Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-25 Thread Brendan Cully
On Friday, 25 August 2000 at 03:17, John Bacalle wrote: > Since you're talking about procmail, how would you do something like the > following? > >:0: >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >IN.debian > > This is schematic, of course; how to do properly

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-25 Thread Sven Burgener
Hello I find the following snippet useful: # Official debian mailing lists :0 H: * ^X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * ^X-Loop: debian-\/[EMAIL PROTECTED] $DEBIAN/debian-$MATCH This'll place debian-WHATEVER in the file ~/Mail/debian/debian-WHATEVER. It is flexible. AFAIR, the first rule is just for ma

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-25 Thread Will Trillich
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 11:14:52AM -0500, Brent Harding wrote: > They should make a procmail howto. they do. you just gotta find it! > At 03:24 AM 8/25/00 -0500, you wrote: > > > > http://www.ii.com/internet/robots/procmail/qs/ that's the best one i've seen so far.

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-25 Thread Will Trillich
On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 09:05:22PM -0700, Dale L . Morris wrote: > I'm wondering if the syntax is correct. This is what I'm using > for a procmail receipe: > > :0: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > debian-user scan the emails you want to group -- look at ALL the headers. list managers usually add their

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-25 Thread Will Trillich
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 04:34:10AM +, Pollywog wrote: > > On 25-Aug-2000 Dale L . Morris wrote: > > I'm wondering if the syntax is correct. This is what I'm using > > for a procmail receipe: > > > >:0: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >^-why the underscore? > I would use * ^To: debi

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-25 Thread André Dahlqvist
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 03:17:05AM -0400, John Bacalle wrote: > Since you're talking about procmail, how would you do something like > the following? > >:0: >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >* [EMAIL PROTECTED] >IN.debian > > This is schematic, of course; how to do p

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-25 Thread André Dahlqvist
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 04:27:52AM +, Geordie Birch wrote: > THUS SPAKE Dale L . Morris, on Aug 24: > > > I'm wondering if the syntax is correct. This is what I'm using > > for a procmail receipe: > > > > :0: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > debian-user > > > > Will it work? > > No. you need

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-24 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Fri, Aug 25, 2000 at 04:27:52AM +, Geordie Birch wrote: > THUS SPAKE Dale L . Morris, on Aug 24: > > > I'm wondering if the syntax is correct. This is what I'm using > > for a procmail receipe: > > > > :0: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > debian-user > > > > Will it work? > > No. you need

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-24 Thread Dale L . Morris
I removed the underscore. It now reads :0: * ^To: debian-user@lists.debian.org debian-user The reason I used the underscore is it was shown that way on the quickstart website. Of course, it didn't work that way.. It did work when I sent myself to messages, one with procmail testing in the header

RE: procmail receipes

2000-08-24 Thread Pollywog
On 25-Aug-2000 Dale L . Morris wrote: > I'm wondering if the syntax is correct. This is what I'm using > for a procmail receipe: > >:0: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^-why the underscore? I would use * ^To: debian-user@lists.debian.org -- Andrew

Re: procmail receipes

2000-08-24 Thread Geordie Birch
THUS SPAKE Dale L . Morris, on Aug 24: > I'm wondering if the syntax is correct. This is what I'm using > for a procmail receipe: > > :0: > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] > debian-user > > Will it work? No. you need a colon, not an underscore. Also, using the 'To' field is suboptimal (the word of the