Re: strange package dependencies

2000-09-14 Thread Christoph Groth
Joachim Trinkwitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > So apt wants to replace libesd-alsa0 with libesd0. But why? > > Sure, xtux depends on `libesd0 (>= 0.2.14-0.2)' but `libesd-alsa > > 0.2.17-7' which is installed provides `libesd0'. What is the > > point in replacing `libesd-alsa 0.2.17-7' with `

Re: strange package dependencies

2000-09-13 Thread Joachim Trinkwitz
Christoph Groth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So apt wants to replace libesd-alsa0 with libesd0. But why? Sure, > xtux depends on `libesd0 (>= 0.2.14-0.2)' but `libesd-alsa 0.2.17-7' > which is installed provides `libesd0'. What is the point in replacing > `libesd-alsa 0.2.17-7' with `libesd0 0

RE: strange package dependencies

2000-09-11 Thread Sean 'Shaleh' Perry
> > So apt wants to replace libesd-alsa0 with libesd0. But why? Sure, > xtux depends on `libesd0 (>= 0.2.14-0.2)' but `libesd-alsa 0.2.17-7' > which is installed provides `libesd0'. What is the point in replacing > `libesd-alsa 0.2.17-7' with `libesd0 0.2.17-7'? > the problem lies in the fact