Re: [OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-05 Thread Gonzalo A. Diethelm
On Sep 5, 1997, at 10:16, E.L. Meijer \(Eric\) wrote: > > Well, "remarks" are just that: comments the compiler has regarding > > some non-standard, perhaps non-portable and not-so-secure assumptions > > you MAY have made in your code. > > You didn't look carefully enough, or you don't unders

Re: [OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-05 Thread Alex Yukhimets
> > > > On Sep 4, 1997, at 09:10, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: > > > Jeff Gunter: > > > Wildly off topic, but a fun view into `commercial quality software', let > > > me show you the output of CC under IRIX 64 with the following > > > application: > > > > > > hw.cc: > > > ---

Re: [OFF TOPIC] was: Segfault in free()...C++

1997-09-05 Thread E.L. Meijer \(Eric\)
> > On Sep 4, 1997, at 09:10, E.L. Meijer (Eric) wrote: > > Jeff Gunter: > > Wildly off topic, but a fun view into `commercial quality software', let > > me show you the output of CC under IRIX 64 with the following > > application: > > > > hw.cc: > > -