Re: Unidentified subject!

On 3/23/25 02:19, BALDO wrote: Hi everyone, I have a question for you. We work with BD images, but is it possible to merge these images and put them on an external m.2? If we create the first bootable disk on the external memory with Balena Etcher, then manually add the packages in the pool folde

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 10:19:18AM +0100, BALDO wrote: > Hi everyone, I have a question for you. We work with BD images, but is it > possible to merge these images and put them on an external m.2? I think you've been given an answer. I would always suggest using a USB because this is more straight

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > As somebody testing images when point releases are made, I > would suggest against using larger images than the DLBD - there is the > likelihood of bit errors to ruin your image when writing many GB There is a file md5sum.txt in the ISOs to check the transport integ

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, BALDO wrote: > We work with BD images, but is it > possible to merge these images and put them on an external m.2? Aha. Once in a year this question pops up. Three years ago i invested some shell programming effort and tested it with amd64 ISOs. See: https://wiki.debian.org/MergeDebianIsos

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

David Christensen writes: On 2/12/24 08:30, Linux-Fan wrote: David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml What algorithm did you implement? I copied the algorit

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/12/24 08:30, Linux-Fan wrote: David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml What algorithm did you implement? I copied the algorithm from here: https://www.j

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 3:02 PM Linux-Fan wrote: > > David Christensen writes: > > > On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: > >> I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple > >> threads: > >> https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml > >> > >> Before knowing about `fio` this way my w

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml Before knowing about `fio` this way my way to benchmark SSDs :) Example: | $ big4 -b /dev/null 100 GiB | Ma_Sys.ma Big

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/11/24 02:26, Linux-Fan wrote: I wrote a program to automatically generate random bytes in multiple threads: https://masysma.net/32/big4.xhtml Before knowing about `fio` this way my way to benchmark SSDs :) Example: | $ big4 -b /dev/null 100 GiB | Ma_Sys.ma Big 4.0.2, Copyright (c) 2014,

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/11/24 03:13, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Christensen wrote: Concurrency: threads throughput 8 205+198+180+195+205+184+184+189=1,540 MB/s There remains the question how to join these streams without losing speed in order to produce a single checksum. (Or one would have to divide

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/11/24 00:07, Thomas Schmitt wrote: In the other thread about the /dev/sdm test: Gene Heskett wrote: Creating file 39.h2w ... 1.98% -- 1.90 MB/s -- 257:11:32 [...] $ sudo f3probe --destructive --time-ops /dev/sdm Bad news: The device `/dev/sdm' is a counterfeit of type limbo Device geometry

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 9:52 AM Thomas Schmitt wrote: > > David Christensen wrote: > > Concurrency: > > threads throughput > > 8 205+198+180+195+205+184+184+189=1,540 MB/s > > There remains the question how to join these streams without losing speed > in order to produce a single checksum. (

Re: Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/11/24 05:26, Linux-Fan wrote: David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 00:11, Thomas Schmitt wrote: [...] Increase block size: 2024-02-11 01:18:51 dpchrist@laalaa ~ $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1K 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) cop

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, David Christensen wrote: > Concurrency: > threads throughput > 8 205+198+180+195+205+184+184+189=1,540 MB/s There remains the question how to join these streams without losing speed in order to produce a single checksum. (Or one would have to divide the target into 8 areas which get che

Fast Random Data Generation (Was: Re: Unidentified subject!)

David Christensen writes: On 2/11/24 00:11, Thomas Schmitt wrote: [...] Increase block size: 2024-02-11 01:18:51 dpchrist@laalaa ~ $ dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1K 1024+0 records in 1024+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 3.62874 s, 296 MB/s Here (Int

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/11/24 00:11, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, David Christensen wrote: $ time dd if=/dev/urandom bs=8K count=128K | wc -c [...] 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 4.30652 s, 249 MB/s This looks good enough for practical use on spinning rust and slow SSD. Yes. Maybe the "wc" pipe s

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, David Christensen wrote: > $ time dd if=/dev/urandom bs=8K count=128K | wc -c > [...] > 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB, 1.0 GiB) copied, 4.30652 s, 249 MB/s This looks good enough for practical use on spinning rust and slow SSD. Maybe the "wc" pipe slows it down ? ... not much on 4 GHz Xeon with D

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, i wrote: > > In the other thread about the /dev/sdm test: Gene Heskett wrote: > > > Creating file 39.h2w ... 1.98% -- 1.90 MB/s -- 257:11:32 > > > [...] > > > $ sudo f3probe --destructive --time-ops /dev/sdm > > > Bad news: The device `/dev/sdm' is a counterfeit of type limbo > > > Device geom

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 10:28, Thomas Schmitt wrote: In the other thread about the /dev/sdm test: Creating file 39.h2w ... 1.98% -- 1.90 MB/s -- 257:11:32 but is taking a few bytes now and then. [...] $ ls -l total 40627044 [...] $ sudo f3probe --destructive --time-ops /dev/sdm Bad news: The device `/dev/sdm

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 02:38, Thomas Schmitt wrote: I have an own weak-random generator, but shred beats it by a factor of 10 when writing to /dev/null. As a baseline, here is a 2011 Dell Latitude E6520 with Debian generating a non-repeatable 1 GiB stream of cryptographically secure pseudo-random number

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 13:30, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, gene heskett wrote: my fading eyesight couldn't see the diffs between () and {} in a 6 point font. I need a bigger, more legible font in t-bird. That's why i propose to copy+paste problematic command lines. Your mouse can read it, your mail client

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, gene heskett wrote: > my fading eyesight couldn't see > the diffs between () and {} in a 6 point font. I need a bigger, more > legible font in t-bird. That's why i propose to copy+paste problematic command lines. Your mouse can read it, your mail client can send it, and we have youngsters h

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/10/24 05:39, Thomas Schmitt wrote: Hi, Gene Heskett wrote: Is bash not actually bash these days? It is not doing for loops for me. Come on Gene, be no sophie. Copy+paste your failing line here. :)) Alexander M. posted it a few days ago but my fading eyesight couldn't see the diffs betw

Re: Unidentified subject!

>> AFAIK the bogus 128TB drives do properly report such ridiculous sizes: >> the reality only hits when you try to actually store that amount of >> information on them. >> [ I'm not sure how it works under the hood, but since SSDs store their >>data "anywhere" in the flash, they can easily pret

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi, Gene Heskett wrote: > Is bash not actually bash these days? It is not doing for loops for me. Come on Gene, be no sophie. Copy+paste your failing line here. :)) IIRC the for-loop in question writes several copies of the same file. ( https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/02/msg00318.html

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2/7/24 23:28, Stefan Monnier wrote: Well the 2T memory everybody was curious about 3 weeks ago got here early. From dmesg after plugging one in: [629240.916163] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 39 using xhci_hcd [629241.066221] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=048d, idProduct

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hi all, Am 08.02.2024 um 21:38 schrieb Andy Smith: Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:40:54PM +0100, Ralph Aichinger wrote: On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: I learned not to go there a long time ago and have seen plenty of reminders along the way from others' misfortunes to

Re: Unidentified subject!

Charles Curley writes: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:02:36 -0500 > Stefan Monnier wrote: > >> > Test it with Validrive. >> > https://www.grc.com/validrive.htm >> >> Looks like proprietary software for Windows. > > badblocks, available in a Debian repo near you, might be a suitable > replacement.

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thu, 08 Feb 2024 18:02:36 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: > > Test it with Validrive. > > https://www.grc.com/validrive.htm > > Looks like proprietary software for Windows. badblocks, available in a Debian repo near you, might be a suitable replacement. -- Does anybody read signatures any mo

Re: Unidentified subject!

> Test it with Validrive. > https://www.grc.com/validrive.htm Looks like proprietary software for Windows. Stefan

Re: Unidentified subject!

gene heskett writes: > Well the 2T memory everybody was curious about 3 weeks ago got here early. > > From dmesg after plugging one in: > [629240.916163] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 39 using xhci_hcd > [629241.066221] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=048d, > idProduct=1234, b

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 16:28, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:22:49PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:17PM +, Andy Smith wrote: I really do mean all forms of USB that come over a USB port. That line was meant to read I really do mean all forms of storage

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:22:49PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:17PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > > I really do mean all forms of USB that come over a USB port. > > That line was meant to read > > I really do mean all forms of storage that come over a USB port.

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 16:16, Andy Smith wrote: On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:56:19PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: On 2/8/24 15:43, Andy Smith wrote: I wouldn't have much issue with taking a USB drive out of its caddy to get the SATA drive from inside, except that it would have to be an amazingly good deal to make it

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 04:00:01PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > I have been using USB attached HDDs and SSDs for 10 years now and > have never had one unexpectedly go off line. Your postings > suggest you don't know what your talking about. Okay then. Despite this uncharitable comment, I do st

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 03:56:19PM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > On 2/8/24 15:43, Andy Smith wrote: > > I wouldn't have much issue with taking a USB drive out of its caddy > > to get the SATA drive from inside, except that it would have to be > > an amazingly good deal to make it worth voiding the warran

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 15:35, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 12:23:45AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: On 08/02/2024 22:36, Andy Smith wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 15:43, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 AM Ralph Aichinger wrote: How does a breaking USB disk differ from a breaking SATA disk? I may be mistaken, but I believe AS is talking about USB thumb driv

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 08:43:17PM +, Andy Smith wrote: > I really do mean all forms of USB that come over a USB port. That line was meant to read I really do mean all forms of storage that come over a USB port. Thanks, Andy -- https://bitfolk.com/ -- No-nonsense VPS hosting

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 02:20:59PM -0500, Jeffrey Walton wrote: > On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 AM Ralph Aichinger wrote: > > How does a breaking USB disk differ from a breaking SATA disk? > > I may be mistaken, but I believe AS is talking about USB thumb drives, > SDcards and the like. I

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 05:40:54PM +0100, Ralph Aichinger wrote: > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: > > I learned not to go there a long time ago and have seen plenty of > > reminders along the way from others' misfortunes to not ever go > > there again myself. > > How

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 12:23:45AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 08/02/2024 22:36, Andy Smith wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > > > [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 > > > > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 11:57 AM Ralph Aichinger wrote: > > On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: > > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious > > computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say > > they use it all the time and it is fine. > > I am

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 08/02/2024 22:36, Andy Smith wrote: On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious computing. Do you mean that a proper backup drive should use uas (USB Attached Sto

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Thu, 2024-02-08 at 15:36 +, Andy Smith wrote: > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious > computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say > they use it all the time and it is fine.  I am clearly in the latter camp. This mail is delivered via a Raspberry P

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hi, On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 11:14:24AM -0500, Gremlin wrote: > On 2/8/24 10:36, Andy Smith wrote: > > USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious > > computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say > > they use it all the time and it is fine. They will keep saying t

Re: Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On 2/8/24 10:36, Andy Smith wrote: Hello, On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say they use it all

Things I don't touch with a 3.048m barge pole: USB storage (Was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Hello, On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 03:30:29PM -0500, gene heskett wrote: > [629241.074187] scsi host37: usb-storage 1-2:1.0 USB storage is for phones and cameras etc, not for serious computing. Many people will disagree with that statement and say they use it all the time and it is fine. They will ke

Re: Unidentified subject!

> Well the 2T memory everybody was curious about 3 weeks ago got here early. > > From dmesg after plugging one in: > [629240.916163] usb 1-2: new high-speed USB device number 39 using xhci_hcd > [629241.066221] usb 1-2: New USB device found, idVendor=048d, > idProduct=1234, bcdDevice= 2.00 > [62924

Re: Unidentified subject!

Dan Ritter wrote: ... > You want to ignore the USB ports and focus on the attached > devices. udev is the mechanism here. > > For example, in /etc/udev/rules.d/70-ups I have: > > SUBSYSTEM=="usb", ATTR{idVendor}=="0764", ATTR{idProduct}=="0501", > SYMLINK+="ups0", GROUP="nut" > > Which means that

Re: Unidentified subject!

Hi. Mail headers are mangled, but: On Sun, Oct 20, 2019 at 07:45:26AM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > > And the problem that you're trying to solve by such "predictable" audio > > devices is? > > AUDIODEV=hw:0,0 play MY/m85.WAV AUDIODEV=dmix:CARD=PCH,DEV=0 play MY/m85.WAV Use "aplay

Re: DHCP failure (was Re: Unidentified subject!)

Op Thu, 29 Sep 2016 01:18:02 +0200 schreef Dan Ritter : On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:30:04PM -0700, hol...@cox.net wrote: Clean install of deb8 (jessie)on my Thinkpad T4220i laptop. went well except for the fact that the network configuration with DCP failed. I was given 3 options. 1) try it a

DHCP failure (was Re: Unidentified subject!)

On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 03:30:04PM -0700, hol...@cox.net wrote: > Clean install of deb8 (jessie)on my Thinkpad T4220i laptop. went well > except for the fact that the network configuration > with DCP failed. > > I was given 3 options. > 1) try it again. This was hope over experience. > 2) configur

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 08:55 +0300, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > On 2013-06-23 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 23:36 -0400, Gary Dale wrote: > > > If you have important data on the laptop, you should plug in an > > > external drive and dd the entire laptop drive to an ima

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 2013-06-23 08:48, Ralf Mardorf wrote: On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 23:36 -0400, Gary Dale wrote: If you have important data on the laptop, you should plug in an external drive and dd the entire laptop drive to an image file on the external drive (which must have at least as much free space as the la

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 23:36 -0400, Gary Dale wrote: > If you have important data on the laptop, you should plug in an > external drive and dd the entire laptop drive to an image file on the > external drive (which must have at least as much free space as the > laptop drive's size). A very good adv

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sun, 2013-06-23 at 01:32 +0100, Lagun Adeshina wrote: > All I did was try to install Debian 7 and the RAID5 was just some > option that came up during partitioning. > I read about it and understood it was supposed to keep whole old stuff > sale. That was my understanding and I'm left with no OS

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 22/06/13 08:32 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: > *From:* Gary Dale > *To:* debian-user@lists.debian.org > *Cc:* debian-user@lists.debian.org > *Sent:* Saturday, 22 June 2013, 21:47 > *Subject:* Re: Unidentified subject! > > On 22/06/13 04:38 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: > &g

Re: Unidentified subject!

win7 From: Gary Dale To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Saturday, 22 June 2013, 21:47 Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! On 22/06/13 04:38 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: > Hi Guys, > I need your help. > > 1. I set out to install Debian from W

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 22/06/13 04:38 PM, Lagun Adeshina wrote: Hi Guys, I need your help. 1. I set out to install Debian from Windows 7 2. I downloaded the win 32 Debian Installer and went through the procedures 3. On reaching the partitioning option I got a little confused I had used the RAID5 Partition then 4

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 18:05 +0300, David Baron wrote: > Aren't we all sick of seeing this? > The listings with the messed up headers are next to useless. > The only way to get sane headers is to post on-line, I suppose. > > Someone in the Debian universe has to be able to fix this list! I guess t

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

On Monday 03 September 2012 16:05:12 David Baron wrote: > Aren't we all sick of seeing this? > The listings with the messed up headers are next to useless. > The only way to get sane headers is to post on-line, I suppose. > > Someone in the Debian universe has to be able to fix this list! I have n

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

On Mon, 03 Sep 2012 18:05:12 +0300, David Baron wrote: > Aren't we all sick of seeing this? Well, is a bit annoying, yes. > The listings with the messed up headers are next to useless. The only > way to get sane headers is to post on-line, I suppose. > > Someone in the Debian universe has to be

Re: Unidentified subject!

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 06.05.2012 18:26, David Baron kirjoitti: > Note that this posting has a normal subject, i.e. "Re: > Unidentified subject!" > > > > If it does not appear thus, then the problem is somewhere in > lists.debian.org. Al

Re: Unidentified subject!

Note that this posting has a normal subject, i.e. "Re: Unidentified subject!" If it does not appear thus, then the problem is somewhere in lists.debian.org. Almost all, but not all, messages recently have subject like Unidentified subject! [ ] in the topics list and Unidentif

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

T) Sender: Mika Suomalainen Message-ID: <4fa58e08.1010...@hotmail.com> Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 23:31:04 +0300 From: Mika Suomalainen Reply-To: mika.henrik.mai...@hotmail.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.3) Gecko/20120329 Icedove/10.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 05.05.2012 22:23, Paul Johnson kirjoitti: > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:08 PM, David Baron > wrote: >> These are really getting annoying. >> >> Is this a problem with the list server or what? > > Messages with unidentified subjects? Means someone sen

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

On Sat, 2012-05-05 at 21:51 +0200, an unknown sender wrote: > On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:08 PM, David Baron wrote: > > These are really getting annoying. > > > > Is this a problem with the list server or what? > > Messages with unidentified subjects? Means someone sent the list mail > without a s

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 12:08 PM, David Baron wrote: > These are really getting annoying. > > Is this a problem with the list server or what? Messages with unidentified subjects? Means someone sent the list mail without a subject line. Otherwise, you're going to need to be more specific. -- T

Re: Unidentified subject! [ ]

These are really getting annoying. Is this a problem with the list server or what?

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Fri, 04 May 2012 19:41:33 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 19:34 +0200, an unknown sender wrote: >> As I already said some time ago, a "digest" format is not good for >> replying but reading messages unless you have a capable MUA or add by >> yourself the required header fiel

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 19:34 +0200, an unknown sender wrote: > On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:31:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > No, the Subject issue is still not solved and what's worst, you e-mails > come with bad References/In-Reply-To so they are kept unthreaded: > > *** > References: <1336148525.

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 19:34 +0200, an unknown sender wrote: > On Fri, 04 May 2012 10:21:41 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > I don't have the time to read all mails at the moment. Is this issue > > already known: > > > > On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 08:24 +0200, an unknown sender wrote: > >> debian-user-

Re: Unidentified subject! <-- hope this will be fixed soo

On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:31:09 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: No, the Subject issue is still not solved and what's worst, you e-mails come with bad References/In-Reply-To so they are kept unthreaded: *** References: <1336148525.3899.10.camel@precise> In-Reply-To: <1336148525.3899.10.camel@precise> ***

Re: Unidentified subject! <-- hope this will be fixed soo

*chuckle* Camaleón you're right, I switched from Thunderbird and other Mozilla mailers to Evolution, because it's easier to share mails between several installs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.deb

RAM from the stonagae - Was: Re: Unidentified subject! ;)

On Fri, 2012-05-04 at 08:24 +0200, an unknown sender wrote: > Heh! Coincidentally, I was looking through my old chip box last night to > see if I had a 6502 (I did), and found a HM6116LP-2 and a couple of > HY62256LP-10 chips :-) You know this old reverb? It's full of old RAM, we call it "Weltra

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Wed, 01 Feb 2012 12:28:26 -0800, peasthope wrote: > In-Reply-To=<171057409.40993.30490@cantor.invalid> References: > <171057407.61445.51762@cantor.invalid> > <20120201072109.GE10895@think.nuvreauspam> > <171057409.40993.30490@cantor.invalid> Subject: Re: Re (6): > /usr/lib/mutt/mailto-mutt > >

(OT-Digests) Re: Unidentified subject!

On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 11:27:19 -0800, peasthope wrote: > * In-reply-to: <20111220205521.GJ3296@think.nuvreauspam> * References: > <171057234.68576.57886@heaviside.invalid> > <20111219184739.ge...@hysteria.proulx.com> > <171057235.49702.39796@heaviside.invalid> > <20111219222419.ga22...@h

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Sat, 10 Dec 2011 02:08:29 +0400, Анатолий wrote: > Both: > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-xfce+lxde-CD-1.iso > http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:30:40 -0700, gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com wrote: > I started another install, had the same problem not detecting my WPA > network. It still couldn't detect either of the two unprotected > networks, even when I specified their ESSIDs. WPA won't work. WEP encrypted network

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:29:25 -0700, gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com wrote: > Sorry, you're right that was the wired interface, I must have cut n > pasted the wrong line, my wireless is: > > 0c:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG > [Golan] Network Connection (rev 02) Ah

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

inal Message From: Lisi To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Sat, August 13, 2011 3:21:17 AM Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem) On Friday 12 August 2011 22:30:40 gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com wrote: > From Camaleón's comment, it sounds like using

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

On Friday 12 August 2011 22:30:40 gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com wrote: > From Camaleón's comment, it sounds like using a wireless network to do an > install is generally a problem, has anyone had success with a wireless > install? I'm worried if I ever need to reinstall when I'm not in my home, >

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

ecurity to be at the whim of people who's profit model doesn't really take into consideration whether I can communicate securely. - Original Message From: Charlie To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Fri, August 12, 2011 10:16:12 PM Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! (w

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 14:30:40 -0700 (PDT) "gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com" suggested this: >From Camaleón's comment, it sounds like using a wireless network to do >an install is generally a problem, has anyone had success with a >wireless install? I'm worried if I

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

I started another install, had the same problem not detecting my WPA network. It still couldn't detect either of the two unprotected networks, even when I specified their ESSIDs. Pulled from the syslog, here you see it finding the firmware: Aug 12 20:49:41 check-missing-firmware: missing firmw

Re: Unidentified subject! (wireless installation problem)

ifically watched for it, I see it blinks like mad when the installer says it's trying to detect wireless networks. So it really seems like its trying. Thanks. - Original Message From: Camaleón To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Sent: Fri, August 12, 2011 12:39:47 PM Subject: Re

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 06:13:12 -0700, gnubayonne-debian...@yahoo.com wrote: > I'm trying to do a fresh install of 6.0.2.1, but there is a glitch > bringing up the wireless network on my 1420N Inspiron laptop. It uses > the iwl3945 driver: > > 09:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetLin

Re: Unidentified subject!

In <4dc426d9.7030...@vru.uho.edu.cu>, Alexey Leyva wrote: >help You'll have to be more specific. -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. b...@iguanasuicide.net ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.net/

Re: (OT) Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:33:11 -0500 "Cybe R. Wizard" wrote: > On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:01:44 +0100 > Angus Hedger wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:28:35 + (UTC) > > Camaleón wrote: > > > The Matrix, coming for us :-) > > > > Quick, check for dead pixels! > > Oh, wow. Deja Vu! > > Cyb

Re: (OT) Re: Unidentified subject!

On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 00:01:44 +0100 Angus Hedger wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:28:35 + (UTC) > Camaleón wrote: > > The Matrix, coming for us :-) > > Quick, check for dead pixels! Oh, wow. Deja Vu! Cybe R. Wizard -- It's curtains for Windows around my house. me -- To UNSUBSC

Re: (OT) Re: Unidentified subject!

> On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:28:35 + (UTC) > Camaleón wrote: >> The Matrix, coming for us :-) >> >> Greetings, >> > > Quick, check for dead pixels! > > -- . I checked, and all the red pixies have disappeared -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a su

Re: (OT) Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 22:28:35 + (UTC) Camaleón wrote: > The Matrix, coming for us :-) > > Greetings, > Quick, check for dead pixels! -- Regards, Angus Hedger Debian GNU/Linux User PGP Public Key 0xEE6A4B97 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

(OT) Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 18:23:09 -0400, Anticept . wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM, wrote: >> > What was this? The Matrix, coming for us :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:37 PM, wrote: > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100923164127.ga5...@deeebian > > What was this? -Anticept --

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 20/08/10 00:25, GIE KALIFA COULIBALY wrote: I am new to debian, and I don't have an OS installed on my hard drive yet. I was wondering if a finished debian Cd/DVD would boot off and do the installation at the start up of the computer.I would like to have debian as my main OS. I have a HP pav

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 17:36, Alejandro Rodriguez Luna wrote: > HI all!, > > I just installed Debian Lenny, and after reboot, I update my apt database > (aptitude update), then i wanted to install vim (aptitude install vim), but > the message that appeared was > > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly ins

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 06:24:55PM -0800, joseph lockhart wrote: > >On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 03:47:52PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > thank you doug, appreciate the responce, yes i want it with absolutely > no x, the plan is to put it on an old box to force me to learn the > commandline better

Re: Unidentified subject!

On 10.02.07 10:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 10:25:24 +0900 > Subject: Unidentified subject! > X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/468681 > X-Loop: debian-user@lists.debian.org > List-Id: > List-Post:

Re: Unidentified subject!

On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:33, George Adamides wrote: > hi > how do i delete directories in linux? i used rmdir but when a directory has > other subdirectories its a mess. is there an easy way around? rm -rf will remove a directory even if there are other directories or files within. --

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >