On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:00:13AM -0600, Ted Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was
heard to say:
> I hope this message is not OT and forgive my ignorance but I received a
> very informative response to some of my questions and several people
> recommended that I make better use of everyones time by f
>
>
>
> Original Message
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Subject: Re: [debian-user] Re: Wikipedia
>Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 18:26:48 +0200
>
>>On 08/19/2008 06:00 PM, Ted Hilts wrote:
>>> I hope this message is not OT
Jeff Soules writes:
> In short, Wikipedia is sometimes questionable, but so are things you read
> on mailing lists and forums, and even articles published by professional
> journalists.
_Especially_ articles published by professional journalists. No source is
totally reliable, but in my experienc
On 08/19/2008 06:00 PM, Ted Hilts wrote:
> I hope this message is not OT and forgive my ignorance but I received a
1. This message is OT. It is not related to debian and/or running a
debian system.
2. Please configure your mail system not to ask for 'return receipts'.
This is considered impolite
2008/8/19 Ted Hilts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I became very cautious about wikipedia although there seems to be a lot of
> "sound" information. I have seen a lot of references to wikipedia from the
> Debian lists to lists that are science oriented and mathematically oriented.
> Does anyone know what
Ted,
Wikipedia is a great resource -- you just have to take what you read
there with a grain of salt. Many people writing there have an agenda,
and some are clueless. If you're reading about something
controversial, check the discussion pages; they can often point out
that there is a conflict in
6 matches
Mail list logo
