On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:50:07PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I believe im currently blocked by Spamcop despite not being a spammer...
You are not being blocked by Spamcop. Stop thinking this. If you're
listed (which you're not, I just checked based on the headers; I'd
appreciate the effo
I believe im currently blocked by Spamcop despite not being a spammer...
McEwan Family
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:41:20 -0900 Andy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- Begin Message ---
> SpamCop is a rather arbitrarily-run service that has received a lot of
> criticism for blocking whole IP ranges, thereb
Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DvB wrote:
>
> > Kind of hard when your ISP is Yahoo! and you're not willing to pay for
> > their pop server :-)
>
> apt-get install fetchyahoo
>
> I've been using it for months in a cron job. Works quite nicely.
>
Awesome! Thanks :-)
--
To UNSUB
DvB wrote:
> Kind of hard when your ISP is Yahoo! and you're not willing to pay for
> their pop server :-)
apt-get install fetchyahoo
I've been using it for months in a cron job. Works quite nicely.
Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 02:04:48AM -0600, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> I'm sure no one would advocate illegal means of retribution against
> spamhausen.
Question: Is it in violation of any international laws to report to the
Chinese government a spammer inside thier borders along with the claim
that
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:15:23AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> > Kind of hard when your ISP is Yahoo! and you're not willing to pay for
> > their pop server :-) And, yes, I've written their support people and
> > requested being able to view messages w/o HTML. Th
On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 01:15:23AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> Kind of hard when your ISP is Yahoo! and you're not willing to pay for
> their pop server :-) And, yes, I've written their support people and
> requested being able to view messages w/o HTML. This, of course, seems
> kind of silly when your mai
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:41:20AM -0900, Andy wrote:
> That is good stuff to know but I still believe spam needs to be reported to
> the source network. If the ISP's don't know how they are being used by the
> spammers then how can they help stop the SPAM? Of course there will always
> be com
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:57:40AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> > The biggest problem with spamcop, and reporting spam in general, IMO,
> > is that you have to open the message in order to do so. Many spammers
> > nowdays have little notification mechanisms embedd
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:19:05PM -0600, DvB wrote:
> > Just disable HTML rendering completely. All you need is the headers and,
> > besides, anybody who sends you HTML formatted mail (unless it's your
> > boss) probably isn't worth listening to anyway ;
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 04:08:39PM -0500, Noah L. Meyerhans wrote:
> Well, only if it gets it right. I get messages from spamcop on a
> regular basis complaining that I'm running an open relay, when in fact
> what is happening is that a user has a .forward and the mail server is
> forwarding his m
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:15:40AM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
> SpamCop is a rather arbitrarily-run service that has received a lot of
> criticism for blocking whole IP ranges, thereby blocking tons of legit
> mail in the name of blocking a spammer or two who might also inhabit
> that IP range.
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 12:19:05PM -0600, DvB wrote:
> Just disable HTML rendering completely. All you need is the headers and,
> besides, anybody who sends you HTML formatted mail (unless it's your
> boss) probably isn't worth listening to anyway ;-)
No, you need the full message. Abuse desks an
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:57:40AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> The biggest problem with spamcop, and reporting spam in general, IMO,
> is that you have to open the message in order to do so. Many spammers
> nowdays have little notification mechanisms embedded in the HTML of
> their messages which sends an
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 02:50:44PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I know this is off-topic but since joining this list I'm getting
> increasing levels of Spam. I've heard that using SpamCop.net to process and
> report spam can help. Is this true? Is it worth bothering with?
Yes, but I think
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:41:20AM -0900, Andy wrote:
> I use SpamCop all the time (30 times a day + ) as a header analyzing engine.
> It does a great job of tracking the message source. Saves me hours every day
> so I don't have to manually track down the message source and upstream ISP.
> I t
> SpamCop is a rather arbitrarily-run service that has received a lot of
> criticism for blocking whole IP ranges, thereby blocking tons of legit
> mail in the name of blocking a spammer or two who might also inhabit
> that IP range. In particular, journalist Declan McCullagh's PoliTech
> mailing l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I know this is off-topic but since joining this list I'm getting
> increasing levels of Spam. I've heard that using SpamCop.net to process and
> report spam can help. Is this true? Is it worth bothering with?
SpamCop is a rather arbitrarily-run service that has recei
Brian McGroarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:57:40AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >I know this is off-topic but since joining this list I'm getting
> > > increasing levels of Spam. I've heard that using SpamCop.net to process an
Brian McGroarty wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:57:40AM -0600, DvB wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I know this is off-topic but since joining this list I'm getting
increasing levels of Spam. I've heard that using SpamCop.net to process and
report spam can help. Is this true? Is
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 09:57:40AM -0600, DvB wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > Hi,
> >I know this is off-topic but since joining this list I'm getting
> > increasing levels of Spam. I've heard that using SpamCop.net to process and
> > report spam can help. Is this true? Is it worth bot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hi,
>I know this is off-topic but since joining this list I'm getting
> increasing levels of Spam. I've heard that using SpamCop.net to process and
> report spam can help. Is this true? Is it worth bothering with?
>
The biggest problem with spamcop, and reporting
Spamassassin works great. I've set my block level to 5.7 I believe and
I think I get about 1 spam per day not-filtered. In the last 3 months I
haven't had a non-spam filtered. I'm also looking at a volume of about
500-800 valid messages per day (yeah, alot of lists).
Those are pretty good num
23 matches
Mail list logo
