Kent West wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 12:14 AM, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the machine having the 2.6.22 kernel, I can not. Here's the error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbmount //faculty/web netShares/web/
Password:
mount error 2 = No such file or directory
Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manua
Michael Marsh wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 12:14 AM, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On the machine having the 2.6.22 kernel, I can not. Here's the error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbmount //faculty/web netShares/web/
Password:
mount error 2 = No such file or directory
Refer to the mount.cifs(8)
On Jan 31, 2008 12:14 AM, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the machine having the 2.6.22 kernel, I can not. Here's the error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbmount //faculty/web netShares/web/
> Password:
> mount error 2 = No such file or directory
> Refer to the mount.cifs(8) manual page (e.g
> I have two Debian boxes:
> On the machine having the 2.6.18 kernel, with the "real"
> /usr/bin/smbmount command, I can mount an SMB file system exported from
> a Sun 5.9 box.
>
> On the machine having the 2.6.22 kernel, I can not. Here's the error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ smbmount //faculty/web
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 17:34:39 +0100
Lubos Vrbka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi,
>
> > smbfs 3.0.21a-4 works fine here (on sid amd64)
> well, smbfs from sid worked for me correctly when i mount a share
> running this version of the server. however, when trying to mount a
> share running
hi,
smbfs 3.0.21a-4 works fine here (on sid amd64)
well, smbfs from sid worked for me correctly when i mount a share
running this version of the server. however, when trying to mount a
share running sarge, i had no luck.
However, I'm using cifs which is the latest implementation of
On (02/02/06 16:52), Lubos Vrbka wrote:
> hi,
>
> >smbmount and smbclient from sid (both i386 and amd64) seem to fail to
> >connect to our local samba server (running sarge, iirc).
> >
> >smbmount //server/share mnt_point
> >gives me
> >4748: Connection to server failed
> >SMB connection failed
>
hi,
smbmount and smbclient from sid (both i386 and amd64) seem to fail to
connect to our local samba server (running sarge, iirc).
smbmount //server/share mnt_point
gives me
4748: Connection to server failed
SMB connection failed
surprisingly the number changes every time this command is issu
Khanh Cao Van wrote:
>I could not do it
>
>cvkhanh:~# apt-get install smbfs smbclient samba-common
>Reading Package Lists... Done
>Building Dependency Tree... Done
>E: Couldn't find package smbfs
>
>I've use apt-cdrom add and apt-get update before used those above
>command but it did not effect .
Khanh Cao Van wrote:
>I have just the CD 1 of Debian 3.1 , all another deb packages was in
>the other server that run samba . After finishing install base
>component of debian , I would like to mount to the shared forder on
>that server but could not findout the smbclient or smbmount ! ! ! !
>
>H
On (20/12/04 14:59), Gonzalo Sainz-Trápaga wrote:
> Hi, I posted this message on debian-testing and someone recommmended
> posting here instead. The original message follows. Since samba 2.2
> went EOL lately, I upgraded Samba on the server to samba 3.0 from
> backports.org after writing this messa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Jody Grafals wrote:
> If I can't get the thing to mount the way I want it, Can I somehow give the
> user (myself) root access to this directory?
Yes. Use sudo. apt-get install sudo first (if you don't have it)
Create a script in
Using the syntax below did the trick; things seem to work better when
mount invokes smbmount instead of doing it manually. Thanks !!!
mount -t smbfs -o username=username,uid=username //downtown/sysback
/mnt/smb/downtown
> Hi,
>
> go to /mnt directory anda verify who is the owner of smb subdirecto
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 06:52:44AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> smbmount -> windows(CIFS/SAMBA server?) using win32 drivers->NTFS (R/W)
> smbmount -> linux SAMBA server(CIFS/SAMBA server?) using linux modules ->NTFS (read
> only)
> smbmount -> linux SAMBA server(CIFS/SAMBA server?) using 'captive'
Hi,
go to /mnt directory anda verify who is the owner of smb subdirectory
and what is the access permission to it.
try it as root:
cd /mnt
chown -R username smb
chmod -R 760 smb
mount -t smbfs -o username=username,uid=username //downtown/sysback
/mnt/smb/downtown
mount will ask for username passw
Hi,
On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:59:17 -0400, Jody Grafals
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Still not getting anywhere, the options gid uid umask seem to have no
> effect with smbmount and due to the way need to access w2k3 shares. I
> have only been able to mount the drive using the command smbmount.
Still not getting anywhere, the options gid uid umask seem to have no
effect with smbmount and due to the way need to access w2k3 shares. I
have only been able to mount the drive using the command smbmount. I
have not been able to get fstab or `mont -t smbfs` to pass the proper
authentication to th
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 05:57:33AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:41:49AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:19:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Can anyone tell me what I need to do to get write access to the mount
> > > bellow as a regulare user
Hi Jody,
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 16:19:52 -0400 (EDT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what I need to do to get write access to the mount
> bellow as a regulare user. Its a windows 2003 server with signing off.
> Everything seems to works well as root.
> smbmount //d
Kevin Mark wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:19:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone tell me what I need to do to get write access to the mount
bellow as a regulare user. Its a windows 2003 server with signing off.
Everything seems to works well as root.
smbmount //downtown/sysback /
On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 02:41:49AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:19:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me what I need to do to get write access to the mount
> > bellow as a regulare user. Its a windows 2003 server with signing off.
> > Everything seems
> Can anyone tell me what I need to do to get write access to the mount
> bellow as a regulare user. Its a windows 2003 server with signing off.
> Everything seems to works well as root.
> smbmount //downtown/sysback /mnt/smb/downtown/ -o
> username=username/servername%'!password' gid=100 uid=1000
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 04:19:52PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can anyone tell me what I need to do to get write access to the mount
> bellow as a regulare user. Its a windows 2003 server with signing off.
> Everything seems to works well as root.
> smbmount //downtown/sysback /mnt/smb/downt
On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:37:35 +1000, Robert William Hutton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been having problems with smbmount. I've noticed this on both my desktop
> and laptop computers. Both are running sid, updated regularly. The symptoms of
> the problem are:
>
> - mount a share (either fr
Martin Kacerovsky wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:06:59PM +0100, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
[..]
apt-get install smbfs
He posted error output of 'smbmount' command, which is part of
smbfs package along with 'smbumount' ...
So I guess he has 'smbfs' package installed :)
Bye.
Yeah, mabye
bu
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 10:06:59PM +0100, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
>
[..]
>
> apt-get install smbfs
>
He posted error output of 'smbmount' command, which is part of
smbfs package along with 'smbumount' ...
So I guess he has 'smbfs' package installed :)
Bye.
--
+--
Brian wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Debian 3.0 i386. I think the kernel is 2.2.20. At least that's what's returned when I do "uname -a".
My problem is I can't run smbmount using Debian. The error is:
"ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
smbmnt f
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 12:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: smbmount
>
> --
> So, my little one-eyed one, on
> what POOR, PITIFUL, DEFENSELESS
> planet
On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 20:52:18 +0100
Martin Kacerovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> for hints about compiling a new kernel see Linux Kernel HOWTO
> ( packages usually needed : gcc binutils make libncurses5-dev )
For better hints check out the kernel compiling newbiedoc:
http://newbiedoc.sourcefor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 March 2003 09:16 am, Brian wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Debian 3.0 i386. I think the kernel is 2.2.20. At least
> that's what's returned when I do "uname -a".
>
> My problem is I can't run smbmount using Debian. The error is:
> "ERROR: s
I'll offer apologies up top if there's anything funky about the way in which
this posting is formatted: it is largely out of my control until I get Exim4
running, because it is sent via the WWW ATTWorldNet emailer interface from
MSDoze95. I have no control over how that software mutilates my mes
Brian wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Debian 3.0 i386. I think the kernel is 2.2.20. At least that's what's returned when I do "uname -a".
My problem is I can't run smbmount using Debian. The error is:
"ERROR: smbfs filesystem not supported by the kernel
Please refer to the smbmnt(8) manual page
smbmnt
> -Original Message-
> From: Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 10:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: smbmount
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Debian 3.0 i386. I think the kernel is 2.2.20. At
> least that's what's returned when I do "uname -a".
>
> My p
Mark Schouten sez:
} On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:39:02PM +0100, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
} > Hello,
} >
} > ATM the line //WILLEM-JAN/muziek /muziek smbfs ro,uid=1000,gid=1000
} > is in fstab, but when I reboot this directory isn't mounted because
} > there's asked for a password, but I
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:39:02PM +0100, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ATM the line //WILLEM-JAN/muziek /muziek smbfs ro,uid=1000,gid=1000
> is in fstab, but when I reboot this directory isn't mounted
> because there's asked for a password, but I don't need to
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:39:02PM +0100, Willem-Jan Meijer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> ATM the line //WILLEM-JAN/muziek /muziek smbfs ro,uid=1000,gid=1000
> is in fstab, but when I reboot this directory isn't mounted because there's
> asked for a password, but I don't need to give a passwor
Petteri Heinonen wrote:
>
> >
> > Petteri Heinonen wrote:
> > >
> > > I've a problem with smbmount when trying to mount as ordinary
> > > (not root) user. I can mount samba shares if I mount them
> > > under ordinary users own home directory, for exmple in
> > > /home/orduser/mnt/ . Also, I can mo
>
> Petteri Heinonen wrote:
> >
> > I've a problem with smbmount when trying to mount as ordinary
> > (not root) user. I can mount samba shares if I mount them
> > under ordinary users own home directory, for exmple in
> > /home/orduser/mnt/ . Also, I can mount other hard drive
> > partitions und
Petteri Heinonen wrote:
>
> I've a problem with smbmount when trying to mount as ordinary
> (not root) user. I can mount samba shares if I mount them
> under ordinary users own home directory, for exmple in
> /home/orduser/mnt/ . Also, I can mount other hard drive
> partitions under /mnt/ as ord
On Wed, 12 Jul 2000, Keith G. Murphy wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > thanx for the replies, it is all working now...
> >
> > it is weird how a redhat Samba rpm package would have smbmount/smbclient
> > included whereas a Debian Samba package doesn't.
> >
> Not everyone who uses samb
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> thanx for the replies, it is all working now...
>
> it is weird how a redhat Samba rpm package would have smbmount/smbclient
> included whereas a Debian Samba package doesn't.
>
Not everyone who uses samba needs both of those. For instance, I use
samba, and smbmount
hared directory
or
2) nfs mount from an AIX NFS shared directory with no_root_squash?
Corey Popelier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/07/2000 21:20:29
To: Zane Drysdale/Diagnostic Labs/64
cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: smbmount
smbfs is actually a package - apt-get instal
smbfs is actually a package - apt-get install smbfs
You also need SMB support compiled into the kernel for those commands to
work. (I dont know if you can do it as a module, havent tried).
Cheers,
Corey Popelier
http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas
Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 11
On Tue, 11 Jul 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
i have installed samba-2.0.5a-1.deb and it does not contain either
smbclient or smbmount. the debian search-contents feature on the debian
home page has indicated that smbmount is in the "otherosfs/smbfs" which i
Thanks to all in helping me get my "smbumount" command working.
The "umount" command seems to work when the "smbumount" command fails,
but as Marc pointed out, you can 't have any file descriptors still
"using" the mount point. In my case, I had Netscape storing it's
profile/email stuff on the net
hi,
i had some problems with my smbmounts when the NT server would reboot
(haha) and i would lose the connections. the mount point would then give a
"input/output" error if i tried to do anything with it.
one day i noticed that my eterm that i mounted those points from was
asking for "Password:"
Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
> From linux-2.2.10-ac5/Documentation/filesystems/smbfs.txt :)
aah, i forgot to look there. but anyway, i'v 2.2.9 running. just got 2.2.10
and going to install..
> [...]
> Mount-Time Options
> Windows 95 has several bugs that affect SMB operations, and smbfs includes
> wor
On Wed, Jul 14, 1999 at 01:04:51PM +0200, Gerhard Kroder wrote:
> found some strange behaviour of smbmount-2.2.x, is it me or is it smb?
>
> doing "smbmount-2.2.x '\\ntserver\user' user -U user -c 'mount
> /mnt/smb/user -u myname -g 0' " mounts as expected, but touching a
> file in smbmounte
I believe this is a bug that occurs when the "Windows 95 Bug Workaround" is
enabled in the kernel or kernel module. Recompile your kernel without the
bug workaround enabled. For more information:
http://www.lwn.net/1999/0610/a/rh-smbfs.html
rgds-- TA ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Gerhard Kroder wrote:
> found some strange behaviour of smbmount-2.2.x, is it me or is it smb?
>
> doing "smbmount-2.2.x '\\ntserver\user' user -U user -c 'mount
> /mnt/smb/user -u myname -g 0' " mounts as expected, but touching a
> file in smbmounted dir gives random timestamps instead of
Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: SMBMOUNT won't
> Date: Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 01:56:16PM +0200
>
> In reply to:Mirek Kwasniak
>
> Quoting Mirek Kwasniak([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 10:25:52AM -0400, Alec Smith wrote:
Subject: Re: SMBMOUNT won't
Date: Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 01:21:34PM -0400
In reply to:Alec Smith
Quoting Alec Smith([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> The smbmount-2.1.x thing is for the 2.1/2.2 kernels.
>
Yes, I am running 2.2.5.
> Using the info from Mirek works great for
hen I can come up with something for you.
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Wayne Topa wrote:
>
> Subject: Re: SMBMOUNT won't
> Date: Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 01:56:16PM +0200
>
> In reply to:Mirek Kwasniak
>
> Quoting Mirek Kwasniak([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On
Subject: Re: SMBMOUNT won't
Date: Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 01:56:16PM +0200
In reply to:Mirek Kwasniak
Quoting Mirek Kwasniak([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 10:25:52AM -0400, Alec Smith wrote:
> > Got a sample syntax? I use
> >
> > smbmou
On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 10:34:05AM -0400, Alec Smith wrote:
> Thanks... Problem appears to be solved. By the way, it seemed to work as
> \\\Condor\NTC -- Note the third \
Yes, I didn't notice that you wrote
"\\CONDOR\NTC"
I use syntax like
'\\CONDOR\NTC'
It's so because shell interprete
*- On 15 Apr, Alec Smith wrote about "Re: SMBMOUNT won't"
>
> Since you seem to know what's going on, there is a not-fatal error about
> /etc/lmhosts not existing during the mount. What is the format of this
> file and how is it used?
>
man lmhosts
DESCRIPT
Thanks... Problem appears to be solved. By the way, it seemed to work as
\\\Condor\NTC -- Note the third \
Since you seem to know what's going on, there is a not-fatal error about
/etc/lmhosts not existing during the mount. What is the format of this
file and how is it used?
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999
On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 10:25:52AM -0400, Alec Smith wrote:
> Got a sample syntax? I use
>
> smbmount-2.1.x "\\CONDOR\NTC" -c 'mount /home/sweetin/mnt'
>
smbmount-2.1.x service [-p port] [-d debuglevel] [-l log]
^
You need form:
smbmount-2.1.x "\\CONDOR\NTC"
FWIW when I do an smbmount here I have to use the -I switch followed by
the IP address of the machine I'm accessing. An example is:
smbmount \\george\d /mnt -I 192.168.1.2
I don't know why, but that's what it took for smbmount to work here.
--
Mike Werner KA8YSD | "Where do you want t
Got a sample syntax? I use
smbmount-2.1.x "\\CONDOR\NTC" -c 'mount /home/sweetin/mnt'
with absolutely no luck... That appears to be what is in the manpages for
smbmount-2.1.x, except smbmount doesn't appear to be installed I have
smbfsx_1.9.18p10-7.deb installed from Slink.
On Kernel 2.0.x,
No need to do that. The smbfsx package has been compiled with 2.2.x
kernel headers and everything is ready to go with the 2.2.x kernels.
Your problem might be that the syntax of smbmount changed from the
smbfs package to the smbfsx package. Take a look at the parameters you
are using.
peloy.-
Al
Tried rebuilding and got a bunch of errors about some odd thing being
redefined or some such.
On Thu, 15 Apr 1999, Graham Ashton wrote:
> On Thursday 15 April, Alec Smith wrote:
>
> > I'm running kernel 2.2.5 with smbfsx installed from the deb... I get the
> > attached error... Any tips would
On Thursday 15 April, Alec Smith wrote:
> I'm running kernel 2.2.5 with smbfsx installed from the deb... I get the
> attached error... Any tips would be appreciated.
you need to recompile smbmount with 2.2.x kernels. I've never done it, but
have read that it needs doing.
--
Graham
I'm running kernel 2.2.5 with smbfsx installed from the deb... I get the
attached error... Any tips would be appreciated. I have no problems
mounting from this workstation under NT to the particular file server
giving the error. Previously I used 2.0.36 without difficulty.
/proc/filesystems does i
On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, Graham Ashton wrote:
[snip]
> > Dont you have to use "\\" instead of "//"???
>
> no.
Hmm.. You are right.. I used it yesterday for the first time in 3 months..
My apologies.
Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
PGP Key available, reply
On Sunday 21 March, Michael Beattie wrote:
> > ShadowGate:/root# smbmount //dahouse/c_on_dahouse /dahouse -U BW07442 -P
> > shadowgate.com -I 192.168.0.10
> > mount error: Operation not supported by device Please look at
> > smbmount's manual page for possible reasons
> >
> > I
On Sat, 20 Mar 1999, Brant Wells wrote:
>
> Howdy All...
howdy :)
> I have started having an SMBMOUNT problem, mounting a shared folder off of an
> NT Server machine...It was working before I had to re-compile my kernel
> 2.0.34 to have vfat & sound support...The only other change I've made
*- On 29 Jan, Peter Karlsson wrote about "smbmount and Linux 2.2.0?"
> Where can I find a smbmount that works with Linux 2.2.0 in a Debian archive?
> None of those I've found seem to work (the kernel complains about it being
> the wrong version).
>
> Please reply with cc to me.
I just answered th
here's another working example. in my case, the
Win95 host is not on the same ethernet subnet as my
debian (slink) host, so I use a command like:
smbmount //spunk/E spunk-e -I spunk.spanky.org -U spazwit
(host and user names changed to protect the innocent)
Sebastian Canagaratna wrote:
>
> I
I have used the command:
smbmount //HS03/scanagar /mnt -U scanagaratna
to mount a filesystem scanagar on maching HS03 on /mnt on my harddrive.
So I do not understand the problem. HS04 runs NT, and run Debian Linux 2.1
Sebastian Canagaratna
Department of Chemistry
Ohio Northern University
Ada,
Jérôme Zago <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "smbclient //servif3/user4if -U jzago" works just fine but I would like to
> mount this share to /mnt/servif3.
>
> "Usage: smbmount-2.1.x service [-p port] [-d debuglevel] [-l log]"
> it seems like smbclient. where does I provide the mount point ?
smbm
What kernel version are you using???
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't figure how to mount SMB shares...
>
> "smbclient //servif3/user4if -U jzago" works just fine but I would like to
> mount this share to /mnt/servif3.
smbclient works with _any_ kernel version (2.0.x, 2.1.x, and
2.2.0prex)
On Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 05:11:34PM +0100, Jérôme Zago wrote:
> I can't figure how to mount SMB shares...
>
> "smbclient //servif3/user4if -U jzago" works just fine but I would like to
> mount this share to /mnt/servif3.
>
> "Usage: smbmount-2.1.x service [-p port] [-d debuglevel] [-l log]"
> it
Hi!
Marc Haber ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> How can I do smbmounts via /etc/fstab?
I'm not 100% sure if this is the correct link, but you might take a look at
http://www-scf.usc.edu/~vibber/linux/smbfs.html . IIRC there are at least
some links to patches against mount to do this. I can't verify the lin
"Ralf G. R. Bergs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, 19 Nov 1998 19:15:43 + (GMT), Marc Haber wrote:
>
> >How can I do smbmounts via /etc/fstab?
>
> To the best of my knowledge, this does not (yet) work. Mount doesn't know
> about
> smbfs, you *must* use smbmount. :-(
But you can take
*- Marc Haber wrote about "smbmount via /etc/fstab?"
> Hi!
>
> My Linux box does not have a CD-ROM drive (and it's stacked away in
> the closet anyway, so I'd not want to use a CD-ROM drive connected
> there directly if it had one) so I usually access CDs by smbmounting
> the CD-ROM drive from my
On Thu, 19 Nov 1998 19:15:43 + (GMT), Marc Haber wrote:
>How can I do smbmounts via /etc/fstab?
To the best of my knowledge, this does not (yet) work. Mount doesn't know about
smbfs, you *must* use smbmount. :-(
--
Ralf G. R. Bergs * Welkenrather Str. 100/102 * 52074 Aachen * Germany
+49-
> what I want. I want to make a sharepoint on my NT workstation Sp3
SP3 disables login without encryption
> Heres what I have tried
> smbmount //server/sharepoint /mnt -U anyone
> But this doesn't work
> Now
> smbclient '\\server\sharepoint" -U anyone
I think that you have compiled samba with
Gunnar Strand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've recently gotten myself a little local network and have decided
> to run my old 486 as server for exporting its large HD by using samba.
> My new PC (the client) has both Linux and Win95 bootable + the old
> 1GB HD. Now, I want to minimize the Linux
I'm not sure about the package management issue but I would definely use
NFS in this case isntead of samba. SMB is missing some important
filesystem features, such as permission bits and file ownership that you
generally really want to have on /usr.
Nate
On Thu, 25 Jun 1998, Gunnar Strand wrote
On Sat, 28 Sep 1996, Jim Pick wrote:
> > smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
> >
> > is there a way to fix this problem
> >
> You can compile the kernel to use long file names. This is an
> experimental feature. One problem though - it doesn't work!!
> There are some m
> smbmount does not preserve the long filenames of windows 95
>
> is there a way to fix this problem
>
> -thanks
>
> Oz
>
You can compile the kernel to use long file names. This is an
experimental feature. One problem though - it doesn't work!!
There are some major bugs in the implementat
82 matches
Mail list logo
