also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.0329 +0100]:
> > "kernel-image-2.2.20" (you don't want to run < 20, and 2.4 isn't
> > ready for production in many peoples' opinion (i use it for
> > production though)).
>
> IMHO, the added flexibility of iptables beats makes 2.4 safer than 2
also sprach Adam Majer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.0329 +0100]:
> IMHO, the added flexibility of iptables beats makes 2.4 safer than 2.2
> - just just need to set up uptables Right.
i agree with you fully. iptables has the potential to be called a
firewall. ipchains is a level 4 packet filter.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 01:00:30AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach justin cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1907 +0100]:
> > Given the above details what's the best way to approach the project?
>
> to add just what you want, so you will probably want to add "ssh" and
> maybe s
also sprach justin cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.0226 +0100]:
> Thanks a bunch Martin! Your response was exactly what I was looking
> for.
no prob. i do it this way all the time. let us know if you have any
problems...
--
martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.
Thanks a bunch Martin! Your response was exactly what I was looking
for.
-Original Message-
From: martin f krafft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 4:01 PM
To:
Subject: Re: suggestions welcome
also sprach justin cunningham <[EMAIL PROTEC
also sprach justin cunningham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.15.1907 +0100]:
> Given the above details what's the best way to approach the project?
easy: install, but when asked about tasksel and/or dselect, select "no"
both times. i don't recall what exactly is in this vanilla system that
you'll th
6 matches
Mail list logo
