Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 10:25 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote: > The kernel this guy, ed00m[*1.], is offering has *nothing* to do with > Phoronix *or* Debian. The references to Debian and Phoronix are > deliberately deceptive, especially in the context (posting the > announcement to this list). Hence my

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:58:30 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:12 -0500, Celejar wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:46 +0100 > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > > * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 12/02/14 03:29, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: >> * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote: Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel? >>> >>> I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to upgrade kernels anyway? >> >>

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 20:36 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote: > So if there's a backdoor in your kernel images, show us the code. ;-) Source and binary could differ (not allowed, but they could differ illegally) and even if they won't, on kernel.org the source is under watching of a huge community, this

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Sven Joachim
On 2014-02-11 07:20 +0100, Pablo Zuñiga wrote: > We have completed the preparation of the 3.14-rc2 kernel, is cooked and > stored in > https://github.com/ed00m/kernel2Debian/tree/master/3.14/3.14-rc2-amd64 You might want to read the license of the Linux kernel, it states that if you distribute b

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:12 -0500, Celejar wrote: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:46 +0100 > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > > > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel?

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Celejar
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 17:29:46 +0100 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel? > > > > > > I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to up

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Ralf Mardorf
On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 10:05 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote: > > > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel? > > > > I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to upgrade kernels anyway? > > Indeed. Those needing cutting edge feat

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2014 11 Feb 07:20 -0600, Chris Bannister wrote: > > Any reason why people should *not* distrust this kernel? > > I was thinking the same thing. Why the rush to upgrade kernels anyway? Indeed. Those needing cutting edge features should only get the source from a known source such as kernel.o

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-11 Thread Chris Bannister
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 05:49:38PM +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote: > On 11/02/14 17:20, Pablo Zuñiga wrote: > > Dear, > > > > We > > Plural? (not one face painter?) > > > have completed the preparation of the 3.14-rc2 kernel, is cooked and > > stored in > > https://github.com/ed00m/kernel2Debian/

Re: [OT] kernel 3.14-rc2 for Testing

2014-02-10 Thread Scott Ferguson
On 11/02/14 17:20, Pablo Zuñiga wrote: > Dear, > > We Plural? (not one face painter?) > have completed the preparation of the 3.14-rc2 kernel, is cooked and > stored in > https://github.com/ed00m/kernel2Debian/tree/master/3.14/3.14-rc2-amd64 > > additional information > + http://www.phoronix.