Re: RFCs...

2001-11-04 Thread dman
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 01:43:00PM +0800, Michael C. Alonzo wrote: | may i propose that the debian-RFC package should be divided by subject, | e.g, all RFC(standard) concerning mail should be in RFC/standard/mail/ subdirectory and | RFCs(best-current-practice) concerning TCP should be in | RFC

Re: RFCs...

2001-11-04 Thread Jens Müller
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why not make this request to the maintainer via a wishlist bug? It would > definately make searching through rfcs go faster. Searching through RFCs should be done by looking into STD-1. Also, ht://dig (or how

Re: RFCs...

2001-11-04 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 04-Nov-2001 Michael C. Alonzo wrote: > may i propose that the debian-RFC package should be divided by subject, > e.g, all RFC(standard) concerning mail should be in RFC/standard/mail/ > subdirectory and > RFCs(best-current-practice) concerning TCP should be in > RFC/best-c

RFCs...

2001-11-03 Thread Michael C. Alonzo
may i propose that the debian-RFC package should be divided by subject, e.g, all RFC(standard) concerning mail should be in RFC/standard/mail/ subdirectory and RFCs(best-current-practice) concerning TCP should be in RFC/best-current-practice/networking/tcp folder. reading RFCs (especially if you