> Hmmm, not to my knowledge. Using modutils_2.1.34-5a and tried 2.1.34-5
> before that. /etc/conf.modules is substantially the same as the one on my
> hamm box. Think I'll make a kernel-source-29-deb and let it install
> itself.
You're probably using an older version of kernel-package that ins
> gum# depmod -av | less
> modprobe: error reading ELF header: No such file or directory
> TYPE /lib/modules/boot
> TYPE /lib/modules/2.0.29/fs
> etc etc
Try this and attempt depmod again:
rm `find /lib/modules -name "*_MODULES"`
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsu
Hi Manoj,
Take a bow. That fixed it.
I remembered reading about this and had deleted all the text files in
/lib/modules/2.0.29 thinking that they were the problem. Now I will have
to put them back!
Your help appreciated.
Lindsay
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi,
This is a problem with the newer versions of depmod and
friends throwing a hissy fit over non .o files under
/lib/modules/2.0.29/. Older versions did not have a problem, so older
versions of kernel package left text files in /lib/modules/* as
documentation (actually, this reflected
Hi Bruce,
On Tue, 26 Aug 1997, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Didn't the format of /etc/conf.modules change?
>
> Bruce
> --
Hmmm, not to my knowledge. Using modutils_2.1.34-5a and tried 2.1.34-5
before that. /etc/conf.modules is substantially the same as the one on my
hamm box. Think I'll ma
Didn't the format of /etc/conf.modules change?
Bruce
--
Can you get your operating system fixed when you need it?
Linux - the supportable operating system. http://www.debian.org/support.html
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PROTECTED] 510-215-3502
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e
6 matches
Mail list logo
