:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tekram dc-390u2w and kernel 2.6.0
> my scsi card (Tekram
> dc-390u2w) was working fine using the sym53c8xx driver built into the
> kernel.
I don't know about the sym53c8xx driver. I have a Tekram DC395UW, and I
use the dc395x driver. It wor
> my scsi card (Tekram
> dc-390u2w) was working fine using the sym53c8xx driver built into the
> kernel.
I don't know about the sym53c8xx driver. I have a Tekram DC395UW, and I
use the dc395x driver. It works fine. It's just been integrated into
the kernel source for the first time since 2.6.
Thanks for the reply. Out of curiosity, what are
you considering as "newer" kernels. I was able to
compile the tekram dc390x_ncr driver for the
dc390u2w both in a 2.2.16 kernel and as a module
in that kernel with no errors, but I haven't tried
to run them yet. This still leaves the original
p
0 7:07 AM
> To: tjm
> Cc: debian_user_list
> Subject: Re: tekram dc-390u2w
>
>
>
> No idea if their driver has anything over the stock kernel
> driver. Only
> thing I notice with my u2w was the lack of activity light after kernel
> boot. Of course my new case doesn&#x
No idea if their driver has anything over the stock kernel driver. Only
thing I notice with my u2w was the lack of activity light after kernel
boot. Of course my new case doesn't even have a second HDD light. :/
On Sun, 16 Jul 2000, tjm wrote:
> Hi. I'm about to install a tekram dc390u2w scsi
>
5 matches
Mail list logo
