-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 08:11:08AM +0900, Mark Fletcher wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > reading more about Gmail Smart Reply in
> >
> > https://www.blog.google/products/gmail/save-time-with-s
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> reading more about Gmail Smart Reply in
> https://www.blog.google/products/gmail/save-time-with-smart-reply-in-gmail/
> i got a new theory:
>
> The AI learns from the user's mail habits to be able to propose three
> quick
From: geo...@nsup.org
>Le nonidi 19 thermidor, an CCXXV, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
>> Further, if this spam shall sneak through spam filters, why does nearly
>> all of it bear that peculiar URL domain ?
>
>Because that is the URL that the spammer wants to advertise, of course.
Not true, look closely
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 03:30:41PM -0400, Fungi4All wrote:
> >Clever. Yes, going by the headers, those seem genuine replies to spam.
>
> > The spam is crafted in a way (cc) that the reply lands here (for the
> > spammer, this distribution channel is w
>Clever. Yes, going by the headers, those seem genuine replies to spam.
> The spam is crafted in a way (cc) that the reply lands here (for the
> spammer, this distribution channel is what they want). The Goozim
> bit seems compelling :)
> Cheers
> -- t
I am confident that the reply is the spam, b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 04:58:42PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> reading more about Gmail Smart Reply in
> https://www.blog.google/products/gmail/save-time-with-smart-reply-in-gmail/
> i got a new theory:
>
> The AI learns from the user's
Nicolas George writes:
> Debian's are part of the few tech mailing-lists that I know that are not
> moderated for posts by non-users.
It's also one of the few that are publically-archived with no
obfuscation of email addresses.
I doubt that spammers utilize any fiedish schemes to attack
debian-us
Hi,
reading more about Gmail Smart Reply in
https://www.blog.google/products/gmail/save-time-with-smart-reply-in-gmail/
i got a new theory:
The AI learns from the user's mail habits to be able to propose three
quick replies in the personal writing style of the user.
If you annoy the AI from out
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 03:56:35PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote:
> Your Occam's razor is definitely blunted. These mails are spams
> masquerading as legitimate answers to bypass automated filters and catch
> the reader's attention, nothing more. That is the simplest explanation,
> consistent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Aug 06, 2017 at 10:35:56PM +1000, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Seems there's a fair bit of responding to what is evidently spam, so
> perhaps it's been a while since an old-hand explained these ropes:
The person having responded "stop" to that mai
Le nonidi 19 thermidor, an CCXXV, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
> This theory does not explain why it is so focused on debian-user,
> where it is very unlikely to find a receptive audience.
Debian's are part of the few tech mailing-lists that I know that are not
moderated for posts by non-users.
> Fur
Hi,
Nicolas George wrote:
> Well, I have never seen any hint of that kind of feature.
As for sprit of our days:
https://techcrunch.com/2017/05/17/google-brings-smart-replies-to-gmail-on-ios-and-android/
https://www.theverge.com/2017/7/26/16000562/easilydo-edison-mail-app-email-smart-reply-
Le nonidi 19 thermidor, an CCXXV, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
> No. But it would match the spirit of our days and it would explain
> why we see erratic replies to slimy but quite redundant originals.
Well, I have never seen any hint of that kind of feature. Therefore,
until somebody produces evidence
Hi,
Nicolas George wrote:
> Do you have any evidence that this kind of button exists?
No. But it would match the spirit of our days and it would explain
why we see erratic replies to slimy but quite redundant originals.
Also, many of the replies bear the signatures of mobile devices which
are mo
Le nonidi 19 thermidor, an CCXXV, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
> Open question is whether there are
> humans who press a Go-Away button on their smart phones or whether these
> replies are part of the spam scheme.
Do you have any evidence that this kind of button e
Hi,
Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> - Debian's lists are very well spam-protected
Not that well, given that this strange stuff gets through since
weeks although it could be easily recognized by the peculiar URL,
which you quoted, too.
> - The one or two that get through, is incredibly low in volume
On 8/6/17, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
> Seems there's a fair bit of responding to what is evidently spam, so
> perhaps it's been a while since an old-hand explained these ropes:
>
> < snipped to get straight to the targeted point >
>
> - Actually responding to such spam emails, e.g. "stop", "what do
Seems there's a fair bit of responding to what is evidently spam, so
perhaps it's been a while since an old-hand explained these ropes:
- Debian's lists are very well spam-protected - the (extremely) few
spam emails that gets through, are incredibly low in volume,
compared to wh
18 matches
Mail list logo
