Re: Xen backup and restore

Hello, On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 09:27:27AM +0100, Toth Zoltan wrote: > I am looking for a solution to backup and restore xen domU under > debian, but I did not anything. What does "backup and restore" mean to you in this context? Describe a scenario and what you would like to happen. Depending on

Re: Xen backup and restore

On Wed, 7 Dec 2022, Toth Zoltan wrote: Hi Everybody I am looking for a solution to backup and restore xen domU under debian, but I did not anything. How can I save and restore xen virtual machine. I have found "xe" command, but it cant find deb package only rpm :-( Can somobody help me ? I t

Re: Re: XEN domU: Guest Rx stalled, unreachable

Hello, On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 04:35:51PM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 10:11:30PM +0100, Felix Odenkirchen wrote: > > A udev update changed the interface name for virtual network devices > > from "eth0" to "enX0" (using persistent block device naming scheme), > > https://

Re: Re: XEN domU: Guest Rx stalled, unreachable

On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 10:11:30PM +0100, Felix Odenkirchen wrote: > A udev update changed the interface name for virtual network devices > from "eth0" to "enX0" (using persistent block device naming scheme), https://wiki.debian.org/NewInBuster#Network_interface_name_migration Which version of De

Re: Re: XEN domU: Guest Rx stalled, unreachable

Hi Felix, It looks to me like a change in one of the systemd or udev packages in vm-sid is causing the trouble here. In my experience with Debian, the networking startup stuff is not so straightforward, but I do know that systemd and udev are the software components responsible for setting up the

Re: XEN domU: Guest Rx stalled, unreachable

On 1/16/2022 7:16 AM, Felix Odenkirchen wrote: Dear all, I'm running a stock Debian SID vm on xen, hostname "vm-sid". Dom0 is on stock Debian Bullseye, hostname "bigiron-one". apt updating vm-sid packages on 2022-01-13 08:11:00 UTC rendered vm-sid unaccessible over network upon reboot. Updated

Re: [Xen]: Heads UP: kernel from linux-image-4.9.0-7-amd64 might not boot on Xen

Hi, In article <9e5cd72f3a49245a58b3263d5976f96e.squir...@swampthing.dk>, Torben Schou Jensen wrote: > Yep, I had same problem last night, lucky me I started by upgrading a test > server before production server. > > I just see a workaround have been posted. > This workaround work here

Re: [Xen]: Heads UP: kernel from linux-image-4.9.0-7-amd64 might not boot on Xen

Yep, I had same problem last night, lucky me I started by upgrading a test server before production server. I just see a workaround have been posted. This workaround work here while we wait for a real stable kernel update. Hi, > > if you are running Debian on Xen you should keep your eyes open w

Re: xen bootcamp (was: xen: was Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd) upstream

Hi. On Wed, Oct 01, 2014 at 09:55:47AM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > Xen is a microkernel, and there's two major versions of such > > microkernel > > - 3 and 4. Debian currently uses version 4, about the only one who > > uses version 3 today is Oracle. Xen's microkernel is a free software. > > >

Re: xen bootcamp (was: xen: was Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd) upstream

On Wed, 1 Oct 2014 12:20:31 +0400 Reco wrote: > Hi. Hi Reco, This is outstanding information. Thank you! > > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:16:41PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:57:41 +0400 > > Reco wrote: > > > > > Ok, ok. We all got it already. S*stemd in Debian = bad.

Re: xen bootcamp (was: xen: was Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd) upstream

On Mi, 01 oct 14, 12:20:31, Reco wrote: > > So they say. They also say that NetBSD was the first, and it is the most > portable of BSDs. > But the reality is that BSD people say you 'it runs on this platform' > that usually means they give you so called 'base system' and a > toolchain. And if you

Re: xen bootcamp (was: xen: was Challenge to you: Voice your concerns regarding systemd) upstream

Hi. On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 04:16:41PM -0400, Steve Litt wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 17:57:41 +0400 > Reco wrote: > > > Ok, ok. We all got it already. S*stemd in Debian = bad. S*stemd in > > Fedora = good. Fedora has no xen, hence = bad. Debian has xen, hence = > > good. > > > > Reco > > Rec

Re: XEN 4.0 and Debian 6 HVM Problem.

Hi, I know this thread is a little old, but was wondering if you figured out any solution to this problem? I have successfully run HVMs with the xen 4.1 in the repository for Debian 7 (Wheezy), but was running into stability issues. But as it stands, it still reboots on HVM execution. My h

Re: Xen Domain0 keep rebooting on IBMx346

G'day Alan, On 5/04/2013 5:57 PM, alan04 wrote: > I saw your email > :http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2011/03/msg00504.html, and hope to > learn some infomation from you. > > I have similar problem of IBM x346, with Xen 4.1.2(on Ubuntu 12.04), or > Xen 4.1.3 (on Ubuntu 12.10). > The domain0 a

[SOLVED] Re: [Xen-users] [Pkg-xen-devel] Recent hypervisor update on Debian Wheezy breaks domU networking

On 18 February 2013 16:32, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 13:51 +, Gavin wrote: > > > > > If the kernel hasn't changed and you are 100% sure the network > configuration before and after the reboot is the same then so am I. > > All I can suggest is to reinstall the previous versi

Re: [Xen-users] [Pkg-xen-devel] Recent hypervisor update on Debian Wheezy breaks domU networking

On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 13:51 +, Gavin wrote: > I managed to get iDRAC console access and on further inspection it > appears that grub first boots xen-4.1-amd64.gz and then the Linux > kernel. Correct. > When I updated the Xen Hypervisor does it not also upgrade the > xen-4.1-amd64.gz file ??

Re: xen on wheezy

- Original Message - > From: "cr...@gtek.biz" > To: Patrick Bartek > Cc: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" > Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 7:11 AM > Subject: Re: xen on wheezy > > On Thursday, December 27, 2012 19:55, "Patrick Bart

Re: xen on wheezy

On Thursday, December 27, 2012 19:55, "Patrick Bartek" said: >>> I would restart at the beginning: >>> >>>    http://www.xen.org/support/documentation.html >>> >>>    http://wiki.debian.org/Xen> >> >> Well I've been through those, and several other pages. The only real >> difference is I'm us

Re: xen on wheezy

- Original Message - > From: "cr...@gtek.biz" > To: Patrick Bartek > Cc: "debian-user@lists.debian.org" > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 3:54 PM > Subject: Re: xen on wheezy > > On Thursday, December 27, 2012 17:14, "Patrick B

Re: xen on wheezy

On Thursday, December 27, 2012 17:14, "Patrick Bartek" said: >> Any pointers would be appreciated. > > > I would restart at the beginning: > >    http://www.xen.org/support/documentation.html > >    http://wiki.debian.org/Xen> Well I've been through those, and several other pages. The only

Re: xen on wheezy

- Original Message - > From: "cr...@gtek.biz" > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Cc: > Sent: Thursday, December 27, 2012 10:33 AM > Subject: xen on wheezy > > I am trying to learn virtualization with Xen on Wheezy. I have installed > Wheezy > on an old AMD Athlon XP system, and

Re: Xen vs. KVM on Debian squeeze

Hello, I'm using xen on my system too I have an CPU like yours. In the system are 8GB Ram There are three domU everyone with an own ip adress (bridging) I have one domU with 512mb the other ones are with 1024mb ram. the dom0 is running on wheezy. There are no problems at the moment. The domU is

Re: Xen vs. KVM on Debian squeeze

Am 09.12.2012 um 07:48 schrieb P. J. McDermott: I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests. I'm trying to decide between Xen 4.0 (with paravirtualized guests and probably the xend/xm toolstack) and qemu-kvm

Re: Xen vs. KVM on Debian squeeze

Peter Viskup wrote: > Consider LXC [2] in case you have some concerns of CPU/memory overhead > and you plan to run only Linux virtual servers. LXC looks really nice but you need very up-to-date packages, and possibly may even need to consider compiling from source. Issues I've hit so far (none

Re: Xen vs. KVM on Debian squeeze

P. J. McDermott wrote: > I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server So now you have recommendations both ways :-) Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.

Re: Xen vs. KVM on Debian squeeze

On 12/09/2012 07:48 AM, P. J. McDermott wrote: Hi, I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests. I'm trying to decide between Xen 4.0 (with paravirtualized guests and probably the xend/xm toolstack) and qemu-kv

Re: Xen vs. KVM on Debian squeeze

Greetings, On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Chris Davies wrote: > P. J. McDermott wrote: >> I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian >> GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests. > > I'd recommend KVM and libvirt/VMM. I'd go for Xen. Not a virtual

Re: Xen vs. KVM on Debian squeeze

P. J. McDermott wrote: > I'd like to set up virtualization on a home server with a Debian > GNU/Linux squeeze amd64 host and squeeze and wheezy amd64 guests. I'd recommend KVM and libvirt/VMM. > The server has two 3.0-GHz CPU cores (an AMD CPU with the AMD-V/SVM > virtualization extensions) and

Re: Xen vs KVM

i am using proxmox KVM.. on 3 base servers for more then 2 years. i do migrate, backup and all the process intensive task and every thing. till today i havent found any issue related to stabitliy. once i remeber i havent started my virtual machines for 4 monts,and my base, i never found a reason to

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Tom H wrote: > Unless there's a fedora-devel thread where this was discussed, there's > probably no way to know why RHEL6 switched to kvm except to assume > that kvm's in-kernel and xen isn't. This has changed in the latest > kernels so xen support might very well

Re: xen hypervisor security update.

> Mauro writes: > In debian squeeze there are several xen security updates: > xen-hypervisor xen-utils and so on. > In the debian website there are no information on what are the fixes. ? http://debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2501 > Where can I find them? Apart from c

Re: xen hypervisor security update.

04.07.2012 09:20, Mauro: > In the debian website there are no information on what are the fixes. The information is there. > Where can I find them? http://www.debian.org/security/2012/dsa-2501 -- Regards mks -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subje

Re: Xen memory management not working

On 04/23/2012 03:01 AM, Bob Proulx wrote: You didn't say... Have you rebooted your VM since then? Bob Hi Bob, yes I did and the behavior didn't changed. -- Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@list

Re: Xen memory management not working

Peter Viskup wrote: > The target_kb value changed on VPS, but the available memory didn't > increased for some unknown reason: You didn't say... Have you rebooted your VM since then? Bob signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Friday 30 March 2012 18:09:44 Tony van der Hoff wrote: > For heaven's sake, it is perfectly evident that this guy (Zhang Enming) > is setting up as a troll. Admittedly, he's doing it quite well, but > let's stop responding to his ranting, and he'll get bored. I came to that same conclusion, but

Re: Xen vs KVM

> Do you know when RHEL 7 might be released? If you had asked that a couple of months ago, I would have said late 2013 since, in the past, a new release came just before support ended on the version two versions prior to it.  In this case, RHEL 5, whose support ends in early 2014.  But Red Ha

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 30/03/12 12:54, Jon Dowland wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:27:34PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: I beg to differ. Xen virtualization offers superior performance. I say one thing, you say another. Neither of us are providing any evidence to the discussion (thus far) apart from

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 00:13:40 -0700, Hilco wrote in message : > RH employs some of the KVM devs. RH apparently has not contributed to > Xen for several years and has now decided to only support a single > code base: KVM. It does not appear to have anything to do with Xen or > its quality/performan

Re: Xen vs KVM

Am Donnerstag, 29. März 2012 schrieb francis picabia: > Xen requires a patched kernel. It is unstable. It crashed on > me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff. > The system which experienced this returned to a standard > Debian kernel and never had a problem again. Not any lo

Re: Xen vs KVM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Proxmox VE seems to be it's own distribution and I don't understand which should be run first with Ganeti :). On 30.03.2012 15:42, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: >> I just got interested about vi

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 02:36:32PM +0300, Mika Suomalainen wrote: > I just got interested about virtualization and noticed that this > thread is still going on. > > As far as I can see, most people are currently recommending Xen. The sample size of thread participants is too small to extrapolate

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 3:13 AM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > On 29 March 2012 22:59, Tom H wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabia wrote: >>> >>> Xen requires a patched kernel.  It is unstable.  It crashed on >>> me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff. >>> Th

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:27:14PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: >> >> Do you know when RHEL 7 might be released? > > Take a look at when RHEL 6 came out (very recently) and how long the gap > between RHEL releases is on average (lar

Re: Xen vs KVM

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just got interested about virtualization and noticed that this thread is still going on. As far as I can see, most people are currently recommending Xen. Are there any GUIs or WebUIs for Xen or KVM and how do they work? - -- Mika Suomalainen

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 01:27:34PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: > I beg to differ. Xen virtualization offers superior performance. I say one thing, you say another. Neither of us are providing any evidence to the discussion (thus far) apart from my anecdotal evidence, where I get more

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 05:27:14PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: > Do you know when RHEL 7 might be released? Take a look at when RHEL 6 came out (very recently) and how long the gap between RHEL releases is on average (large) and extrapolate (not for years). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Vi, 30 mar 12, 17:24:55, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: [snipped 38 lines] > May I know what is Proxmox? http://lmgtfy.com/?q=proxmox Kind regards, Andrei -- Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic sig

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 30/03/2012 13:59, Tom H wrote: On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabia wrote: Xen requires a patched kernel. It is unstable. It crashed on me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff. The system which experienced this returned to a standard Debian kernel and never

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 30/03/2012 13:34, wlan wrote: On my job we using KVM+Proxmox, This is pretty. 2012/3/30 Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) > On 28/03/2012 16:36, Jon Dowland wrote: On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: I am also in favor of

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 30/03/2012 00:32, francis picabia wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponce wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that the hypervisor m

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 29/03/2012 00:44, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponce wrote: On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that the hypervisor model (putting an entirely new kernel between Linux and the

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 29 March 2012 22:59, Tom H wrote: > On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabia wrote: >> >> Xen requires a patched kernel.  It is unstable.  It crashed on >> me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff. >> The system which experienced this returned to a standard >> Debia

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:32 PM, francis picabia wrote: > > Xen requires a patched kernel.  It is unstable.  It crashed on > me randomly before I got as far as configuring any VM stuff. > The system which experienced this returned to a standard > Debian kernel and never had a problem again. > > K

Re: Xen vs KVM

On my job we using KVM+Proxmox, This is pretty. 2012/3/30 Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) > On 28/03/2012 16:36, Jon Dowland wrote: > >> On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: >> >>> I am also in favor of Xen. >>> >> >> You have just said, not two messages ago, that you've never even tr

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 28/03/2012 16:36, Jon Dowland wrote: On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: I am also in favor of Xen. You have just said, not two messages ago, that you've never even tried KVM. I always prefer to base my opinions on evidence, personally. Yes, I have never tried Linux

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 28/03/2012 16:35, Jon Dowland wrote: On 27/03/12 14:32, Aaron Toponce wrote: IMO, Xen isn't "yesterday's virtualization technology". It's very current, stable, flexible, supported and very much "today's virtualization technology". For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became appa

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote: > On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponce wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: >>> For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that >>> the hypervisor model (putting an entirely new kernel

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 28 March 2012 06:43, Aaron Toponce wrote: > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: >> For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that >> the hypervisor model (putting an entirely new kernel between Linux and >> the hardware) created all sorts of perfo

Re: Xen vs KVM

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:35:25AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that > the hypervisor model (putting an entirely new kernel between Linux and > the hardware) created all sorts of performance problems, and neglected > the decades of wor

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 28/03/12 01:32, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: I am also in favor of Xen. You have just said, not two messages ago, that you've never even tried KVM. I always prefer to base my opinions on evidence, personally. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 27/03/12 14:32, Aaron Toponce wrote: IMO, Xen isn't "yesterday's virtualization technology". It's very current, stable, flexible, supported and very much "today's virtualization technology". For me, it became yesterday's technology when it became apparent that the hypervisor model (putting a

Re: Xen vs KVM

supported. The specific needs of the usecase should lead you to the choice to be made! Best regards! > Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:55:31 +0800 > From: ubuntu.fan.2...@gmail.com > To: aaron.topo...@gmail.com; debian-user@lists.debian.org; singapore.mr.teo.en.m...@gmail.com > S

Re: Xen and Squeeze

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Tom H wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU >>  wrote: >>> On Ma, 27 mar 12, 18:53:20, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: Only Linux 3.0 has Xen dom0 and domU support. Unless Linux kernel 2.6 in Debian 6.0 sque

RE: Xen vs KVM

1:55:31 +0800 > From: ubuntu.fan.2...@gmail.com > To: aaron.topo...@gmail.com; debian-user@lists.debian.org; > singapore.mr.teo.en.m...@gmail.com > Subject: Re: Xen vs KVM > > On 27/03/2012 21:32, Aaron Toponce wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Jon Dowlan

Re: Xen and Squeeze

On 27/03/2012 23:06, Miles Fidelman wrote: Tom H wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 27 mar 12, 18:53:20, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: Only Linux 3.0 has Xen dom0 and domU support. Unless Linux kernel 2.6 in Debian 6.0 squeeze has special Xen dom0 patche

Re: Xen and Squeeze

On 27/03/2012 22:19, Tom H wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 27 mar 12, 18:53:20, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: Only Linux 3.0 has Xen dom0 and domU support. Unless Linux kernel 2.6 in Debian 6.0 squeeze has special Xen dom0 patches. You can have 3.2 on

Re: Xen vs KVM

On 27/03/2012 21:32, Aaron Toponce wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 09:51:28AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:04:57PM +0800, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: When will Debian 7.0 be released? Debian with Linux Kernel 3.x release seems very slow when all the other Linux dist

Re: Xen and Squeeze

Tom H wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 27 mar 12, 18:53:20, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: Only Linux 3.0 has Xen dom0 and domU support. Unless Linux kernel 2.6 in Debian 6.0 squeeze has special Xen dom0 patches. You can have 3.2 on squeeze from squeeze

Re: Xen and Squeeze (was: When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?)

On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote: > On Ma, 27 mar 12, 18:53:20, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: >> >> Only Linux 3.0 has Xen dom0 and domU support. Unless Linux kernel >> 2.6 in Debian 6.0 squeeze has special Xen dom0 patches. > > You can have 3.2 on squeeze from squeeze-bac

Re: Xen and Squeeze (was: When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?)

On 27/03/2012 20:04, Andrei POPESCU wrote: On Ma, 27 mar 12, 18:53:20, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: Only Linux 3.0 has Xen dom0 and domU support. Unless Linux kernel 2.6 in Debian 6.0 squeeze has special Xen dom0 patches. You can have 3.2 on squeeze from squeeze-backports. Not sure if it h

Re: Xen and Squeeze (was: When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?)

On Ma, 27 mar 12, 18:53:20, Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) wrote: > > Only Linux 3.0 has Xen dom0 and domU support. Unless Linux kernel > 2.6 in Debian 6.0 squeeze has special Xen dom0 patches. You can have 3.2 on squeeze from squeeze-backports. Not sure if it has the Xen bits though. Kind regards,

Re: Xen and Squeeze (was: When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?)

On 27/03/2012 15:17, didier gaumet wrote: Le Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:04:57 +0800, "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" a écrit : [...] Why do I want Linux Kernel 3.x? Because I want to play around with Xen virtualization (dom0 required). [...] Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think you need another kernel

Re: Xen and Squeeze (was: When will Debian 7.0 with Linux Kernel 3.x be Released?)

Le Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:04:57 +0800, "Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming)" a écrit : [...] > Why do I want Linux Kernel 3.x? Because > I want to play around with Xen virtualization (dom0 required). [...] Maybe I am wrong, but I don't think you need another kernel than the squeeze stock kernel. Take a look

Re: XEN 4.0 and Debian 6 HVM Problem.

With Debian Wheezy it works flawlessly. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f023625.5050...@gmail.com

Re: [Xen-users] debian squeeze, xen and a very big problem.

"You need to run your own test servers if you want a working update since we don't test stuff like live migration (that is most basic functionality)" makes me chuckle a bit. 2 test servers can buy helluvah support contract, where the issues would probably be addressed quickly. Shouldn't it be that

Re: [Xen-users] debian squeeze, xen and a very big problem.

Mauro wrote: I can't believe that a serious distribution like debian do not do tests before suggest an upgrade. As Scott says, for production systems you either have to test things yourself, or you accept that possibly an upgrade may break your system. Debian (and the other distributions) do

Re: [Xen-users] debian squeeze, xen and a very big problem.

On 13 October 2011 21:56, Scott Damron wrote: > While I understand your position, you should have tested very > thoroughly before deploying any upgrades to a production system. > Screeching about Debian being bad is not going to garner you any > sympathy if you didn't test your patches in a lab or

Re: [Xen-users] debian squeeze, xen and a very big problem.

While I understand your position, you should have tested very thoroughly before deploying any upgrades to a production system. Screeching about Debian being bad is not going to garner you any sympathy if you didn't test your patches in a lab or QA environment before upgrading your system. That is

RE: Xen-hypervisor doesn't boot

> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 14:34:30 +0300 wrote: > > Hello, > > Xen hypervisor doesn't boot after upgrade following packages: > > linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.32-32 > linux-libc-dev 2.6.32-32 > linux-base 2.6.32-32 > > But boots ok after downgrade to: > > linux-image-2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 2.6.3

Re: Xen support

On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 11:43:06AM +0500, tahir ali wrote: > Hi > > i installed xen on debain 6.0 squeeze using "apt-get" but it is not booting. > can u plz let me know how to start with Xen on debain 6.0 sqeeze. You are looking for http://wiki.debian.org/Xen Please note that the grub2 scripts d

Re: Xen support

Hi, tahir ali wrote: i installed xen on debain 6.0 squeeze using "apt-get" but it is not booting. can u plz let me know how to start with Xen on debain 6.0 sqeeze. If you got what I got, then the server will reboot every time ... my fix was to increase the grub timeout from 5 seconds to 10 se

Re: Xen support

tahir ali put forth on 3/16/2011 1:43 AM: > Hi > > i installed xen on debain 6.0 squeeze using "apt-get" but it is not booting. > can u plz let me know how to start with Xen on debain 6.0 sqeeze. You need to provide much more detail. Saying " installed xen" is much to vague when talking about pa

RE: xen hypervisor on sid, no xen kernel

> On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 13:39:34 -0600 wrote: > > Hi, > > In looking at Xen I see that the hypervisor is on Sid but no Xen kernel. > Anyone venture a guess as to why? > Just a guess, perhaps the 2.6.38 pv-ops kernel is in the works :) -M -- To UNSUBSCRI

Re: Xen questions

Andrew McGlashan wrote: My first DomU machine is 1 hour slower than my Dom0 machine, how should I properly synchronize the times? There's a good discussion of clock synchronization on the debian wiki, at: http://wiki.debian.org/Xen#A.27clocksource.2BAC8-0.3ATimewentbackwards.27 FYI: I set up a

Re: Xen questions

Hi, Abhishek Dixit wrote: On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Andrew McGlashan wrote: Hi, I'm on a crash course with Xen got some quick questions. Which course :) Well, my own, self-learning. ;-) Hardware is Dual 3GHz EM64T CPUs on an IBM x346 machine. Using Squeeze amd64 installat

Re: Xen questions

On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 8:49 PM, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Hi, > > I'm on a crash course with Xen got some quick questions. Which course :) > Hardware is Dual 3GHz EM64T CPUs on an IBM x346 machine. > > Using Squeeze amd64 installation with lvm2, all good so far.  Using 6 disks > with the Serv

Re: Xen on Squeeze won't start

On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 22:51, Rippl, Steve wrote: > Well just in case someone else hits this... once my colleague > suggested I look closer at what grub2 was doing, and after more time > on Google and experimenting I came up with this... the actual xen 3.4 > hypervisor isn't being put into the gru

RE: Xen on Squeeze won't start

> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2010 13:51:14 -0700 > Subject: Re: Xen on Squeeze won't start > From: rip...@woodlandschools.org > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > CC: wa...@debian.org > > Well just in case someone else hits this... once my colleague > suggested I look closer

Re: Xen on Squeeze won't start

Well just in case someone else hits this... once my colleague suggested I look closer at what grub2 was doing, and after more time on Google and experimenting I came up with this... the actual xen 3.4 hypervisor isn't being put into the grub2 boot list. It's not good booting off the one that says

Re: xen

IAN DELANEY wrote: Hello there, Ny name is Ian, from Perth Australia. I have a question to be answered please. I'm a linux user, so I use suse, debian, ubuntu and gentoo, and fedora. I'm interested in exploring the capabilities of xen and have done so an all the above. I'm in a brand new ins

Re: xen

On Friday 16 April 2010 22:53:48 Mike Viau wrote: > Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:55:32 +0800 wrote: > Hello there, Ny name is Ian, from Perth Australia. > I have a question to be answered please. I'm a linux user, so I use suse, > debian, ubuntu and gentoo, and fedora.I'm interested in exploring the > c

RE: xen

Sat, 17 Apr 2010 01:55:32 +0800 wrote: Hello there, Ny name is Ian, from Perth Australia. I have a question to be answered please. I'm a linux user, so I use suse, debian, ubuntu and gentoo, and fedora.I'm interested in exploring the capabilities of xen and have done so an all the abo

RE: [Xen-users] Compilation error

ne/stdlib.h Please advise further, thanks. -M Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 22:07:36 +0100 From: michael.schm...@xncore.com To: xen-us...@lists.xensource.com Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Compilation error CC: mike.v...@sheridanc.on.ca In file included from crc32.c:29: zutil.h:23:22:

Re: [Xen-users] Slow network speed with Xen 3.2-1

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 12:19:57PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:46:53PM -0400, Brent Verner wrote: > > I had a similar problem and the solution was to disable checksum > > offloading in the domU. > > > > sh# ethtool -K eth0 tx off > > > > You can add this to your /et

Re: [Xen-users] Slow network speed with Xen 3.2-1

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:46:53PM -0400, Brent Verner wrote: > I had a similar problem and the solution was to disable checksum > offloading in the domU. > > sh# ethtool -K eth0 tx off > > You can add this to your /etc/network/interfaces, too.. > > post-up ethtool -K eth0 tx off > > > I al

Re: [Xen-users] Slow network speed with Xen 3.2-1

On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Brent Verner wrote: > I had a similar problem and the solution was to disable checksum > offloading in the domU. > > sh# ethtool -K eth0 tx off i tried this before but it didn't work. :( Any other idea? Regards, Alejandro. > You can add this to your /etc/networ

Re: [Xen-users] Slow network speed with Xen 3.2-1

I had a similar problem and the solution was to disable checksum offloading in the domU. sh# ethtool -K eth0 tx off You can add this to your /etc/network/interfaces, too.. post-up ethtool -K eth0 tx off I also had to disable this in my dom0 for dhcp to work... cheers! b On Thu, Sep 10,

Re: xen pci passthrough 2.6.26.2

On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 08:10:33AM +0200, Marc Schröder wrote: > Am Montag 17 August 2009 18:39:22 schrieb Andrew Sackville-West: > > > > looks like it's working, but obviously not. Have you seen this: > > > > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Assign_hardware_to_DomU_with_PCIBack_as_m > >odule > no

Re: xen pci passthrough 2.6.26.2

Am Montag 17 August 2009 18:39:22 schrieb Andrew Sackville-West: > > looks like it's working, but obviously not. Have you seen this: > > http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/Assign_hardware_to_DomU_with_PCIBack_as_m >odule no, i dont. but this describe how i use pciback if this is build as a module.

Re: xen pci passthrough 2.6.26.2

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:34:23AM +0200, Marc Schröder wrote: > hi, > > i cant hide pci devices in dom0. i boot my dom0 simply with > pciback.hide=(00:11.5), but this device is allways visible. also i cant > passtrough this to domU - no errors but invisible in domU. > > in this case the 00:11.

  1   2   3   >