Re: /etc/modules not loading b43

2014-05-07 Thread Kent West
On 05/07/2014 11:19 AM, Slavko wrote: Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 06 May 2014 17:46:29 -0500 Kent West napísal: I'm running Debian jessie/sid (3.14-1-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.14.2-1 (2014-04-28) i686 GNU/Linux) on a MacBook (older white model). It has the Broadcom BCM4321 wireless chipset (arg! non-free!)

Re: /etc/modules not loading b43

2014-05-07 Thread Slavko
Ahoj, Dňa Tue, 06 May 2014 17:46:29 -0500 Kent West napísal: > I'm running Debian jessie/sid (3.14-1-686-pae #1 SMP Debian 3.14.2-1 > (2014-04-28) i686 GNU/Linux) on a MacBook (older white model). > > It has the Broadcom BCM4321 wireless chipset (arg! non-free!). > > When I boot, the b43 modu

Re: /etc/modules not loading b43

2014-05-06 Thread filip
On Tue, 06 May 2014 17:46:29 -0500 Kent West wrote: > > How can I get the module to load at startup instead of me having to > manually modprobe it every time? > > Thanks! > Try this: - On a freshly booted system, run modprobe -v b43 - Add the printed modules in /etc/modules the same orde

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-22 Thread David Jardine
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 10:05:05AM -0600, s. keeling wrote: > Incoming from David Jardine: > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > > David Jardine wrote: > > > > > > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to > > > >start, but I'm sur

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-22 Thread s. keeling
Incoming from David Jardine: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > > David Jardine wrote: > > > > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to > > >start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain. > > > >It is really easy to

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread David Jardine
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:08:02PM -0400, Kamaraju Kusumanchi wrote: > David Jardine wrote: > > >I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to > >start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain. > > > > > > Hey, > >It is really easy to file a bug report. Just

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread Kamaraju Kusumanchi
David Jardine wrote: I've never had the courage to file a bug and wouldn't know where to start, but I'm sure someone else on the list can explain. Hey, It is really easy to file a bug report. Just install reportbug package and it will do all the 'dirty' work. You need to have an active

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread David Jardine
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 09:01:05AM -0400, Peter Jay Salzman wrote: > On Sat 21 May 05, 8:30 AM, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote: > > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > > > > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/m

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Sat 21 May 05, 8:30 AM, Carl Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote: > > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > > > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that > > > nything after '#' is ing

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread Carl Fink
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 01:53:28PM +0200, David Jardine wrote: > On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that > > nything after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines which BEGIN > > with '#' are ignored

Re: /etc/modules comment is wrong

2005-05-21 Thread David Jardine
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:25:21AM +0200, Jacobo221 wrote: > In Debian Sarge, in /etc/modules out-of-the-box, the comments say that > nything after '#' is ingored. But this is wrong. Only lines which BEGIN with > '#' are ignored. This should be changed. Hmm. 'Comments begin with a "#", and ever

Re: /etc/modules after a new kernel compile

2004-01-07 Thread Claudio Bley
On 2004-01-07, Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Under the old kernel - 2.4.18-bf2.4 - I had used modconf to add-in the > following modules: > > usb-uhciinput > usbkbd keybdev > agpgart mousedev > sg maestro3 > usbmouseusb-storage > binfmt_aou

Re: /etc/modules after a new kernel compile

2004-01-07 Thread Andreas Janssen
Hello Kevin Coyner (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > After migrating over from that other OS a couple years ago, I've > finally taken the plunge and recompiled my own kernel using debian > kernel package. Everything went smoothly and I'm now running 2.4.23. > I should have done it much sooner. K

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-22 Thread Shyamal Prasad
"J" == J F Gratton writes: J> I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently J> but I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf. J> All I did so far to get modules to load and to work was to put J> them into /etc/modules. J> What is the use of

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-21 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 10:58:12PM -0500, J.F.Gratton wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:27, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > /etc/modules is used by Debian to manually add modules the user/sysadmin > > wishes to load at boot time. After adding them, you then run > > 'update-modules' as root, whic

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-20 Thread John Schmidt
On Thursday 20 February 2003 8:58 pm, J.F.Gratton wrote: > On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:27, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > > /etc/modules is used by Debian to manually add modules the > > user/sysadmin wishes to load at boot time. After adding them, you > > then run 'update-modules' as root, which re

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-20 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Saturday, 22 February 2003, 01:59 AM +1100): > Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > >-- J.F.Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > >(on Thursday, 20 February 2003, 09:53 PM -0500): > > > >>I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but ...

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-20 Thread Russell Shaw
Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: -- J.F.Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 20 February 2003, 09:53 PM -0500): I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf. All I did so far to get modules to load and to work

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-20 Thread J.F.Gratton
On Thu, 2003-02-20 at 22:27, Matthew Weier O'Phinney wrote: > /etc/modules is used by Debian to manually add modules the user/sysadmin > wishes to load at boot time. After adding them, you then run > 'update-modules' as root, which reads this, as well as some files in > /etc/modutils/, to *create*

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-20 Thread Russell Shaw
J.F.Gratton wrote: Good evening, I might have missed that one, concerning /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and modutils.. What does what in there ? I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf. All I did so far to get m

Re: /etc/modules, /etc/modules.conf and others

2003-02-20 Thread Matthew Weier O'Phinney
-- J.F.Gratton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote (on Thursday, 20 February 2003, 09:53 PM -0500): > I might be using workarounds or not using my system effeciently but > I've never had to tamper with /etc/modules.conf. > > All I did so far to get modules to load and to work was to put them into > /et

Re: /etc/modules does not exists

2001-10-19 Thread Michael C. Alonzo
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 01:41:48PM +0200, THIVENT Pascal wrote: > Hello, > > I'm using potato with a 2.4.12 kernel. > At boot time, I can see a message like this one : > > #dmesg > ... > cat /etc/modules: no such file > ... > > I don't remember having deleted this file but, indeed, this file is

Re: /etc/modules does not exists

2001-10-19 Thread Hans Ekbrand
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 01:41:48PM +0200, THIVENT Pascal wrote: > Could someone tell me the structure, permissions, ownership of this file. > Is is possible to generate this file or do I have to do it by hand ? > > It would be nice to recieve a /etc/modules in order to take a look at it :) > > Th

Re: /etc/modules does not exists

2001-10-19 Thread J.A.Serralheiro
sorry for the third message:) see also man modules.conf

Re: /etc/modules does not exists

2001-10-19 Thread J.A.Serralheiro
here's my /etc/modules I load modules sb for awe32 sound card # /etc/modules: kernel modules to load at boot time. # # This file should contain the names of kernel modules that are # to be loaded at boot time, one per line. Comments begin with # a `#', and everything on the line after them are

Re: /etc/modules does not exists

2001-10-19 Thread J.A.Serralheiro
well theres nothing special about this file. If you dont have it, the most it can happen is that some modules are not loaded. The file /etc/modules has in it ( one per line) the modules names of the modules which you want to load automatically at startup. Do you have any problem about unloaded modu

Re: /etc/modules vs. kmod/modules.conf

2001-07-06 Thread Joost Kooij
On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 08:18:44PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote: > what is the preferred method of loading modules? i guess /etc/modules > will be the answer because of tool like modconf, but i don't generally > use debian kernels or modconf, so i am interested on what you have to > say. There is

Re: /etc/modules load/don't load

2000-07-31 Thread David Z Maze
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: KW> So my question is: Why are the vfat and serial and smbfs loading when KW> they are commented out of /etc/modules, but the 3c59x module does not KW> load when it's commented out? Because kmod doesn't know that your Ethernet card is a 3c59x. When it tries

Re: /etc/modules

1998-11-24 Thread Martin Bialasinski
>> "RR" == Robert Rati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RR> Does anyone have the default /etc/modules file? Tia. There is no such thing. You most likely need to load other modules then I have to. One thing to do is to just have "auto" in the file. This will enable the kerneld, which will autoload n

Re: /etc/modules

1998-03-19 Thread Alexander Kushnirenko
Hi, Graham! I have the similar problem which I cured by modifying /etc/init.d/modutils to allow calculation of module dependencies first. ( I do not no much about this mechanism, but why it's not a default behaviour? Just wondering) Here: # # If you want to re-calculate the dependencies e