On Fri, 27 Dec 1996, Buddha Buck wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> All of the Linux+Win95 documentation I have talks about adding Linux to
> a working Win95 setup. I'm interested in doing the reverse. I have
> heard that Win95 likes to play around with the MBR and partition tables
> to make sure that
> In my opinion, Win95 is clear proof that MS is interested in
> writing software that sells and couldn't care less if it works.
And M$ sells the beta versions!!!
The beta softwares from Debian works better than the final
versions of the softwares from Macro$oft. When I'll can,
I'll *STOP* using
On Fri, 27 Dec 1996, Bruce Perens wrote:
> Back up your Linux system just in case Windows 95 clobbers its partition.
> Make a boot floppy, and make sure the floppy works. Then you should be
> able to safely install Windows 95. The easiest way to restore LILO is
> probably to re-install the package
Back up your Linux system just in case Windows 95 clobbers its partition.
Make a boot floppy, and make sure the floppy works. Then you should be
able to safely install Windows 95. The easiest way to restore LILO is
probably to re-install the package.
Bruce
--
Bruce Perens K6BP [EMAIL PRO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Sun, 1 Dec 1996, Mohan Khurana wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 30 Nov 1996, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
>
> >
> > Don't worry about that, but be ready to mess up a couple of times as you
> > learn how everything works. Remember the warning to back up any drives
> >
I'm following this up in debian-user now:
On Sat, 30 Nov 1996, Mohan Khurana wrote:
>
> On Sat, 30 Nov 1996, Syrus Nemat-Nasser wrote:
>
> > Windows 95 and Debian coexist on about five machines
> > that I manage. I use loadlin.exe exclusively at this time
> > so I allow DOS/WIN95 to boot first
6 matches
Mail list logo
