On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 05:52:49PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..another question is, what kinda performance enhanchement can
> zfs-fuse or zfsonlinux deliver, 5%, 50% or even 500%, compared
> to the best GPL file systems? And, no risk of vendor lock-in?
Performance is a multi-faceted thing: Yo
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 08:25:04AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> If it's a problem with the module, contact the module maintainers. If it's a
> problem with the kernel, unload the module, and contact the kernel
> maintainers. I don't see the problem.
Please read up on tainted mode. You can't just
On Sat, 12 May 2012 09:09:14 +0100, Jon wrote in message
<20120512080914.GD27051@debian>:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:27:36AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> > And it's not a problem as a kernel module either, seeing as though
> > it's the user who has to manually load it. For that, the license
>
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 09:09:14AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> It's a problem if you ever want help if/when there's a bug or problem with the
> module, since the kernel will be marked 'tainted'.
If it's a problem with the module, contact the module maintainers. If it's a
problem with the kernel, u
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 09:27:36AM -0600, Aaron Toponce wrote:
> And it's not a problem as a kernel module either, seeing as though it's the
> user who has to manually load it. For that, the license could be
> proprietarded.
It's a problem if you ever want help if/when there's a bug or problem wit
On Fri, 11 May 2012 09:27:36 -0600, Aaron wrote in message
<20120511152735.gn21...@eightyeight.xmission.com>:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:32:54PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> > Yes that's what I was referring to. The CDDL is incompatible with
> > the GPL, but it is fine with the BSD license, so D
On Fri, 11 May 2012 14:32:54 +0100, Jon wrote in message
<20120511133254.GD1319@debian>:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:40:53PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > ..it is (at least in theory) possible to crack both GNU/Linux and
> > */kfreeBSD at the same time, and it is also possible to attack
> > GN
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 02:32:54PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> Yes that's what I was referring to. The CDDL is incompatible with the GPL, but
> it is fine with the BSD license, so Debian GNU/KFreeBSD doesn't have those
> problems.
And it's not a problem as a kernel module either, seeing as though
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 06:40:53PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..it is (at least in theory) possible to crack both GNU/Linux and
> */kfreeBSD at the same time, and it is also possible to attack
> GNU Hurd at the same time as the former 2, even if I agree with
> Microsoft FUD that by extension hol
9 matches
Mail list logo
