ | _ 7 |Alexander Yukhimets| \(")| http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ | / \ \ +--