On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 21:37:04 -0600,
Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> paul valley wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > I will be leaving M$ :-[ behind soon and installing debian :-) :-)
> > :-) however theres a problem i need to address on two fronts First
> > i have
Kent West wrote:
> edit "/etc/modules" and add the single line:
> tulip
>
> Reboot (not strictly necessary, but easy to do to accomplish what needs
> to be done).
Since you are adding new hardware it is okay to reboot. :-) But
alternatively just load the module.
modprobe tulip
Yet anothe
paul valley wrote:
Hi all:
I will be leaving M$ :-[ behind soon and installing debian :-) :-) :-)
however theres a problem i need to address on two fronts First i have
fjound that i have a linksys pci nic which means i have the tulip driver
:-( A how can i install this with minimal fuss becau
hey, just another idea for ya, have you tried using the bf24 series
boot floppies? they're based on a different kernel alltogether.
sean
msg18559/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Yea, ive always used the 2.2x kernel series during
installation, and everytime it probbed my card for
dhcp it went through just fine, and with woody it
doesnt. And i typically just halt at that moment,
since i prefer to install the distro from online,
instead of installing from cd then upgrading t
dudahhh said:
> Secondly, when i ran potato, i always updated the
> kernel to 2.4.18, and ive never had any problems.
>
> So, ive determined theres just something wrong with
> that tulip driver with woody, i do see there is an
> updated one at ftp://ftp.scyld.com/pub/network/tulip.c
>
> So now my
Jule Slootbeek wrote:
now my question is: how do i set this IRQ parameter since i
know for a
fact it is 12 on my system
> On Thursday, May 30, 2002, at 02:41 AM, Jan Johansson wrote:
You never pass IRQ to a tulip board (you should never ened to pass IRQ
to a PCI board at all). Something el
Ok, so i'm not sure what to do, it gave the same error when i was
installing the modules during set-up..(i'm trying Sid on a second box)
and w/out a network card i'm kinda limited to what to do)
So i might have to recompile the kernel w/ tulip support, but the
tulip.o file is in the /lib/modules
> now my question is: how do i set this IRQ parameter since i
> know for a
> fact it is 12 on my system
You never pass IRQ to a tulip board (you should never ened to pass IRQ to a PCI
board at all). Something else must be wrong.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
kage?
From: dman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: tulip driver woes
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:21:54 -0600
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:04:06PM -0800, Kapil Khosla wrote:
| Hi,
| I have a DEC 21145 which uses a tulip driver, I do install via the
| net and a
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 10:04:06PM -0800, Kapil Khosla wrote:
| Hi,
| I have a DEC 21145 which uses a tulip driver, I do install via the
| net and am having problems with the driver/card.
|
| When I configure the driver modules, it says INSTALLATION SUCCEEDED
| , but when I configure the network,
It would appear that the conflict has
not been resolved in Woody either. I
suppose I have two choices:
1. Get down and dirty, and spend lots
of time compiling this crapping tulip
driver myself
2. Install RedHat
I really hate both choices :-(
(==timothy==)
=
On Thu, Mar 07, 2002 at 11:58:57PM -0500, timothy bauscher wrote:
> 2.2r5 Potato Installation:
>
> After configuring PCMCIA support and seeing
> the lights activate on my Netgear FA511 card,
> I tried to install the Tulip module via the
> "net modules" screen. These are the errors
> which I receiv
net>Subject: Re: Tulip chip Netgear
card
11/14/01
12
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a pair of Netgear FX-310TX NICs. (I'm uncertain of the precise model
> card running the PNIC chip (marked LC82C169), which is a Tulip compatible.
> installation isn't. This is undoubtedly a silly thing. What am I doing
> wrong?
The CMOS s
Arne Flones wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm fairly new to Debian, but not new to Linux. In particular, I know about
> configuring almost everything, but not much about the Debian way of doing
> things.
>
The "Debian way.." shouldn't be too much of a factor here. Hardware
support is mainly a function of
Robert Waldner wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:37:22 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >These are *not* new NICs, I've had them for a few years now. I am nearly
> >certain that they are 310s. As I said, both will run on SuSE 6.3 using the
> >standard tulip.c driver. I just need to know what to do
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001 18:37:22 PST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>These are *not* new NICs, I've had them for a few years now. I am nearly
>certain that they are 310s. As I said, both will run on SuSE 6.3 using the
>standard tulip.c driver. I just need to know what to do to get them to work
>with Deb
Tom Allison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > I'm fairly new to Debian, but not new to Linux. In particular, I
> > know about
> > configuring almost everything, but not much about the Debian way of doing
> > things.
> > I have a pair of Netgear FX-310TX NICs. (
On Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 06:37:22PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> These are *not* new NICs, I've had them for a few years now. I am nearly
> certain that they are 310s. As I said, both will run on SuSE 6.3 using the
> standard tulip.c driver. I just need to know what to do to get them to work
Apparently, on Tue, Nov 13, 2001 at 06:37:22PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> These are *not* new NICs, I've had them for a few years now. I am nearly
> certain that they are 310s. As I said, both will run on SuSE 6.3 using the
> standard tulip.c driver. I just need to know what to do to get t
These are *not* new NICs, I've had them for a few years now. I am nearly
certain that they are 310s. As I said, both will run on SuSE 6.3 using the
standard tulip.c driver. I just need to know what to do to get them to work
with Debian 2.2Rev4 Potato.
They are already working fine with the 2.2.1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm fairly new to Debian, but not new to Linux. In particular, I know about
configuring almost everything, but not much about the Debian way of doing
things.
I have a pair of Netgear FX-310TX NICs. (I'm uncertain of the precise model
number; neither card has a mod
I checked again this morning and I have a Accton
EN2242 NIC card.. So I asume that I still use the
tulip.o driver.
Thanks for the response.
Don
--- David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just in case my former got lost in the sauce, if you
> have a
> netgear card, your driver is prob
Just in case my former got lost in the sauce, if you have a
netgear card, your driver is probably ng_tulip rather than
tulip.
Information is not knowledge. Belief is not truth.
Indoctrination is not teaching. Tradition is not
Guess what? If you have a netgear card, you probably want a ng_tulip
driver instead of a tulip driver. I just found this out when I compiled
a new kernel. Don't be mad, I didn't know either. :-)
--
||/ Peace, understanding, health and happiness to all beings! ||
|-K ars sine scientia nihil
Well in response to Does mine work the answer is No.
I have tried for a few days to get this going and
finally figured out that I did not have a eth0 device
it was a sit0. I tried and read everything that I
could and could not figure out a way to get the eth0.
I tried to compile the driver like
I did a lsmod and it was not listed so I assumed that
it was not installed... So I did not set it up. I'll
chceck it out.
--- David Raleigh Arnold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get tons every time I boot up, but it works fine.
> Does yours work?
>
>
-
I get tons every time I boot up, but it works fine. Does yours work?
Information is not knowledge. Belief is not truth.
Indoctrination is not teaching. Tradition is not evidence.
David Raleigh Arnold [EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I recently compiled kernel 2.4.2 and am having a difficult time getting
> the tulip driver module to load. The module loads fine using kernel
> 2.2.18 (from /etc/modules) without passing an
also sprach Curtis Hogg (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 11:11:49PM -0700):
> > ifconfig tells you what? i/o addresses? that's news to me...
>
> It's done that for about as long as I can remember. At least a couple
> years.
diamond:~# uname -a[47]
Linux
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, MaD dUCK wrote:
> also sprach Jacob Stowell (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 11:52:25PM -0500):
> > I checked ifconfig and it told me that my ethernet card has a base
> > address:
> > 0x7000 and an interrupt of 10.
>
> ifconfig tells you what? i/o addresses? that's news to me...
It's done
also sprach Jacob Stowell (on Wed, 07 Mar 2001 11:52:25PM -0500):
> I checked ifconfig and it told me that my ethernet card has a base
> address:
> 0x7000 and an interrupt of 10.
ifconfig tells you what? i/o addresses? that's news to me...
> When I type modprobe tulip io=0x7000 irq=10 it says tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I have been trying to find the module for a tulip network card in the
> insallation disks, but have not succeeded.
What specific make and model of tulip is it? Some of them aren't
supporte
On Sun, May 28, 2000 at 12:53:32PM +1000, Damon Muller wrote
> Hi gang,
>
> I know that this has come up on the list recently, but I haven't really
> seen anything that has helped me solve this little problem.
>
> I have a couple of tulip-based ethernet cards (I think they are made by
> Acton, an
On Sun, 28 May 2000, Damon Muller wrote:
> I have a couple of tulip-based ethernet cards (I think they are made by
> Acton, and may certainly be re-badged), one in my Debian box and one in
> my win98 box. They are connected together by an 8-port 10/100 switch
> (specifically a LanTech MINI Switch
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> If anyone would like the driver I compiled, I wouldn't mind to send it
> directly to the addresses of anyone who ask me, if you don't mind about
> the something like NSA_KEY that I found on the code :) Please, just
> kiding! The arch
I have a DEC PCI network card. I use the tulip driver in kernel 2.0.36 and
it works just fine. I don't know if it is the same card, but it is the
same series.
Allan
On Wed, Dec 08, 1999 at 03:15:44PM -0800, aphro wrote:
> which driver(s) have you tried? i am using 2 of those cards using the
>
which driver(s) have you tried? i am using 2 of those cards using the
tulip driver on kernel 2.0.36 for about a year now with no trouble.
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:40:05:30:FF:19
inet addr:208.222.179.31 Bcast:208.222.179.255
Mask:255.255.255.0
UP BROADCAST R
Gary Hennigan wrote:
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/tulip.html
>
> For information and source code for the driver, tulip.c
>
> There's lots of info there for the tulip-based cards.
>
> Of course if you do decide to get an updated the driver you'll have to
> rebuild the kernel.
>
I recently purchased a couple of the new EtherFast cards, and yes the default
tulip driver didnt work.
http://www.linksys.com actually has tulip.c files for
their cards, and they're on the linksys floppies too. After doing a
kernel/module compile they work great for me.
found at http://www.l
I recently purchased a couple of the new EtherFast cards, and yes the
default tulip driver didnt work.
http://www.linksys.com actually has tulip.c files for their cards, and
they're on the linksys floppies too. After doing a kernel/module
compile they work great for me.
found at
http://www.links
Jose Roberto de Chermont Teixeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does someone have already had problems with the DEC PCI Ethernet DC21142
> network card? I thought it was defective, but on Nt it works. I have
> isntalled Debian and FreeBSD to see what was the problem but both can't
> use them. The c
Hi,
tulip.c:v0.89H 5/23/98 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eth0: Digital DS21140 Tulip at 0x6100, 00 c0 f0 17 16 0d, IRQ 11.
eth0: EEPROM default media type Autosense.
eth0: Index #0 - Media MII (#11) described by a 21140 MII PHY (1) block.
eth0: MII transceiver found at MDIO address 1, config 3000 status 782
George, thanks for info,
I'll think about it.
Eugene.
On Sun, 23 May 1999, George Bonser wrote:
>
> Why not use gigabit ethernet? There are a few cards that are supported
> under Linux. See
> http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/index.html#gigabit
> for more details.
>
George, thanks for advices,
The need for such setup was due to the estimated bandwith of overall
network transaction of about 0.5Gps. Thus, using CISCO or any other
non-PC based solution we need to establish high speed interface between
this switcher and some proxy server. The idea is that attach
>
> Hi ppl, today I had a problems with DEC21143 tulip cards. The problem was
> that card goes into 10mps mode just after linux loading. It seems that
> there are problems with tulip drivers. Tommorow I will try to recompile
> the kernel defining default media type 100baseTx. Probably this will he
Jeff Beley wrote:
>
> I have a debian linux machine on my network with 2 tulip cards in it.
> On boot up I get a kernel message (and the machine seems to stop dead):
> eth0: 21142 100baseTx link beat good.
> What does this mean? And how do i fix it?
>
It means it is working at 100ba
Hi,
Thank for the Tulip drive information! I'd like to know
how do I find out that my NIC is running at 100 instead
of 10.
Joel Klecker wrote:
>
> At 10:38 -0400 1998-05-10, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
> >> Does the hamm/kernel_2.0.33 include the Tulip network drive?
> >
> >Yes, but you may n
At 10:38 -0400 1998-05-10, Alex Yukhimets wrote:
>> Does the hamm/kernel_2.0.33 include the Tulip network drive?
>
>Yes, but you may need to download and compile newer version of the "tulip"
>driver depending on the particular card you use. (I had to.)
Also, the de4x5 driver is better, Documenta
Yo-
> > > > Does the hamm/kernel_2.0.33 include the Tulip network drive?
> > >
> > > Yes, but you may need to download and compile newer version of the "tulip"
> > > driver depending on the particular card you use. (I had to.)
>
> > I have a NetGear 10/100 Fast Ethenet Card. Does this requ
> (Alex Yukhimets) wrote:
> >
> > > Does the hamm/kernel_2.0.33 include the Tulip network drive?
> >
> > Yes, but you may need to download and compile newer version of the "tulip"
> > driver depending on the particular card you use. (I had to.)
> I have a NetGear 10/100 Fast Ethenet Card. D
> Does the hamm/kernel_2.0.33 include the Tulip network drive?
Yes, but you may need to download and compile newer version of the "tulip"
driver depending on the particular card you use. (I had to.)
Alex Y.
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +---+
|
On Fri, 2 Jan 1998, Ian Keith Setford wrote:
>
> Hi-
>
> I am having no luck getting a new ethernet card up. I just installed a
> new card with a DEC "tulip" chip and I can't get it working. Does anyone
> have a "tulip" card working? If so, could you share with me how you got
> it running?
>
>I am having no luck getting a new ethernet card up. I just installed a
>new card with a DEC "tulip" chip and I can't get it working. Does anyone
>have a "tulip" card working? If so, could you share with me how you got
>it running?
compile the tulip driver as module, and use "option=XX" or "opt
55 matches
Mail list logo
