Re: CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-16 Thread Walter Hurry
On Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:32:39 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:46:55 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote: > >> I don't know about that. Sure, I subscribe to the most used ones, or >> that I might start using more, but if I have a one off question... >> Although I wouldn't ask for a CC, I wou

Re: CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-16 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 11:46:55 -0700, Kelly Clowers wrote: > I don't know about that. Sure, I subscribe to the most used ones, or > that I might start using more, but if I have a one off question... > Although I wouldn't ask for a CC, I would check the archives. And I have > subscribed, asked a ques

Re: CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-15 Thread Lisi
On Thursday 15 March 2012 18:26:30 Walter Hurry wrote: > But even if I could cc, I don't think I would. I regard it as > discourteous to seek help from a mailing list without even bothering to > subscribe to it. I saw a complaint on another list about people who subscribe, ask a question, and the

Re: CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-15 Thread Kelly Clowers
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:26, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:57:52 +, Camaleón wrote: > >> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:48:24 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote: >> >>> Hello Camaleón, >>> >>> Camaleón wrote: On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:08:00 -0700, Mike Alborn wrote: > Please CC me as

Re: CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-15 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 18:26:30 +, Walter Hurry wrote: (...) > But even if I could cc, I don't think I would. I regard it as > discourteous to seek help from a mailing list without even bothering to > subscribe to it. Agree with that :-) But I have to say that I'm also in the role of the "spor

Re: CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-15 Thread Walter Hurry
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 16:57:52 +, Camaleón wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:48:24 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote: > >> Hello Camaleón, >> >> Camaleón wrote: >>> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:08:00 -0700, Mike Alborn wrote: >>> > Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. >>> >>> I can't CC, sorry

Re: CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-15 Thread Camaleón
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:48:24 +0100, Claudius Hubig wrote: > Hello Camaleón, > > Camaleón wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:08:00 -0700, Mike Alborn wrote: >> > Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. >> >> I can't CC, sorry :-( > > At least Claws-Mail supports an additional To: Header w

CC-ing & gmane (was: Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid)

2012-03-15 Thread Claudius Hubig
Hello Camaleón, Camaleón wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:08:00 -0700, Mike Alborn wrote: > > Please CC me as I'm not subscribed to the list. > > I can't CC, sorry :-( At least Claws-Mail supports an additional To: Header when posting via Gmane. Best regards, Claudius -- Confidence is the fee

Re: QuickCam Orbit AF Pan/Tilt Broken in Sid

2012-03-15 Thread Camaleón
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 14:08:00 -0700, Mike Alborn wrote: > I have a Logitech QuickCam Orbit AF (USB ID 046d:0994). The Pan/Tilt > controls work fine under Debian Squeeze, but they fail under Debian Sid. > > When I plug in the camera, udev runs uvcdynctrl to load the pan/tilt > controls into the dri

Re: Re: quickcam on 2.6.11 - driver issue

2005-08-06 Thread Frank Guthorel
-- Frank Guthorel T : 09/329.49.38 - G : 0495/105.776 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.codedor.be signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: quickcam on 2.6.11 - driver issue

2005-08-01 Thread Kevin Mark
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 07:39:39PM +0200, Frank Guthorel wrote: > Hi, > > > After this - the message > > /quickcam: version magic '2.6.11-1-686 686 gcc-4.0' should be > '2.6.11-1-686 686 gcc-3.3'/ > > > keeps on returning on each step. > > > So - to recapitulate : > 3. Apparently - t

RE: quickcam

2002-09-10 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 04:10, jfcarvajal wrote: > > >>Can you define "for a while" and "a little longer"? Are these 1 hour, 10 > >> minutes, 5 seconds at maybe four frames a second? > > "for a while" : aprox 15 seconds > "a little longer": aprox 45 seconds > Yes, about four frames per second >

RE: quickcam

2002-09-10 Thread jfcarvajal
>>Can you define "for a while" and "a little longer"? Are these 1 hour, 10 >> minutes, 5 seconds at maybe four frames a second? "for a while" : aprox 15 seconds "a little longer": aprox 45 seconds Yes, about four frames per second Besides the quickcam I have a USB epson scanner that works p

Re: quickcam

2002-09-10 Thread Mark L. Kahnt
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 02:45, jfcarvajal wrote: > Hi! > > I've have installed a logitech quickcam express on my Debian Woody box. It > seems to work for a while, what is more if i use xawtv it works a little > longer than unsing gqcam before it hangs. > > Can any one give me a hint on what is go