On Friday, 20 January 2006 at 15:53:35 +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> Bruno Beaufils wrote:
> >I can reproduce exactly the same behavior with an even more simple file :
> >
> >--
> >\documentclass{article}
> >\begin{do
Bruno Beaufils wrote:
I can reproduce exactly the same behavior with an even more simple file :
--
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
j
\end{document}
---
On Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:40:24 +0100, Bruno Beaufils <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I used gs-esp.
>
> I tried with gs-afpl and it does not change anything, exactly the same
> behavior. I did just a small test since I do not have a lot of time. I will
> follow this track more seriously tonight and r
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 10:47:04AM +0100, Johannes Wiedersich wrote:
> It's not necessarily a tex or tetex problem (in fact quite probably
> not). Your dvi file is converted by ghostscript to ps and then to pdf.
> IIRC, there are about three different versions of gs available for
> debian. When
On Friday, 20 January 2006 at 2:30:06 +0100, Bruno Beaufils wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:06:20AM +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> > '-Poutline'. But since dvips uses outline fonts by default, this file
>
> I do not remember why I use the config.outline file but I think it is because
> at a cer
Bruno Beaufils wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:06:20AM +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
Could you provide a *minimal* example file (shouldn't be longer than a
few lines) with which you get Type 3 fonts, even though you have
cm-super installed? That would help finding the reason for this.
Here it
Bruno Beaufils wrote:
Is there a place where recent changes in TeX packages are documented ?
I ask that because since some times all my pdf produced files are unreadable
by people using Acrobat Reader, and even xpdf sends me insults about some
bad bounding box in Type 3 glyph (Error: Bad boundin
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 12:06:20AM +0100, Ralf Stubner wrote:
> '-Poutline'. But since dvips uses outline fonts by default, this file
I do not remember why I use the config.outline file but I think it is because
at a certain time dvips did not use outline fonts by defaut and that was the
only solu
On Thursday, 19 January 2006 at 23:34:27 +0100, Bruno Beaufils wrote:
> Is there a place where recent changes in TeX packages are documented ?
>
> I ask that because since some times all my pdf produced files are unreadable
> by people using Acrobat Reader, and even xpdf sends me insults about som
9 matches
Mail list logo
