On Sun, Apr 08, 2001 at 08:38:21PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > Yes there are people still using libsvga support and there even are
> > packages that depend on it like bmv (a postscript viewer for console
> > that is maintained by me and that is still actively developed).
> > Therefore, please d
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:07:16PM +0200, Dr. Guenter Bechly wrote:
> Yes there are people still using libsvga support and there even are
> packages that depend on it like bmv (a postscript viewer for console
> that is maintained by me and that is still actively developed).
> Therefore, please do n
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:47:16AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Just wanted to ask if anybody is still using the libsvga support of the
> Debian GS packages. I really would like to get rid of that ugly hack
> and if nobody speaks up one of the next uploads will have svga supp
On Wed, Apr 04, 2001 at 09:35:14PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> I think it'd be really nice if you could get framebuffer support, since
> svga doesn't even relate to most of my systems anyway :)
Right, that would be a nice replacement to svga support. I am looking
into it.
Thanks
Torste
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 02:47:16AM +0200, Torsten Landschoff wrote:
> Hi *,
>
> Just wanted to ask if anybody is still using the libsvga support of the
> Debian GS packages. I really would like to get rid of that ugly hack
> and if nobody speaks up one of the next uploads will have svga support
>
Hi *,
Just wanted to ask if anybody is still using the libsvga support of the
Debian GS packages. I really would like to get rid of that ugly hack
and if nobody speaks up one of the next uploads will have svga support
removed.
Comments?
Torsten (Ghostscript Maintainer)
pgps9E8Mcsw3B.p
6 matches
Mail list logo
