-
Original Message -From: "John Hasler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
<debian-user@lists.debian.org>Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 12:13
PMSubject: Re: ppp configuration problem> John Davidson
writes:> > However I have an eth0 interface with its own gateway
John Davidson writes:
> However I have an eth0 interface with its own gateway to the rest of my
> internal network.
You almost certainly don't need a default route to your internal network.
> All of this is to sya that I can now make it set the route correctly, but
> I am still unable to ping any
Further investigation reveals that I am experiencing a conflict betweent
'interfaces' and 'pppd'. At least this is what prevents the default gateway
being added. My ISP does not use PAP or CHAP, so I must use a chatscript
with option noauth. However I have an eth0 interface with its own gateway to
The default gateway on my subnet uses a x.x.x.2 address, and after I
manually added it there was still no joy.
John Davidson
- Original Message -
From: "Jason P. Holland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 9:36 AM
Subject: RE: ppp configuration pr
If you manually add a route to the gateway on your subnet of the ip address
your assigned, use a x.x.x.1 address, does it work?
Jason
>
> I am having difficulty getting my modem to communicate
> correctly with my
> ISP. The problem is that once connected I do not get a route
> or gateway that
> a
5 matches
Mail list logo
