Re: unzip files bigger than 4 GB

2023-06-14 Thread Mike Castle
Nvm, confused 2G with 4G. Sorry for the noise. On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 12:21 PM Mike Castle wrote: > > It seems like it should. I haven't upgraded my system yet: > > $ unzip -v | grep -e 6 -e LARGE > UnZip 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Debian. Original by Info-ZIP. > USE_DEFLATE64 (PKZIP 4.

Re: unzip files bigger than 4 GB

2023-06-14 Thread Mike Castle
It seems like it should. I haven't upgraded my system yet: $ unzip -v | grep -e 6 -e LARGE UnZip 6.00 of 20 April 2009, by Debian. Original by Info-ZIP. USE_DEFLATE64 (PKZIP 4.x Deflate64(tm) supported) LARGE_FILE_SUPPORT (large files over 2 GiB supported) ZIP64_SUPPORT (a

Re: unzip files bigger than 4 GB

2023-06-14 Thread Alexander V. Makartsev
On 14.06.2023 23:19, Van Snyder wrote: unzip v 6.0 (the version delivered with Debian 10) doesn't work with files bigger than 2^32 bytes. Is there an alternative program to do it? "7zip" is the best. It supports multiple formats and cross-platform. -- With kindest regards, Alexander. ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶

Re: unzip -a strange behavior

2009-02-17 Thread Dennis Wicks
Ron Johnson wrote the following on 02/16/2009 07:05 PM: On 02/16/2009 06:50 PM, Dennis Wicks wrote: dgwicks:~# unzip -v UnZip 5.52 of 28 February 2005, by Debian. Original by Info-ZIP. It doesn't look like it has changed in the past five years, which makes me think it might be something else

Re: unzip -a strange behavior

2009-02-16 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/16/2009 06:50 PM, Dennis Wicks wrote: dgwicks:~# unzip -v UnZip 5.52 of 28 February 2005, by Debian. Original by Info-ZIP. It doesn't look like it has changed in the past five years, which makes me think it might be something else that unzip interacts with. But I have no idea what it mi

Re: unzip -a strange behavior

2009-02-16 Thread Dennis Wicks
dgwicks:~# unzip -v UnZip 5.52 of 28 February 2005, by Debian. Original by Info-ZIP. It doesn't look like it has changed in the past five years, which makes me think it might be something else that unzip interacts with. But I have no idea what it might be. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian

Re: unzip -a strange behavior

2009-02-16 Thread Ron Johnson
On 02/16/2009 11:31 AM, Dennis Wicks wrote: Greetings; I regularly use the -a option to unzip to fix DOS/Windows line endings and have never had a problem. Until yesterday and today! Today it treated everything as a binary file and all the text/ascii files still had ^M at the end of each lin

Re: unzip from sid requires libc5

2002-06-28 Thread Wayne Topa
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > > > Right. ldd /usr/bin/unzip shows libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001b000) > > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) > > > > It is something screwed up with 'my' account! > > > > It gives this

Re: unzip from sid requires libc5

2002-06-28 Thread Alan Shutko
Wayne Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It is something screwed up with 'my' account! "type unzip" will tell you what unzip you're running. -- Alan Shutko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - In a variety of flavors! The debate rages on: Is PL/I Bachtrian or Dromedary? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P

Re: unzip from sid requires libc5

2002-06-28 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > Right. ldd /usr/bin/unzip shows libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x4001b000) > /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4000) > > It is something screwed up with 'my' account! > > It gives this error "unzip: can't load library 'libc.so.5'" when run > as me but works fin

Re: unzip from sid requires libc5

2002-06-28 Thread Wayne Topa
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said: > > On 28-Jun-2002 Wayne Topa wrote: > > > > I ran deborphan last week and removed libc5, among others. I > > received a zip file today and found that unzip 5.50-1 from unstable > > requires libc5 but apt-cache show unzip does not

RE: unzip from sid requires libc5

2002-06-28 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
On 28-Jun-2002 Wayne Topa wrote: > > I ran deborphan last week and removed libc5, among others. I > received a zip file today and found that unzip 5.50-1 from unstable > requires libc5 but apt-cache show unzip does not have it listed as a > requirement. > > Seems odd that a program in unstable

Re: unzip - gnucash - openoffice

2001-12-20 Thread dman
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:40:19PM +0100, Fran?ois Chenais wrote: | I'm using a Woody debian and want to install unzip, gnucash | and openoffice. My apt-cache doesn't find any of them. gnucash has some dependency problems which got it kicked out of woody. It is in sid, though, and I use it a lot.

Re: unzip - gnucash - openoffice

2001-12-20 Thread Johann Spies
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:40:19PM +0100, Fran?ois Chenais wrote: > > I'm using a Woody debian and want to install unzip, gnucash > and openoffice. My apt-cache doesn't find any of them. Maybe apt-get update will help in the case of gnucash. Wait, no - there is a problem: $ sudo apt-

Re: Unzip in Debian 2.2r3 ??

2001-07-04 Thread Guy Geens
> "infernal" == infernal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: infernal> I coudn't find the Unzip utility in my "potato".. but the infernal> zip. where in debian.org can I find it ? I can't Unzip and zip are packaged separately for historical reasons. You can find them in the non-US section of th

Re: Unzip in Debian 2.2r3 ??

2001-07-03 Thread ktb
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 08:27:08PM -0400, Infernal wrote: > I coudn't find the Unzip utility in my "potato".. but the zip. > > where in debian.org can I find it ? I can't You can search for packages and files at - http://www.debian.org/distrib/packages $ apt-cache search unzip might net you

Re: unzip

2000-12-01 Thread Seung-woo Nam
Hi: apt-get install unzip Seung-woo Nam - Original Message - From: "Alistair Whittle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2000 8:36 AM Subject: unzip > Hi, > > I have just installed debian GNU/Linux 2.2. The install worked fine, and I > am now trying to install anoth

Re: Why non-free (was Re: unzip - again)

2000-12-01 Thread Santiago Vila
unzip license changed from potato to woody. That's why it is in non-free in potato and in non-US/main in woody. BTW: The version in woody (for i386) supports encryption and works ok under potato because it was compiled under potato (i.e. no need to use glibc-2.2).

Re: unzip

2000-12-01 Thread John Bagdanoff
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 01:36:02PM -, Alistair Whittle wrote: > Hi, > > I have just installed debian GNU/Linux 2.2. The install worked fine, and I > am now trying to install another application which requires a file to be > unzipped. The unzip command for some reason does not register. Lo

Re: Why non-free (was Re: unzip - again)

2000-11-30 Thread Jimmy O'Regan
On Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Chris Gray wrote: > I knew I had seen a better copyright somewhere: > > -- > Latest Release > > New features in UnZip 5.41, released 16 April 2000: > > > new BSD-like license > Yeah, that's why zip is in main. Unzip, however, st

Re: Why non-free (was Re: unzip - again)

2000-11-30 Thread Chris Gray
> "kmself" == kmself writes: kmself> on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 04:52:51PM -0500, Chris Gray kmself> ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > "Carel" == Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Carel> unzip is not truly free, so it ain't part of Debian pure. Carel> Try

Why non-free (was Re: unzip - again)

2000-11-30 Thread kmself
on Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 04:52:51PM -0500, Chris Gray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > "Carel" == Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Carel> unzip is not truly free, so it ain't part of Debian pure. > Carel> Try adding non-free to your default deb line in your > Carel> /et

Re: unzip - again

2000-11-30 Thread Chris Gray
> "Carel" == Carel Fellinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Carel> unzip is not truly free, so it ain't part of Debian pure. Carel> Try adding non-free to your default deb line in your Carel> /etc/apt/sources.list: This is strange to me. I've seen the unzip licence, and it looks lik

Re: unzip - again

2000-11-30 Thread Carel Fellinger
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:28:51PM -, Alistair Whittle wrote: > Hi, > > Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package. > However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package > unzip has no available version, but exists in the database. This

Re: unzip - again

2000-11-30 Thread Colin Watson
Chewie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:28:51PM -, Alistair Whittle wrote: >> Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package. >> However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package >> unzip has no available version, but ex

Re: unzip - again

2000-11-30 Thread Chewie
On Thu, Nov 30, 2000 at 02:28:51PM -, Alistair Whittle wrote: > Hi, > > Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package. > However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package > unzip has no available version, but exists in the database. This

Re: unzip - again

2000-11-30 Thread Robert Guthrie
On Thursday 30 November 2000 08:28, Alistair Whittle wrote: > Hi, > > Using 'apt-get install zip' worked like a charm to install the zip package. > However, using the 'unzip' variant, the following error occurred: "Package > unzip has no available version, but exists in the database. This > typic

Re: unzip

2000-11-30 Thread Sebastiaan
Hi, you can install unzip (and almost every other application you might need) with: # apt-get install unzip Under Linux it is more common to use 'tarballs' or bzip2. Tar is standardly installed and you could use it the following way: $ tar -cvzf homedir.tar.gz /home/myself this (c)reates a new fi

RE: unzip

2000-11-30 Thread Steeve Lennmark
apt-get install unzip // Steeve. > -Original Message- > From: Alistair Whittle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: den 30 november 2000 14:37 > To: 'debian-user@lists.debian.org' > Subject: unzip > > > Hi, > > I have just installed debian GNU/Linux 2.2. The install > worked fine, and I

Re: unzip not installed?

2000-09-28 Thread David Wright
Quoting Willy Lee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > So 'zip' works, but strangely enough, unzip doesn't seem to have been > installed. What's going on? Do I need to install another package to > get unzip? Unlike gzip, there doesn't seem to be a command-line > option to cause zip to unzip. Yes, you need u

Re: unzip not installed?

2000-09-28 Thread Colin Watson
Willy Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg --status zip >Package: zip >Status: install ok installed [...] >So 'zip' works, but strangely enough, unzip doesn't seem to have been >installed. What's going on? Do I need to install another package to >get unzip? Yes - install the

Re: unzip

1999-05-15 Thread David B.Teague
On Sat, 15 May 1999, Shao Zhang wrote: > Is there a version of unzip which supports encryption? Shao You should find zip-crypt and unzip-crypt in non-US. On my system, I find: $/var/local/debian/debian-non-US/dists/slink/non-US/binary-i386[1]$ls*zip* bzip_0.21-3.1.debunzip-crypt_5.3