Last state;
root@mx04:/etc/racoon# racoonctl show-event
reload-config : x.x.x.x[500] -> x.x.x.x[500]
Phase 1 deleted : x.x.x.x[500] -> x.x.x.x[500]
Phase 1 established : x.x.x.x[500] -> x.x.x.x[500]
Phase 1 mode configuration done : x.x.x.x[500] -> x.x.x.x.[500]
On Tue, Sep 30, 2
In addition to the logs;
Sep 29 21:46:02 mx04 racoon: [x.x.x.x] ERROR: couldn't find the pskey
for x.x.x.x. │
Sep 29 21:46:02 mx04 racoon: [x.x.x.x] ERROR: failed to process ph1
packet (side: 1, status: 4).
│
Sep 29 21:46:02 mx04 r
Hello
>What do you get in the logs?
>For a "connection" (by which I assume you mean an established tunnel)
>to be established, racoon needs to the the handshakes with the other
>side - if these fail, there should be traces of it in the
>logs.
Debian racoon Logs;
Sep
Hi
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 08:30:31PM +0300, Gokan Atmaca wrote:
> Hello
>
> I want to make using racoon IPSEC connection. My configuration is as
> follows. B site RouterOS (Mikrotik) are available. A kind of
> connection can not be established.
What do you get in the logs?
Fo
Hello
I want to make using racoon IPSEC connection. My configuration is as
follows. B site RouterOS (Mikrotik) are available. A kind of
connection can not be established.
Note: IP addresses are shown as examples.
WAN sites: 1.1.1.1
LAN sites: 2.2.2.2
B's: 3.3.3.3
B's: 4.4.4.4
Hi,
Is it me, or why does the following racoon-tool.conf file generate only
partial output (global section) to /var/lib/racoon/racoon.conf?
v.0.5.2-1 on Sarge/stable.
<---
# Syslog level and x509 certs path
global:
log: debug
path_certificate: /etc/racoon/certs
# Valid for all connecti
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana wrote:
> Branch1:
> Lan: 192.168.0.0/24
> Central:
> Lan: 192.168.100.0/24
> Branch2:
> Lan: 192.168.2.0/24
Last time I had such problems, I created one tunnel per network prefix. It
was needed because the VPN gateways we were
Hi all, I'm trying to configure a custom's VPN network with Debian 3.1r1 +
ipsec-tools 0.6.4 and a kernel 2.6.15 with native IPSEC support.
I've able to configure racoon and the remote routers (Draytek Vigor 2500) to
stablish the VPN tunnel between the Vigor and the Debian machi
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 03:32, Jeff Stevens wrote:
> Anders,
>
> Our situations differ a bit, however I've found Debian's racoon package
> to be quite useful. I just use it to encrypt all traffic between two
> hosts that use NFS and XDMCP on my LAN. Who says NFS can
Anders,
Our situations differ a bit, however I've found Debian's racoon package
to be quite useful. I just use it to encrypt all traffic between two
hosts that use NFS and XDMCP on my LAN. Who says NFS can't be secure in
transit? I also only use PSKs and haven't bothered w
the field of
tunnelling and automatic keying?
Is IPsec and Racoon what I want? Which alternatives exist?
Are there any common sources of error in this field, that I should be aware
of?
Anything else worth mentioning?
I should mention, that I have tried the IPsec HOWTO by Ralf Spenneberg, but
Hi folks,
I am using debain unstable with kernel 2.6.4.1 SMP, racoon 2.4.3. and try to do
host to host IPsec, always get the error:
isakmp_parsewoh(): invalid length of payload
though the manual IPSEC is ok using sample from http://www.ipsec-howto.org/t1.html.
anyone has some clue
Hi
This is a little OT for debian-user but i hope here are some with the native
kernel 2.5/2.6 implementation of IPSec
Im not sure if i got the real purpose of racoon.
I have here debian unstable with kernel 2.6.0-test8 and ipsec-tools 0.2.2
installed. I'd like to establish a VPN connecti
13 matches
Mail list logo
