Hi,
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 04:38:13AM +, Mike wrote:
> I was running `xen-create-image`…
Just a note that Xen is pretty exotic at this point and very few people
will know what you are talking about. I use Xen a lot, but most people
who play with VMs on Linux only use KVM/qemu. You may have m
On 2017-10-04 23:22 +0200, Uwe Mintermann wrote:
> I am facing the problem that no core files are written on my server
> (Debian GNU/Linux buster/sid).
>
> root:~# sysctl kernel.core_pattern
> kernel.core_pattern = |/usr/libexec/abrt-hook-ccpp %s %c %p %u %g %t e
> root:~# ls /usr/libexec/abrt-hoo
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 17:38:41 +0200, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:31:03 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
>> What's the output of "ls -l /sys/class/backlight"?
>>
>> If I follow the instructions of the section named "The /sys/class/
>> backlight interface" I can indeed see and set the
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 20:31:03 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
> What's the output of "ls -l /sys/class/backlight"?
>
> If I follow the instructions of the section named "The /sys/class/
> backlight interface" I can indeed see and set the backlight values as
> stated. For instance, to put the backligh
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 21:43:23 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:01:12 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
>> I'm running a Debian stock kernel (3.0.0-1) and neither have that entry
>> under "/proc/acpi" but can control the brigthness of my netbook either
>> from GNOME or using the hotk
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 15:01:12 + (UTC), Camaleón writes:
> I'm running a Debian stock kernel (3.0.0-1) and neither have that entry
> under "/proc/acpi" but can control the brigthness of my netbook either
> from GNOME or using the hotkeys.
>
> Maybe this Ubuntu debug guide for backlight can give
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:19:43 +0300, Volkan YAZICI wrote:
> I'm using a custom built vanilla Linux kernel of version 3.0.0. Despite
> I loaded every available ACPI related module, I still cannot see any
> "video" folder under /proc/acpi directory, hence I cannot alter display
> brigthness, etc. Any
Klistvud wrote:
Dne, 28. 10. 2009 16:46:47 je Klistvud napisal(a):
Dne, 28. 10. 2009 15:12:42 je Aioanei Rares napisal(a):
Klistvud wrote:
Howdy, fellow Debianites,
I have bumped into a most peculiar situation lately. On my laptop
(running a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I c
Dne, 28. 10. 2009 16:46:47 je Klistvud napisal(a):
> Dne, 28. 10. 2009 15:12:42 je Aioanei Rares napisal(a):
> > Klistvud wrote:
> > > Howdy, fellow Debianites,
> > >
> > > I have bumped into a most peculiar situation lately. On my laptop
> > > (running a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I can easi
Dne, 28. 10. 2009 15:12:42 je Aioanei Rares napisal(a):
> Klistvud wrote:
> > Howdy, fellow Debianites,
> >
> > I have bumped into a most peculiar situation lately. On my laptop
> > (running a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I can easily navigate
> into /
> > proc (both with Nautilus and Gnome-Com
Klistvud wrote:
Howdy, fellow Debianites,
I have bumped into a most peculiar situation lately. On my laptop
(running a fully updated Lenny with Gnome) I can easily navigate into /
proc (both with Nautilus and Gnome-Commander). When I try to run these
browsers with gksu or su, however, they nev
According to http://lartc.org/ chapter 13 you can find more info in
Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt of linux kernel documentation, and
they also mention http://ipsysctl-tutorial.frozentux.net/
2007/9/28, chloe K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi all
>
> How can I find out all info about /proc/net ?
chloe K([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi all
>
> How can I find out all info about /proc/net ?
>
> eg: rt_cache and softnet_stat are for what purpose
>
> Thank you
>
> -
> Be smarter than spam. See how smart SpamGuard is at giving
>
Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 03:23 +0100, Mirko Scurk wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Having problem with mixed debian woody/sarge with 2.4.27-2-386 kernel.
>> If I boot to single mode everything is just fine. Issuing from single
>> mode
>> "init 2" is also working OK. But when I boot regulary
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 03:23 +0100, Mirko Scurk wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Having problem with mixed debian woody/sarge with 2.4.27-2-386 kernel.
> If I boot to single mode everything is just fine. Issuing from single mode
> "init 2" is also working OK. But when I boot regulary I get error:
>
> Starting sys
On Thursday 30 Jun 2005 19:43, Martin Dickopp wrote:
> However, a mismatch does *not* necessarily indicate a "bug in the
> filesystem driver." It can also occur if directories are created or
> deleted between the time the hard link count is obtained and the time
> the number of subdirectories is ob
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Just got the following warning:
>>
>> find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc: this may be a bug in
>> your filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option.
>> Earlier results may have failed to include directori
> Just got the following warning:
>
> find: WARNING: Hard link count is wrong for /proc: this may be a bug in
> your
> filesystem driver. Automatically turning on find's -noleaf option.
> Earlier results may have failed to include directories that should have
> been searched.
>
> Is find just
Hello
Tong (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:59:09 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>
>> What, exactly, did you want to know?
>
> Hi, I just want my /proc/partitions to be of traditional format, or an
> sfdisk/fdisk that understands the new format.
To get the traditional format,
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 19:59:09 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> What, exactly, did you want to know?
Hi, I just want my /proc/partitions to be of traditional format, or an
sfdisk/fdisk that understands the new format.
Quoting my previous post:
,-
| >stefan:~$ cat /proc/partitions
|
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 09:52:51PM -0400, Tong wrote:
> That seems ok, similar to yours:
>
> $ tail /proc/ide/hd*/model
> ==> /proc/ide/hda/model <==
> Maxtor 6Y060L0
>
> ==> /proc/ide/hdb/model <==
> Maxtor 6Y160P0
>
> ==> /proc/ide/hdc/model <==
> SONY CD-RW CRX195E1
>
> ==> /proc/ide/hdd/mod
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 15:00:42 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>> Here is something I think might be relavent:
>>
>> $ lsmod | grep ide
>> ide-scsi8464 0 (autoclean)
>> scsi_mod 85312 2 (autoclean) [sd_mod ide-scsi]
>> ide-cd 27936 0
>> cdrom
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 05:41:26PM -0400, Tong wrote:
> Seems so. I accept everything default when installed as testing. How come
> I'm different than yours? Mine is:
>
> testing, 2.4.25-1-386, i686 GNU/Linux
Well, I'm using woody (and am consistently unable to upgrade to 2.4)
> > Maybe you upgra
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:04:39 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>> Mine is:
>>
>> % cat /proc/partitions
>> major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running
>> use aveq
>>
>>3 0 60051600 ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc 72159 136746 1668720 467190
>> 38303
On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 04:44:54PM -0400, Tong wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:25:42 -0700, Stefan O'Rear wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 04:13:23PM -0400, Tong wrote:
> Mine is:
>
> % cat /proc/partitions
> major minor #blocks name rio rmerge rsect ruse wio wmerge wsect wuse running
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Fri, 06 Aug 2004 13:39:52 +0800:
> Some years ago I used to boot off a Quantum LPS 170. It had some more
> stuff on it, probably /tmp.
>
> It died and managed to hang a couple of process.
>
> I manged to reconfigure the system without taking it down,
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> ...
> Hmm. So, the general consensus is that it's not a problem; and it
> certainly doesn't seem to affect interactivity or performance at all. It's
> my home box, not a server or anything, and it normally has very low loads,
> 10-15% maybe when I'm using it and essentiall
Tim Connors wrote:
If it stays in D for long continuously (as opposed to intermitently
and for a few seconds - eg. while accessing the disk), then there is
probably a kernel bug involved somewhere.
If however, the load goes away after some time, maybe it is not
something to worry about. Were you wa
Reid Priedhorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Thu, 05 Aug 2004 20:13:42 -0500:
> Hmm. So, the general consensus is that it's not a problem; and it
> certainly doesn't seem to affect interactivity or performance at all. It's
> my home box, not a server or anything, and it normally has very low loads,
On Tue, 03 Aug 2004 23:10:08 +0200, Paul Gear wrote:
>
> Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> /proc/loadavg currently reports the following:
>>
>> 0.96 0.98 0.78 1/116 23994
>>
>> xload also reports roughly the same.
>>
>> But top and ps both report a nearly idle system (98% idle)
Tim Connors wrote:
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:34:03 +0800:
Tim Connors wrote:
Oh - and the waiting 5 seconds for your bash *shell* to echo a single
character keypress. .
At present I'm working from home by dialup. I frequently run gvim as a
scra
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Wed, 04 Aug 2004 16:34:03 +0800:
> Tim Connors wrote:
> >Oh - and the waiting 5 seconds for your bash *shell* to echo a single
> >character keypress. .
>
> At present I'm working from home by dialup. I frequently run gvim as a
> scratch-pad from which
Tim Connors wrote:
As a test one day, I mounted nfs over the modem, and ran about 300
processes doing a find over the modem. CPU usage was ~10%, 15 minute
load was above 200 :)
On a RHL box (Pentium II 233, 128 Mbytes), logrotate decided it was
going to rotate indefinitely.
It was few days bef
Nate Duehr wrote:
> ...
> emacs!! Hey there's your problem right there! Teach those undergrads to code
> in vi and they'd have had lots more CPU and the box wouldn't have been
> swapping so much!
>
> (LOL! Sorry, it just *had* to be said just for tradition's sake!)
Hallelujah! Preach on,
On Tuesday 03 August 2004 22:08, Tim Connors wrote:
> At that time, I tried to help someone track down a missing brace in
> their C code, so I fired up emacs, waited 8 minutes, pressed C-x h
> C-M-\ and waited for another half hour before giving up and leaving
> her to fend for herself :)
emacs!!
Paul Gear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said on Wed, 04 Aug 2004 07:03:12 +1000:
> This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
> --enig162A5A009C607900848B2DE4
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>
> Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> > Hello ever
Edvard Majakari wrote:
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As such, load averages below 1 mean system doesn't have any processes
(except perhaps the one being run) waiting to be served.
I believe it includes the one running.
.96 is very far from idle.
Yes, that's why I put
Nate Duehr wrote:
On Aug 3, 2004, at 11:12 AM, John Summerfield wrote:
I/I activity can push the load average up too: a high load average
does not mean the CPU is busy, though it often is.
Is that a typo John, I think you meant "I/O" as in input/output...
correct?
Indeed I do. I'm really not a
Greg Folkert wrote:
> ...
> Or how about a multi-threaded App server running hundreds(thousands in
> some cases) of servlets a minute... I admin'd a 32 Processor, 32GB of
> Memory machine that was capable of running a couple of thousand servlets
> a minute.
>
> The load average on this machine usu
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 17:03, Paul Gear wrote:
> Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > /proc/loadavg currently reports the following:
> >
> > 0.96 0.98 0.78 1/116 23994
> >
> > xload also reports roughly the same.
> >
> > But top and ps both report a nearly idle system (98% idle)
Reid Priedhorsky wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> /proc/loadavg currently reports the following:
>
> 0.96 0.98 0.78 1/116 23994
>
> xload also reports roughly the same.
>
> But top and ps both report a nearly idle system (98% idle). What is going
> on? How can I find out what is causing my system
John Summerfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>As such, load averages below 1 mean system doesn't have any processes
>>(except perhaps the one being run) waiting to be served.
>>
>>
>>
> I believe it includes the one running.
> .96 is very far from idle.
Yes, that's why I put the "(except perhaps
On Aug 3, 2004, at 11:12 AM, John Summerfield wrote:
I/I activity can push the load average up too: a high load average
does not mean the CPU is busy, though it often is.
Is that a typo John, I think you meant "I/O" as in input/output...
correct?
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
Edvard Majakari wrote:
Reid Priedhorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
/proc/loadavg currently reports the following:
0.96 0.98 0.78 1/116 23994
xload also reports roughly the same.
But top and ps both report a nearly idle system (98% idle). What is going
on? How can I find out what is causing my
Reid Priedhorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> /proc/loadavg currently reports the following:
>
> 0.96 0.98 0.78 1/116 23994
>
> xload also reports roughly the same.
>
> But top and ps both report a nearly idle system (98% idle). What is going
> on? How can I find out what is causing my system t
No, it wasn't. I added that line and it worked.
Thanks!
On Thursday 15 July 2004 11:44, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Is the following in /etc/fstab?
>
> none/proc/bus/usb usbdevfs defaults 0 0
>
>
> --
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:44:41PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Is the following in /etc/fstab?
>
> none/proc/bus/usb usbdevfs defaults 0 0
I thought it was "usbfs"... Hmmm looking in a 2.4.23
Doc../usb/proc_usb_info.txt document:
**NOTE**: If /proc/bus/usb app
Is the following in /etc/fstab?
none/proc/bus/usb usbdevfs defaults 0 0
--
Andrew J Perrin - http://www.unc.edu/~aperrin
Assistant Professor of Sociology, U of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
[EMAIL
ux Soleil 2.4.25 #3 SMP mar mar 2 15:49:56 CET 2004 i686 unknown
>
>
> # dpkg -l libc6* | grep ii
> ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
> ii libc6-dev 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea
--
-Original Message-
Incoming from Jan Minar:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 12:25:08AM +0100, Martin Dickopp wrote:
> >
> > Yes, /proc is quite different from other filesystems in many ways. :)
>
> Is it documented? I wasn't able to find anything. Particularly,
Anything? You didn't install man pages? "man proc" work
On Sunday 21 December 2003 12:25, Jeff Penn wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 08:57:25PM +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> > >> The reason for this can be that you have devfs enabled in your
> > >> kernel, but are not using it.
> > >
> > > That makes sense. I noticed a rant about the need for devfs i
On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 08:57:25PM +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> >> The reason for this can be that you have devfs enabled in your
> >> kernel, but are not using it.
> > That makes sense. I noticed a rant about the need for devfs in
> > CD-Writing-HOWTO-2.html at linux.org. Perhaps I should be
Hello
Richard Lyons (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> On Friday 19 December 2003 13:51, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> [...]
>> The reason for this can be that you have devfs enabled in your
>> kernel, but are not using it.
>
> That makes sense. I noticed a rant about the need for devfs in
> CD-Writing-
On Friday 19 December 2003 13:51, Andreas Janssen wrote:
[...]
> The reason for this can be that you have devfs enabled in your
> kernel, but are not using it.
That makes sense. I noticed a rant about the need for devfs in
CD-Writing-HOWTO-2.html at linux.org. Perhaps I should be using it,
the
Hello
Richard Lyons (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I just ran lilo (to make 2.4.22 default) and got an error message that
> sounds serious:
> Warning:'/proc/partitions' does not match '/dev' directory
> structure.
> Name change: '/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disc' ->
> '/dev/hda
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian P. Flaherty) writes:
> Today I built my own kernel 2.4.21 and when I run lilo, I get the
> following message:
>
> Warning: '/proc/partitions' does not match '/dev' directory structure.
>Name change: '/dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/disk' -> '/dev/hda'
>The kenrel
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 10:11:03 -0600, Blunier, Mark wrote:
>> Ummm yeah... this is a problem that was covered a few weeks back.
>> Basically they never figured out what was happeneing or why it was
>
>rm -rf /proc
>mkdir /proc
>
>Seemed to fix the problem. I switched from ext2 to a reiserfs.
>To ma
> Scott Henson wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 10:17, Blunier, Mark wrote:
> > When I run ps as root, it hangs. When I run mount, it shows
> > proc is mounted, but I cant remount it, and I can mount it a
> > second time. After I mount it the second time, then things
> > work as usual.
>
> U
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 10:17, Blunier, Mark wrote:
> When I run ps as root, it hangs. When I run mount, it shows
> proc is mounted, but I cant remount it, and I can mount it a
> second time. After I mount it the second time, then things
> work as usual.
Ummm yeah... this is a problem that was cov
on Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:12:07AM -0500, Mullins, Ron ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Andrej Hocevar wrote:
>
> >did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or
> >was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question
>
> It would seem just a little of both. ;) Karsten
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:12:07AM -0500, Mullins, Ron wrote:
> Andrej Hocevar wrote:
>
> >did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or
> >was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question
>
> It would seem just a little of both. ;) Karsten is often brusque in
Andrej Hocevar wrote:
>did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or
>was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question
It would seem just a little of both. ;) Karsten is often brusque in
requesting list etiquette be observed. I will share a better way to change
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 01:51:30PM +, andrej hocevar wrote:
> dear karsten,
> did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or
> was it just me reacting prickly?
I did not read all of this thread. But I can assure you Karsten is a
nice fellow with some wits.
> > Please use
dear karsten,
did you deliberately insult me with your self-boasting remarks or
was it just me reacting prickly? to me it seems that my question
was pretty much clear and thus your reply does not make much sense.
it's happened before to me that someone didn't like my subject in
connection with the
on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 10:53:07AM +, andrej hocevar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 08:01:12PM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:19:35PM +, andrej hocevar ([EMAIL
> > PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > lately i've inherited my brother's rockwell mode
so now i've found out that there's also the /proc/sys/proc directory
to which one should be able to write and thus make modifications to
the system. since it is empty, do i just have to create a new file
with the name /proc/sys/proc/pci and append only the lines i first wanted
to add to /proc/pci?
on Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 02:19:35PM +, andrej hocevar ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> lately i've inherited my brother's rockwell modem, which is a hsf,
> meaning, as far as i know, it's a winmodem. so i took a look a
> http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Conexant+Rockwell-modem-HOWTO/hsf.html
> the ins
Regards!
Finally i got it working after using the link on metalink.oracle.com you
need access to go there , anyhow here is the solution:
START OF DOCUMENT
Doc ID: Note:102288.1
Subject: PCC-2015 and PCC-2201 when Compiling Sample Pro*C Programs on
Linux
Type: PROBLEM
St
Bashar wrote:
>
> Regards,
> I've installed Oracle 8.1.7 perfectly and working fine but when i
> installed
> ProC compiler it gave me error when compiling one of the sample codes as
> below:
> make -f /home/oracle/OraHome1/precomp/demo/proc/demo_proc.mk OBJS=sample1.o
> EXE=sample1 build
After a quick search on google, I found the following links. Hope they can
help you out.
http://www.freeos.com/articles/2879/
http://www.linuxhq.com/kernel/v2.3/doc/filesystems/proc.txt.html
and you can also 'man proc'.
On Sunday 29 July 2001 23:20, louiemiranda wrote:
> anyone know a link whe
Renai LeMay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RL> can someone tell me what the file /proc/kcore is used for?
The /proc filesystem consists entirely of virtual files created by the
kernel for various purposes. kcore happens to be an image of the
system memory; it's probably useful for kernel debugging.
Quoting Renai LeMay ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> can someone tell me what the file /proc/kcore is used for?
Not really, but I can tell you what it is. It's a kernel
representation of your system memory, made to look like
a file, as is everything in /proc. Take a look at
Documentation/proc.txt in the
On Tue, Apr 10, 2001 at 08:18:01AM -0400, Shawn Garbett wrote:
> I don't seem to have much in the /proc directory. In fiddling with alsa,
> apm, etc, the HOWTO's will mention checking things in /proc. I go there
> and there's nothing. How do I go about getting everything I possibly can
> under /
On 16-Feb-2001 David M. Anderson wrote:
> I am running Debian 2.2 (potato) with the exception of having compiled
> the 2.4.1 kernel.
>
> MAKEDEV chokes, with the output:
> /sbin/MAKEDEV: major_usbtts%d=188: command not found
>
> I believe the problem is with line 150 of the script, and due to t
> Where can I find information on the hardware settings and certain
> software settings (swap space, TCP/IP) settings that are run-time
> configurable in the /proc filesystem?
If you have the kernel source, check out /usr/src/linux/Documentation/sysctl
and also check the manual page for sysctl.
Each block is 2 sectors, or 1024 bytes (1k)
To convert #blocks to MB, just divide it by 1024.
Example: 8001 blocks as shown in /proc/partitions would be 7.81 MB.
Tom
ktb wrote:
>
> I'm looking at the /proc/partitions file and it lists "block" sizes.
> I've been looking on the web, archives, do
Quoting Michael P. Soulier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 05:43:29PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
>
> > If you need the number when it's not in use, get it from the
> > intr line in /proc/stat (first number is total).
>
> Wow. How do I read that? Off to the proc manpage for me.
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 05:43:29PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> If you need the number when it's not in use, get it from the
> intr line in /proc/stat (first number is total).
Wow. How do I read that? Off to the proc manpage for me.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROT
Quoting Michael P. Soulier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> So, out of curiousity as I'm helping a friend with her interrupts, I look
> at mine.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] msoulier]$ cat /proc/interrupts
>CPU0
> 0:3791558 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 18949 XT-PIC key
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000 at 02:23:58PM +0200, Pierfrancesco Caci wrote:
> Yes, unless you (or some daemon) uses the corresponding interrupt, you
> won't see the counts here. Nut you can see the memory regions
> allocated in the ioports file.
Yup, just tested that by dialing somewhere. Setserial r
:-> "Michael" == Michael P Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] msoulier]$ cat /proc/interrupts
>CPU0
> 0:3791558 XT-PIC timer
> 1: 18949 XT-PIC keyboard
> 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
> 8:
the line is
none /proc proc defaults 0 0
Alexandre Devaure
--
De :Angus Claydon[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date d'envoi : jeudi 22 avril 1999 18:40
A : debian-user@lists.debian.org
Objet : proc line in fstab
Could anyone who's online just now let me know what the proc line sho
On Thursday 22 April, Angus Claydon wrote:
> Could anyone who's online just now let me know what the proc line should
> look like in /etc/fstab ?. Unfortunately I messed it up
> and none of modules are loading correctly.
like this;
proc/proc proc defaults
Hi,
man 5 proc lists most of the entries, though it's a little out of date.
Surely there's a more thorough description somewhere, perhaps in the
kernel source?
HTH,
Havoc Pennington
On Thu, 11 Dec 1997, Kevin Traas wrote:
> Can anyone point me to docs/info on the /proc directory. Specifi
Brian Mays wrote:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Phillips) writes:
>
> > Can you tell, just by looking at /proc/interrupts, whether there is an
> > interrupt conflict?
> >
> > In particular, how does it work for pcmcia cards for a laptop?
>
> Well, let's take a look. Here's what my /proc/interrupt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mark Phillips) writes:
> Can you tell, just by looking at /proc/interrupts, whether there is an
> interrupt conflict?
>
> In particular, how does it work for pcmcia cards for a laptop?
Well, let's take a look. Here's what my /proc/interrupts says:
0:3736694 timer
1:
86 matches
Mail list logo
