Amira Youssef wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I can't find the option to install Sarge from Non-US mirror site.
> I'm afraid that the available packages has some Export restriction from USA.
>
> Do you've an idea where is the non-us CD-iso for Sarge?
non-us is no longe usefull.
Look at: http://lists.debia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Montag, 9. Februar 2004 17:50 schrieb Colin Watson:
> klecker.debian.org, which serves non-us.debian.org and
> security.debian.org, died again about an hour ago with power supply
> problems and won't boot. VA Japan had already donated a new PSU,
> w
Hi Niko
Niko Järvinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> > klecker.debian.org, which serves non-us.debian.org and
>> > security.debian.org, died again about an hour ago [...]
> They seemed to give this URL out in the IRC chan:
> ftp://ftp.rfc822.org/deb
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Epprecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, February 09, 2004 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: non-us/security down again
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > klecker.debian
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> klecker.debian.org, which serves non-us.debian.org and
> security.debian.org, died again about an hour ago with power supply
> problems and won't boot. VA Japan had already donated a new PSU, which
> is due to arrive on Friday; it seems likely that the sy
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:27:50 +,
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 07:22:34PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:17:13 +,
> > Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 07:22:34PM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:17:13 +,
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Just to expand on that, there are currently a grand total of 19
> > packages(18 source packages) left in non-US. Chanc
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 14:17:13 +,
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:28:57PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:08:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> > > Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:28:57PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:08:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Correct. It's low priority to fix, since non-US is essentially a
> > > graveyard anyway.
> >
> > What do you mean exa
Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:08:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:16:45AM +0100, Martin Helas wrote:
> > > > did i miss something, or has there been no package update in non-US
>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 07:08:16AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:16:45AM +0100, Martin Helas wrote:
> > > did i miss something, or has there been no package update in non-US
> > > since 20th of November?
> >
> > Correct. It
Citát Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:16:45AM +0100, Martin Helas wrote:
> > Hi Listreaders,
> >
> > did i miss something, or has there been no package update in non-US
> > since 20th of November?
>
> Correct. It's low priority to fix, since non-US is essentially a
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:16:45AM +0100, Martin Helas wrote:
> Hi Listreaders,
>
> did i miss something, or has there been no package update in non-US
> since 20th of November?
Correct. It's low priority to fix, since non-US is essentially a
graveyard anyway.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson
David writes:
> Strong encription is illegal in the states...
This is not true and never has been.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thursday 18 September 2003 11:04, Juan Pablo wrote:
> It's not clear to me what does Non-US mean?
> I read at
> http://www.debian.org/mirrors/list-non-US.html and I
> conclude it's about software wich is restricted to US
> (i.e. prohibited to export but available from other
> countries)
> But th
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:04:22PM -0700, Juan Pablo wrote:
> It's not clear to me what does Non-US mean?
> I read at
> http://www.debian.org/mirrors/list-non-US.html and I
> conclude it's about software wich is restricted to US
> (i.e. prohibited to export but available from other
> countries)
> B
on Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 08:04:22PM -0700, Juan Pablo ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> It's not clear to me what does Non-US mean?
> I read at
> http://www.debian.org/mirrors/list-non-US.html and I
> conclude it's about software wich is restricted to US (i.e. prohibited
> to export but available from ot
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 08:53, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> To make matters even more fun, I have some older
> messages from this same person in which mutt displays the non-US
> characters properly in all places; his User-Agent headers are
> identical before and after the change, but viewing the raw messa
"Tom Zych" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gary Hennigan wrote:
>
> > You've probably already noticed, but things seem to be back to
> > normal. Typically when something like this happens it's worthwhile
> > looking at some of the mirrors if you're in dire need of something,
> > and otherwise waiti
Gary Hennigan wrote:
> You've probably already noticed, but things seem to be back to
> normal. Typically when something like this happens it's worthwhile
> looking at some of the mirrors if you're in dire need of something,
> and otherwise waiting a day or so to see if the problem persists. Some
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 04:49:18PM +0200, Rudy Gevaert wrote:
> A question about the non-us tree in the mirrors. Are these still up to
> date? The last I heard was that they moved into the normal tree.
Only some packages are moving from non-US to US: those packages which
are DFSG-free and were i
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 21:04:31 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > sylpheed upload... indeed, I think this should've been announced
> > on debian-devel-announce...
>
> Well, I tried bcc'ing it, but the post was rejecte
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> sylpheed upload... indeed, I think this should've been announced
> on debian-devel-announce...
Well, I tried bcc'ing it, but the post was rejected and sent to -devel
instead.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to b
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002 15:30:48 -0300
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Uploads to non-us are not making it to the archive right now. This situation
> is supposed to be over soon. It is related to the crypto-in-main
> transitions. For all I know, it might be over today or next
On Sun, Jan 13, 2002 at 02:13:53AM -0800, Petre Daniel wrote:
> i've been sick a while,and i've read few mails but i ask you again
> ,please,if anyone has on his/hers own server the nonus binary and source
> images,please let me know the address to download them..
> i dont give a damn anymore on
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 10:43:00AM -0800, Michael Montagne wrote:
> I have the following in my sources.list:
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
> deb-src http://http.us.debian.org/debian testing main contrib non-free
>
> But apt couldn't find PostgreSQL. I could
Nikki Locke wrote:
With these lines, an apt-get update returns one error message...
Failed to fetch
http://security.debian.org/dists/stable/updates/main/binary-i386/Packages
Error reading from server Remote end closed connection
I assume the
deb http://security.debian.org/ stable/update
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eric N. Valor wrote:
> I know this doesn't really belong on the security list, but that's where
> this thread started. I thought I'd toss in my $.02 and bring attention to
> a broken deb-src address in out-of-box /etc/apt/sources.list file:
>
> deb-src http://non
Good point. That works nicely - thanks!
At 09:57 PM 7/19/2001 +, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric N. Valor) writes:
> I know this doesn't really belong on the security list, but that's where=20
> this thread started. I thought I'd toss in my $.02 and bring attention to=
I know this doesn't really belong on the security list, but that's where
this thread started. I thought I'd toss in my $.02 and bring attention to
a broken deb-src address in out-of-box /etc/apt/sources.list file:
deb-src http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US
should actually
On Sun, Nov 05, 2000 at 21:02:35 +, Oliver Elphick wrote:
> As far as Debian is concerned, you can do what you like with this
> software. It is up to you to judge whether any item of software is legal
> within your own country.
A useful resource in this regard is the Crypto Law Survey at
http
milenium moon wrote:
>I come from Indonesia. I want ask you about
>licensing/limitation of use from "non-US/main" section
>that include in Debian 2.2 Official CDs. If in my CDs
>contain "non-US/main" section (application/software)
>is legal or ilegal if I instal to my computer (on one
>
milenium moon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mm> I come from Indonesia. I want ask you about
mm> licensing/limitation of use from "non-US/main" section
mm> that include in Debian 2.2 Official CDs. If in my CDs
mm> contain "non-US/main" section (application/software)
mm> is legal or ilegal if I instal
On Mon, 30 Oct 2000, Kevin Krafthefer wrote:
> I am having difficulties installing ssh via dselect. I'm using apt and
> pointing it at http://http.us.debian.org but I can't find all of the
> pieces I want. Could somebody please tell me where to find a list of
> sources for /etc/apt/sources.list (p
Chris, Yes, worked fine with both ftp:// and http:// prefixes. Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 04:22:33PM +0200, Christopher Splinter wrote:
> * Russ Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Failed to fetch
> > ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/non-US/binary-i386/Packages
> > Unable
Russ Pitman wrote:
>
> I get this error running apt-get update
>
> Hit ftp://ftp.de.debian.org potato/non-US/non-free Packages
> Hit ftp://ftp.de.debian.org potato/non-US/non-free Release
> Failed to fetch
> ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/non-US/binary-i386/Packages
> Unabl
* Russ Pitman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Failed to fetch
> ftp://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/potato/non-US/binary-i386/Packages
> Unable to fetch file, server said
> '/debian/dists/potato/non-US/binary-i386/Packages.gz: No such file or
> directory '
I have the following in my /etc/apt/sou
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Konstantin Kivi) wrote:
>ëÁË ÎÁÐÉÓÁÔØ ÓÔÒÏÞËÕ × sources.lst
>ÄÌÑ potato ÐÒÏ non-us?
>ôÁÍ ËÁËÏÅ ÔÏ ÓÅÊÞÁÓ ÎÅÔÒÉ×ÉÁÌØÎÏÅ ÒÁÚÂÉÅÎÉÅ
It would have probably been more useful in English (as that's the
primary language of most of the debian-* lists), but I assume you're
looking for the
On Thu, 20 Jan 2000, Konstantin Kivi wrote:
> ??? ??? ? sources.lst
> ??? potato ??? non-us?
> ??? ? ?? ?? ? ?
deb ftp://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US/main non-US/contrib
non-US/non-free
>
> --
> Sincerely yours, Konstantin Kivi <[EM
> I use that for the german mirror - as you see. I think ftp.debian.org should
> also work.
Nope. ftp.debian.org is in the US.
--
"I already have all the latest software."
-- Laura Winslow, "Family Matters"
Dwayne C. Litzenberger - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Advertising Policy: http://DLitzPower.
I use these lines in sources.list:
deb ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable/non-US main contrib non-free
deb ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US
deb-src ftp://ftp.fr.debian.org/debian-non-US stable non-US
At 07:48 AM 10/23/1999 -0700, Uurcus the Swale wrote:
Hi, can
On Sat, Oct 23, 1999 at 07:48:41AM -0700, Uurcus the Swale wrote:
> Hi, can somebody please tell me exactly what line I need in
> /etc/apt/sources.list to access the non-US archives?
> I need to use FTP not HTTP, and currently I have non-us.debian.org listed
> as the FTP host.
>
maybe you try somet
Thanks guys, works great!
Miguel
Brad wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Nathan E Norman wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Miguel A. Figueroa wrote:
> >
> > [ snip [
> >
> > : deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US main contrib
> > : non-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Miguel A. Figueroa wrote:
>
> [ snip [
>
> : deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US main contrib
> : non-free
>
> deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato non-US/m
On Wed, 6 Oct 1999, Miguel A. Figueroa wrote:
[ snip [
: deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US unstable non-US main contrib
: non-free
deb http://non-us.debian.org/debian-non-US potato non-US/main non-US/contrib
non-US/non-free
Weird, eh?
--
Nathan Norman
MidcoNet 410 South Phillips A
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Marcin Kurc wrote:
: Still not working for me.
:
:
: On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 02:58:53AM -, Pollywog wrote:
: >
: > On 24-Sep-99 Pollywog wrote:
: > >
: > > On 24-Sep-99 Marcin Kurc wrote:
: > >> Since yesterday apt-get cannot connect to non-us.debian.org, how
Still not working for me.
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 02:58:53AM -, Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 24-Sep-99 Pollywog wrote:
> >
> > On 24-Sep-99 Marcin Kurc wrote:
> >> Since yesterday apt-get cannot connect to non-us.debian.org, however I
> >> can ftp there
> >> Anyone knows what's wrong? ( connecti
On 24-Sep-99 Pollywog wrote:
>
> On 24-Sep-99 Marcin Kurc wrote:
>> Since yesterday apt-get cannot connect to non-us.debian.org, however I
>> can ftp there
>> Anyone knows what's wrong? ( connecting from *.edu)
>
> Same here, and NOT connecting from *.edu
It is working for me now, with apt-get
On 24-Sep-99 Marcin Kurc wrote:
> Since yesterday apt-get cannot connect to non-us.debian.org, however I
> can ftp there
> Anyone knows what's wrong? ( connecting from *.edu)
Same here, and NOT connecting from *.edu
--
Andrew
> > What's up? How can I have, at least, a consistent output (I mean, every
> > console app undestanding the keyboard the right way)?
>
> for bash (and all readline programs) create file ~/.inputrc with:
> (...)
Well... I forgot to say that I already had a .inputrc... anyway, I added
three of thos
On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 11:36:24AM -0300, Guilherme Soares Zahn wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I've been facing some curious problems when trying to use
> non-¨us-ascii¨ characters in my Linux box...
>
> In a regular xterm, in the command prompt, an ¨e¨ with an acute
> displays like ¨\351¨, and ¨a
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Since non-us has gone MIA again many people are asking about alternative
> sources..
>
> The kind people at the Univeristy of Toronto have setup a non-us mirror,
> you can access it using these APT sources.list entries
>
> deb http://conan.eecg.toronto.edu/debian-non-US p
Eliezer Figueroa:
> Packeges in non-us means that they are not in english?
It means that the US government would like to keep cryptography out of the
hands of its citizens and the only almost-legal way they have is to pretend
that they are worried about foreign terrorists.
Well, either that or th
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, Richard Harran wrote:
> I think that it is still an export thing: the difference is that the
> international version has weaker encryption, which is not covered by
> the export laws (and is less secure: probably the which ever agency it
> is can crack it).
> However, I'm Engli
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: John Hasler dixit:
: > Horacio writes:
: > > There are some restriction laws on importing and
: > > exporting crypto into/out of the U.S.
: >
: > The US has no laws restricting the importation of crypto.
:
: I believe downloading any of the
Richard Harran writes:
> I think that it is still an export thing: the difference is that the
> international version has weaker encryption, which is not covered by
> the export laws (and is less secure: probably the which ever agency it
> is can crack it).
No. The international version of pgp in
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 12:46:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> export). Thus, so far as PGP is concerned, pgp-us and pgp-i should be the
> same (with the exception of the RSAREF issue, which I'm not sure what it
> means, since the international versions do deal with RSA keys).
I don't know
As Garrick said, the code from PGP was scanned and taken out of the States
in hard print (therefore bypassing the bann on "electronic crypto code"
export). Thus, so far as PGP is concerned, pgp-us and pgp-i should be the
same (with the exception of the RSAREF issue, which I'm not sure what it
mean
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999, J.H.M. Dassen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 21:01:48 +1100, Garrick Chien Welsh wrote:
> > I've never heard anything to suggest it was illegal for anyone in America
> > to use an international version of that software.
>
> Quoting from the description of the "rsaref" packa
On Thu, Feb 11, 1999 at 21:01:48 +1100, Garrick Chien Welsh wrote:
> I've never heard anything to suggest it was illegal for anyone in America
> to use an international version of that software.
Quoting from the description of the "rsaref" package:
: RSAREF is a cryptographic toolkit developed by
I think that it is still an export thing: the difference is that the
international version has weaker encryption, which is not covered by
the export laws (and is less secure: probably the which ever agency it
is can crack it).
However, I'm English, so what would I know?
Rich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
Coming from Australia
On Thu, 11 Feb 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> John Hasler dixit:
> > Horacio writes:
> > > There are some restriction laws on importing and
> > > exporting crypto into/out of the U.S.
> >
> > The US has no laws restricting the importation of crypto.
>
> I believe download
John Hasler dixit:
> Horacio writes:
> > There are some restriction laws on importing and
> > exporting crypto into/out of the U.S.
>
> The US has no laws restricting the importation of crypto.
I believe downloading any of the `international' versions of a crypto based
program is illegal within
Horacio writes:
> There are some restriction laws on importing and
> exporting crypto into/out of the U.S.
The US has no laws restricting the importation of crypto.
--
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Eliezer Figueroa dixit:
> Packeges in non-us means that they are not in english?
I think it means that they cannot be used in the U.S. since they include
some cryptographic code. There are some restriction laws on importing and
exporting crypto into/out of the U.S. (shouldn't this apply to other
Eliezer Figueroa writes:
> Packeges in non-us means that they are not in english?
No. It means the they cannot be distributed from sites in the US for legal
reasons. Non-us contains mostly cryptographic software that it is illegal
to export from the US (yes, I know this makes no sense) and packa
It means that the server is not located in the US, excepting it
from US encryption laws.
-Ian
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Eliezer Figueroa wrote:
> Packeges in non-us means that they are not in english?
>
> __
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 10 Feb 1999, Eliezer Figueroa wrote:
> Packeges in non-us means that they are not in english?
>
No, it means that export restrictions prevent them from being made
available for download from a site in the USA. For example, there are
laws in the US sta
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999, Nathan E Norman wrote:
> Since non-us.debian.org is down, does anyone have recommendations for
> other non-us mirrors easily accessible from the central US? http sites
> preferred but I can live with ftp.
Down? Hmm..
http://www.debian.org/~jgg/Mirrors has my list.
Jason
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hamish Moffatt
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>deb http://www.rising.com.au/debian-non-US
dists/unstable/non-US/binary-$(ARCH)/
I'll try it next time I have to do an update. Thanks.
bye, Georg
--
http://www.westfalen.de/hugo/
On Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 01:32:41PM +, Georg Bauer wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy Edwards
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I get the same thing about several non-existent files in non-us/slink.
> >This was discussed a week or two ago and I had hoped that it'd soon be
> >cl
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy Edwards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get the same thing about several non-existent files in non-us/slink.
>This was discussed a week or two ago and I had hoped that it'd soon be cleared
>up, but it hasn't been.
I currently think that non-us.debian.org is
> Has anyone else had problems with the non US debian slink sites? The
> Packages file seems to contain pgp-us version 2.6.3a-5, but, for at
> least a month now, the pgp-us package itself is version 2.6.3a-4.
I get the same thing about several non-existent files in non-us/slink.
This was discu
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 08/28/98
at 07:18 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Hi,
>am currently helping a friend install 2.0 and we came across something
>I've noted before but bypassed (mainly work in english anyway), ls will
>list non-us-ascii characters as '?' instead of the proper character l
On Fri, Aug 28, 1998 at 07:18:16AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> am currently helping a friend install 2.0 and we came across something
> I've noted before but bypassed (mainly work in english anyway), ls will
> list non-us-ascii characters as '?' instead of the proper character like
> å, ä, or
> "d1temp" == d1temp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
d1temp> am currently helping a friend install 2.0 and we came
d1temp> across something I've noted before but bypassed (mainly
d1temp> work in english anyway), ls will list non-us-ascii
d1temp> characters as '?' instead of the pr
>| So, we're a few hours away from *two* weeks since hamm was officially
>| released as Debian 2.0.
>|
>| **HOWEVER**, nonus.debian.org still has stable pointed to bo and
>| hamm identified as frozen.
>|
>| Any ideas on when this will be updated?
>
>Huh? Where are you looking?
Same server
"Kevin Traas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| So, we're a few hours away from *two* weeks since hamm was officially
| released as Debian 2.0.
|
| **HOWEVER**, nonus.debian.org still has stable pointed to bo and
| hamm identified as frozen.
|
| Any ideas on when this will be updated?
Huh? W
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can't see the non-US directory on sunsite - do they mirrror it?
I don't think they do, but ftp.mcc.ac.uk do :-
ftp://ftp.mcc.ac.uk/pub/linux/distributions/Debian-non-US/>
--
James
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsub
Michael Iles wrote:
> I wanted to install PGP on my system so I searched out
>
> ftp://os.inf.tu-dresden.de
>
> This site has US and international versions of PGP, as well as some other
> neat crypto-stuff (encrypted filesystem, a mail client, etc.).
>
> I tried to point dselect at it though
> I wanted to install PGP on my system so I searched out
>
> ftp://os.inf.tu-dresden.de
Just a thought:
Why don't we create a dns record for this site as ftp.non-us.debian.org ?
Cheers,
- Jim
pgpQiiKBzosU5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
81 matches
Mail list logo
