Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

On 10/11/14 12:50 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: Am 10.11.2014 01:33, schrieb Gary Dale: On 09/11/14 03:30 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: Could you post the contents of your /etc/default/networking? Specifically, it should have either no explicit settings (everything commented out) or the following s

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

Am 10.11.2014 01:33, schrieb Gary Dale: > On 09/11/14 03:30 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: >> Could you post the contents of your /etc/default/networking? >> Specifically, it should have either no explicit settings (everything >> commented out) or the following settings (which are default): >> >> CONF

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

On 09/11/14 03:30 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: Am 09.11.2014 21:13, schrieb Gary Dale: You're right. Here's my default.xml (I only changed the addresses): root@TheLibrarian:/home/garydale# cat /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml default Howeve

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

Am 09.11.2014 21:13, schrieb Gary Dale: > You're right. Here's my default.xml (I only changed the addresses): > > root@TheLibrarian:/home/garydale# cat /etc/libvirt/qemu/networks/default.xml > >default > > > > > > > > > > However when I removed the link t

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

On 09/11/14 02:34 PM, Christian Seiler wrote: Am 09.11.2014 19:48, schrieb Gary Dale: This IP seems oddly familiar... Did you recently install libvirt? Because that's the default IP for libvirt's default internal bridged network (virbr0). Normally, that shouldn't interfere with the standard brid

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

Am 09.11.2014 19:48, schrieb Gary Dale: >> This IP seems oddly familiar... Did you recently install libvirt? >> Because that's the default IP for libvirt's default internal bridged >> network (virbr0). Normally, that shouldn't interfere with the standard >> bridge (different interface name), but ma

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

On 09/11/14 05:09 AM, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote: Hi On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:57:41PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote: For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working properly for many years. My /etc/network/interfaces is: auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface eth0 inet manual auto br0

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

On 09/11/14 05:27 AM, Christian Seiler wrote: Am 08.11.2014 23:57, schrieb Gary Dale: For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working properly for many years. My /etc/network/interfaces is: auto lo iface lo inet loopback iface eth0 inet manual auto br0 iface br0 inet static

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

Am 08.11.2014 23:57, schrieb Gary Dale: > For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working > properly for many years. > > My /etc/network/interfaces is: > > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > iface eth0 inet manual > auto br0 > iface br0 inet static > address 192.168.1.

Re: network card bridging failing on wheezy

Hi On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 05:57:41PM -0500, Gary Dale wrote: > For some reason my network card bridging has failed after working > properly for many years. > > My /etc/network/interfaces is: > > auto lo > iface lo inet loopback > iface eth0 inet manual > auto br0 > iface br0 inet static >

Re: network card

On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 07:51:00AM -0400, chris chalifoux wrote: > hi i was wondering will 512AN_MMWW2 it is a min pci exprress card and i was > wondering will it woork ? > thank you chris Please ask on the debian-user@lists.debian.org list, as copied. -- Jonathan Wiltshire 4096R: 0xD3524C51 /

Re: network card problem

catbugs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And when multiple Debian Developers are to be seen as untrustable, Speaking of "untrustable", you do yourself no favours when you use sock puppets. It's entirely transparent that you are one person posting under several different names; within the past 24 hou

Re: network card problem

On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:34:02 +0200 Erich Schubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [.. half a book deleted that aimed to help Ahmed on the wrong list ..] But smart as cookies like Erich are, the main reason for the posting as follows: > Please ignore the post by Luipher Fhang. This is not even his rea

Re: network card change

Kum Gabor wrote: Hello Everybody! I need a little help with setting up a new network card: I changed mainboard in my computer, and I have new integrated network card, works with forcedeth module, but I don't know how to set up. I tried modprobe forcedeth, but not appears eth0. Can somebody hel

Re: network card change

On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 08:34:31PM +0200, Kum Gabor wrote: > On Saturday 10 May 2008 12:23, thveillon.debian wrote: > > Kum Gabor a ??crit : > > > I need a little help with setting up a new network card: > > > I changed mainboard in my computer, and I have new integrated network > > > card, works w

Re: network card change

On Saturday 10 May 2008 12:23, thveillon.debian wrote: > Kum Gabor a écrit : > > Hello Everybody! > > > > I need a little help with setting up a new network card: > > I changed mainboard in my computer, and I have new integrated network > > card, works with forcedeth module, but I don't know how to

Re: network card change

Kum Gabor a écrit : Hello Everybody! I need a little help with setting up a new network card: I changed mainboard in my computer, and I have new integrated network card, works with forcedeth module, but I don't know how to set up. I tried modprobe forcedeth, but not appears eth0. Can somebody

Re: Network card activation

Oscar Corte wrote: Raj: Thanks a lot for your answer. The recommended documentation helped me to understand many aspects of Linux networking. Now I use “ifdown” and “ifup” commands to activate my network card and went to etc/network/interfaces to change the line: allow-hotplug eth0 for iface

Re: Network card activation

Oscar Corte wrote: Hi all I’m using Debian Etch, and in order to activate my network card y have to go into “Networking” gnome’s option menu, click on eth0, then click on “Deactivate” button and then on “Activate”. I don't get an IP address unless I do this. There should be a configuration whe

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel - SOLUTION

Ken McCord wrote: Hope someone out there can help me with this one, cause I'm stumped. Have an IBM NetVista 6341-64U system (1.0 GHz Celeron, 512 MB RAM, onboard Intel Ethernet adapter) that when Etch boots on it, will detect an installed network card, but when networking is configured to sta

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel

Douglas Allan Tutty wrote: On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 12:32:21PM -0400, Ken McCord wrote: Florian Kulzer wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:08 -0400, Ken McCord wrote: What happens if you eliminate possible /etc/network misconfiguration and try to configure it manu

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel

Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 14.06.07 08:20, Ken McCord wrote: Have an IBM NetVista 6341-64U system (1.0 GHz Celeron, 512 MB RAM, onboard Intel Ethernet adapter) that when Etch boots on it, will detect an installed network card, but when networking is configured to start, will not start

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel

On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 12:32:21PM -0400, Ken McCord wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:08 -0400, Ken McCord wrote: > >>Hope someone out there can help me with this one, cause I'm stumped. > >> > >>Have an IBM NetVista 6341-64U system (1.0 GHz Celeron, 512 MB RAM, > >>

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel

On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 12:32:21 -0400, Ken McCord wrote: > Florian Kulzer wrote: > >On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:08 -0400, Ken McCord wrote: > > > >>Hope someone out there can help me with this one, cause I'm stumped. > >> > >>Have an IBM NetVista 6341-64U system (1.0 GHz Celeron, 512 MB RAM, o

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel

On 14.06.07 08:20, Ken McCord wrote: > Have an IBM NetVista 6341-64U system (1.0 GHz Celeron, 512 MB RAM, > onboard Intel Ethernet adapter) that when Etch boots on it, will detect > an installed network card, but when networking is configured to start, > will not start it. Here's the output of

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel

Florian Kulzer wrote: On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:08 -0400, Ken McCord wrote: Hope someone out there can help me with this one, cause I'm stumped. Have an IBM NetVista 6341-64U system (1.0 GHz Celeron, 512 MB RAM, onboard Intel Ethernet adapter) that when Etch boots on it, will detect an

Re: Network card found but not configured with Etch / 2.6 kernel

On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:08 -0400, Ken McCord wrote: > Hope someone out there can help me with this one, cause I'm stumped. > > Have an IBM NetVista 6341-64U system (1.0 GHz Celeron, 512 MB RAM, onboard > Intel Ethernet adapter) that when Etch boots on it, will detect an > installed network

Re: network card problem

probably mii-tool will tell you something about the card. ifconfig -a reports any nic errors? run tcpdump -n -i to see what hapens. Also, if you are using a hub try to "force" all things attached to the hub to "10mb half" (no autonegotiate). Jon Miller wrote: >Recently I had to replace a mother

IP vs IFCONFIG (was Re: Network card recommendation)

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel L. Miller wrote: My firewall is continuing to run reliably - of course. I have noticed that on of the 3com NICs, I have a single RX overrun reported. Just one - no errors, and no increases in the overrun number. :00:0e.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporati

Re: Network card recommendation

Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel L. Miller wrote: My firewall is continuing to run reliably - of course. I have noticed that on of the 3com NICs, I have a single RX overrun reported. Just one - no errors, and no increases in the overrun number. Which 3

Re: Network card recommendation

On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > My firewall is continuing to run reliably - of course. I have noticed > that on of the 3com NICs, I have a single RX overrun reported. Just one > - no errors, and no increases in the overrun number. Which 3com model exactly? (lspci output, please)

Re: Network card recommendation

Status report: My firewall is continuing to run reliably - of course. I have noticed that on of the 3com NICs, I have a single RX overrun reported. Just one - no errors, and no increases in the overrun number. I used to also have one RX overrun on the other NIC - but not anymore. Hmm

Re: Network card recommendation

Yuri Gorshkov wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel L. Miller wrote: Great! So now some people say Realtek sucks, others say it's better. What's a poor admin to do? Don't flame, just stick with the 3COM and their 3C905... Works well and it's robust (although

Re: Network card recommendation

Le 19 Août 2005 09:17, Yuri Gorshkov a écrit : > P.S. Realtek relly sucks more than a Microsoft vacuum cleaner ever > sucked ;-). Anything would suck more than a MS vacuum cleaner, as a MS vacuum cleaner would be the one and only thing that doesn't suck :-) Nicolas

Re: Network card recommendation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Great! So now some people say Realtek sucks, others say it's better. > What's a poor admin to do? > Don't flame, just stick with the 3COM and their 3C905... Works well and it's robust (although 3COM had some problems with

Re: Network card recommendation

ons, 17,.08.2005 kl. 01.53 -0600, skrev Nate Duehr: > Daniel L. Miller wrote: > > > Great! So now some people say Realtek sucks, others say it's better. > > What's a poor admin to do? > > Buy both and test, like any good engineer. ;-) Realtek -> max 12MB/s 3com -> Max ~50MB/s (Disk don't del

Re: Network card recommendation

Daniel L. Miller wrote: Great! So now some people say Realtek sucks, others say it's better. What's a poor admin to do? Buy both and test, like any good engineer. ;-) Nate -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Network card recommendation

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Thanx - that's a reasonable answer. At the moment then, it sounds like > the 3Com 3c905 or Intel Pro/100 series should be my preferred sources > for 10/100 cards - with SMC as a third place contender. 3COM 3C905C or newer. The 3C905B are so-so. A

Re: Network card recommendation

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:48:30AM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: Great! So now some people say Realtek sucks, others say it's better. What's a poor admin to do? Don't use realtek :-) Well documented and well supported != good performing. Some of the best

Re: Network card recommendation

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 11:48:30AM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Great! So now some people say Realtek sucks, others say it's better. What's > a > poor admin to do? Don't use realtek :-) Well documented and well supported != good performing. Some of the best supported hardware in Linux is

Re: Network card recommendation

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 08:35:40PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote: > Gnu-Raiz wrote: > >Cpu nic usage is a little moot, with dual core chips, > Well, I have seen the following. Pentium-III 1ghz with 3com nic, maxing > the CPU under heavy network (100mbit) load such as copying stuff over > samba/nfs.

Re: Network card recommendation

Sarunas Burdulis wrote: So is the CPU load caused by the copying program (scp, rsync, samba, nfs) or by the driver? How should this be determined? Well, that's hard to say, subjective at least from my perspective, but I find samba and nfs to be fairly low on CPU as compared to scp. On that s

Re: Network card recommendation

Hans du Plooy wrote: > Gnu-Raiz wrote: > >> Cpu nic usage is a little moot, with dual core chips, > > Well, I have seen the following. Pentium-III 1ghz with 3com nic, maxing > the CPU under heavy network (100mbit) load such as copying stuff over > samba/nfs. AthlonXP 2ghz (2400+) with marvel gi

Re: Network card recommendation

Gnu-Raiz wrote: On 01:27, Tue 16 Aug 05, Anders Breindahl wrote: On Monday 15 August 2005 23:48, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:54:40PM +0200, Jan Schledermann wrote: A safe bet is a card with a realtek chip. It works well and is not expensive. Y

Re: Network card recommendation

Rogério Brito wrote: On Aug 16 2005, Hans du Plooy wrote: I'll add my voice for this, the Realtek chips (at least the 100mbit ones) are rubbish. They don't perform well, they're incredibly sensitive to interference, and they have a habit of not lasting long. In the mean time, Jeff G

Re: Network card recommendation

Hans du Plooy wrote: Gnu-Raiz wrote: Cpu nic usage is a little moot, with dual core chips, Well, I have seen the following. Pentium-III 1ghz with 3com nic, maxing the CPU under heavy network (100mbit) load such as copying stuff over samba/nfs. AthlonXP 2ghz (2400+) with marvel gigabit cont

Re: Network card recommendation

Gnu-Raiz wrote: Cpu nic usage is a little moot, with dual core chips, Well, I have seen the following. Pentium-III 1ghz with 3com nic, maxing the CPU under heavy network (100mbit) load such as copying stuff over samba/nfs. AthlonXP 2ghz (2400+) with marvel gigabit controller, copying files to

Re: Network card recommendation

On Aug 16 2005, Hans du Plooy wrote: > I'll add my voice for this, the Realtek chips (at least the 100mbit > ones) are rubbish. They don't perform well, they're incredibly > sensitive to interference, and they have a habit of not lasting long. In the mean time, Jeff Garzik (the maintainer of ma

Re: Network card recommendation

On 01:27, Tue 16 Aug 05, Anders Breindahl wrote: > On Monday 15 August 2005 23:48, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:54:40PM +0200, Jan Schledermann wrote: > > > A safe bet is a card with a realtek chip. It works well and is not > > > expensive. > > > > Yeah. It's safe in th

Re: Network card recommendation

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: Yeah. It's safe in the same way that a Pinto was safe in a rear end collision. Seriously, Realtek are the *cheapest* and *worst* possible chips. If you want anything approaching reliable, then don't get them. If you want something that will not hog your CPU under heav

Re: Network card recommendation - testing

On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Anders Breindahl wrote: > Please educate me: What exactly determines a NIC's reliability? What defines > its effectiveness? use 2 machines for all tests, but use the same nic card in both machines scp machine1:/opt/test/10MB.tgz machine2:/opt/junk try the same te

Re: Network card recommendation

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 04:58:09PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > >Among other things, its load on the CPU when under heavy traffic load. > >Certain cards implement a minimal hardware set and do most of their > >processing in the driver software. The size of the buffe

Re: Network card recommendation

Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:27:21AM +0200, Anders Breindahl wrote: On Monday 15 August 2005 23:48, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:54:40PM +0200, Jan Schledermann wrote: A safe bet is a card with a realtek chip. It works well and is

Re: Network card recommendation

On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 01:27:21AM +0200, Anders Breindahl wrote: > On Monday 15 August 2005 23:48, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:54:40PM +0200, Jan Schledermann wrote: > > > A safe bet is a card with a realtek chip. It works well and is not > > > expensive. > > > > Yeah.

Re: Network card recommendation

On Monday 15 August 2005 23:48, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:54:40PM +0200, Jan Schledermann wrote: > > A safe bet is a card with a realtek chip. It works well and is not > > expensive. > > Yeah. It's safe in the same way that a Pinto was safe in a rear end > collision.

Re: Network card recommendation

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 10:54:40PM +0200, Jan Schledermann wrote: > A safe bet is a card with a realtek chip. It works well and is not > expensive. > Yeah. It's safe in the same way that a Pinto was safe in a rear end collision. Seriously, Realtek are the *cheapest* and *worst* possible chips.

Re: Network card recommendation

man, 15,.08.2005 kl. 13.39 -0700, skrev Daniel L. Miller: > Not to start a war, but . . . > > What's the definitive, must-have, kick-ass, bestest, baddest network > card - that has Linux kernel driver support of course. > > I'd like an answer for both the 100BaseT and 1000BaseT competitions. >

Re: Network card recommendation

Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Not to start a war, but . . . > > What's the definitive, must-have, kick-ass, bestest, baddest network > card - that has Linux kernel driver support of course. > > I'd like an answer for both the 100BaseT and 1000BaseT competitions. > I've tried various Google, searches

Re: Network card recommendation

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel L. Miller wrote: > What's the definitive, must-have, kick-ass, bestest, baddest network > card - that has Linux kernel driver support of course. Always had good results with the Intel cards, the gigabit versions use the e1000 driver: normally

Re: Network card recommendation

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 01:39:14PM -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Not to start a war, but . . . > > What's the definitive, must-have, kick-ass, bestest, baddest network card - > that has Linux kernel driver support of course. > > I'd like an answer for both the 100BaseT and 1000BaseT competiti

Re: Network card woes

On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 17:05 +, Mike Croucher wrote: > Hi > > I am trying to install Debian (The latest stable > release) on a shiny new viglen machine but they seem > to have given me a weird network card. It was not > autodetected by the installer and I cannot find any > info that helps via a

Re: Network Card Support

> I've just found that if I install Debian (Woody) and use the default install > flavour (idepci - I think) - the one you get if you just hit return at the > boot prompt - I do get support for my network card, all works fine. If I use > vanilla, I don't. I have an old network card. > > So, I've got

Re: Network Card Support

Hello Andrew Gilberto (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > I've just found that if I install Debian (Woody) and use the default > install flavour (idepci - I think) - the one you get if you just hit > return at the boot prompt - I do get support for my network card, all > works fine. If I use vanilla,

Re: Network Card

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:15:46 -0500 "Avery, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > HI - > > I have a 3Com EtherLink XL 10/100 PCI TX NIC (3C9058-TX card and I'm not > sure which driver to install for this. All the ones I have tried have > failed. The installer asks for a parameter and I have no id

Re: Network card LED goes off on Booting

On Sun, 2003-09-21 at 09:41, George Abraham wrote: > Hello friends, > I am trying to boot Knoppix on my brother's machine, and when I do so, > the network LED goes off when the kernel starts probing for hardware. > Knoppix boots and I configure networking ( IP is assigned etc ), but > cannot pin

Re: network card speed

On Tuesday 02 September 2003 00:33, Jochen Daum wrote: > I have a Intel based network card in my debian woody webserver. How > can I tell, if it goes 10 MBit or 100 MBit? Have a look at mii-tool from the net-tools package. -- Got Backup? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a s

Re: Network card not detected or listed in installation

On Tue, Jul 29, 2003, ThinKer wrote: > Ok.. I have the disks partitioned and mounted. I am ready to install > the base system, but when I installed the kernel and driver modules, my > network card was not detected. I then went to configure device driver > modules and selected 'net' for Drivers for

Re: Network Card for my Compaq Server

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Fabien Holler wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I have a Compaq Proliant ML 330, with a Compaq NC 3163 Fast Ethernet NIC. I > don't think it's supported by the Debian distribution... So I wanted to www.compaq.com/products/servers/linux/compaq-howto-v8-1.html There is a table there,

Re: Network card drivers on floppy disk

No need to compile unless you really want to. I have that same network card running on my laptop with Debian 3.0 installed. You need to install the pcmcia-cs package. Then you need to play with the options in /etc/pcmcia/network.opts The actual driver is pcnet_cs, but I don't think you'll need

Re: Network card drivers on floppy disk

On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 04:32:54PM -0700, EasyStreet wrote: > I am running Debian 3 on a laptop PC. A Dell > Latitude XPi, Pentium 133. > > This laptop does not have a network card. > > I have this device on a PCMCIA card. What happens when you put it into its slot? (I quickly googled for infor

Re: Network Card error

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 19:56, Alan Poulton wrote: > Hi list > > I'm really new here, so if I left some information out that would help > you help me, please don't hesitate to ask me for the extra info, and > possibly how to obtain it. This is sort of a two part problem. If the > first part has no

Re: Network Card error

No answers to your problems specifically, just some general advice. Try not to compile your ethernet drivers into the kernel statically. It causes headaches when you want to change an ethernet device or fiddle with debug parameters. Compile a whole bunch of useful ones as modules. Then you can load

Re: Network Card error

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 18:56, Alan Poulton wrote: > Hi list > > I'm really new here, so if I left some information out that would help > you help me, please don't hesitate to ask me for the extra info, and > possibly how to obtain it. This is sort of a two part problem. If the > first part has no

Re: Network card -- not found

On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 11:08:12PM -0500, Joshua Foster wrote: | | I cannot get my ethernet card working. During installation, I was | asked for my IP address, netmask, and gateway, which I thought meant | that my card was recognized. But I can't ping anyone but myself. I | looked in the config

Re: Network card problem

Hi Dimi! On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Dimi wrote: > I tried to install the Debian > Woody . The > installation was succesfull. But I cannot install my network card . It > is not in the list where you can choose the network card. And I tried > also som

Re: Network card problem

> My Network Card is a D-Link DFE-550 TX. 8139too? > > I tried to find the driver and I found it several times. Also from the > webpage of D-Link. But they were not comipled . So I compiled them in > Linux and than I wanted to add them in the list (I don't know the > correct technical words for t

Re: Network card newbee

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:08:30PM +, Ben Edwards wrote: | Getting some ware with this one. Have discovered modconf but my card is a | 3com 3c5089-C and cant work out which driver to use. Any idea? I think, like some others, that you have too many digits in that model number. A lot of 3Com

Re: Network card newbee

> Getting some ware with this one. Have discovered modconf but my card > is a 3com 3c5089-C and cant work out which driver to use. Any idea? I'm not sure that 3com 3c5089-C exist. Is it sure? -- Marko Malikovic Strucni suradnik za kompjuterske aplikacije na Odsjeku za psihologiju CARNet siste

Re: Network card newbee

On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:08:30PM +, Ben Edwards wrote: > Getting some ware with this one. Have discovered modconf but my card is a > 3com 3c5089-C and cant work out which driver to use. Any idea? Are you sure its not a 3c589? Sending the output of lspci or cardcl ident for a PCMCIA card t

Re: Network card newbee

Getting some ware with this one. Have discovered modconf but my card is a 3com 3c5089-C and cant work out which driver to use. Any idea? Ben At 14:46 25/01/2002, you wrote: Did nave a look around the web for this but no luck. I have just put a network card in my box but how do I get debian

Re: Network card newbee

On Fri, 25 Jan 2002 14:46:03 + Ben Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did nave a look around the web for this but no luck. I have just put > a network card in my box but how do I get debian to recognize it and > configure it? Find out the brand and model of the network card. If it's a PCI

Re: network card

on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:30:08PM +0800, pb lazatin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > does debain 2.2r4 support this network card?(is this the proper term?) > windows sees it as "CNet PRO200 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter" driver by > "DAVICOM" We're using the same ethernet card on our development server

Re: network card

on Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:30:08PM +0800, pb lazatin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > does debain 2.2r4 support this network card?(is this the proper term?) > > windows sees it as "CNet PRO200 PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter" driver by "DAVICOM" Google is your friend. Mfr. lists the card as GNU/Linux supp

Re: Network Card Modules

Noah Meyerhans wrote: > You need the natsemi module. It is not included with kernel 2.2.x > If you're running kernel 2.4.x, just add support for the National > Semiconductor DP83810" chipset in your kernel config. Thank you - That will do the trick I expect --

Re: Network Card Modules

On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 06:39:30PM +, Keith O'Connell wrote: > Is there anyone out there using the FA311 who can tell me which module I > should be using from a potato distribution? You need the natsemi module. It is not included with kernel 2.2.x, but you can get the source for it (as well a

Re: network card problem

On Tue, 2001-11-13 at 08:34, Richard Weil wrote: > You don't happen to remember the name of the utility > do you? I found a few possible suspects on the 3com > website -- I'm not sure which of them, if any, will do > the job. Thanks. It's the disk with the dos drivers for the 3com 3c509x cards.

Re: network card problem

You don't happen to remember the name of the utility do you? I found a few possible suspects on the 3com website -- I'm not sure which of them, if any, will do the job. Thanks. Richard --- hmike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 19:59, Richard Weil wrote: > > I tried this and sti

Re: network card problem

On Mon, 2001-11-12 at 19:59, Richard Weil wrote: > I tried this and still no progress ... I think the > problem must be from the cards using the same I/O > address. I noticed that on bootup, before the first of > two error messages related to eth1, it says: > > SIOCSIFADDR > > and then before the

Re: network card problem

I tried this and still no progress ... I think the problem must be from the cards using the same I/O address. I noticed that on bootup, before the first of two error messages related to eth1, it says: SIOCSIFADDR and then before the 2nd error: SIOCSIFNETMASK COuld this give an indication to the

Re: network card problem

Hi, Richard I don't know if it could help you but I got the same problem to put my second nic recognized by the kernel 2.2.19. By default, the kernel would only use one nic (eth0) . I said by "default" this means the feature . That was I learned from few month

Re: network card problem

I installed the 3c5x9utils package as suggested and I think it's indicating the problem, but I'm not sure how to interpret the results (or what to do about it). I run the diagnostic and it finds both cards. The output is approx.: Generating the activation sequence on port 0x100 for card 1 Activati

Re: network card problem

On Monday 12 November 2001 10:51 am, Richard Weil wrote: > I just installed a second network card in a machine in > which the first card runs fine. Both cards are old > 3Com 3c509b cards. I added the second card to > /etc/network/interfaces with an address and netmask, > but I can't get the machine

Re: Network card problem

At 11:36 PM 11/4/01 +0100, you wrote: On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 14:32, Raphael Bustin wrote: > As it turns out, the file rtl8139.o exists on my > debian/potato box, in at least one or two places. Which Chip is it? Realtek 8139 or 8129? If you have the 8139 you could/should use the 8139too # drive

Re: Network card problem

Paul Deniston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm trying to install via http w/ a cable modem. My problem is that > I've installed base using floppies but my card (a d-link DFE-530TX+) is > not supported in the drivers disks. My card did come w/ a disk w/ linux > drivers on it, but I have to compil

Re: Network card problem

On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 14:32, Raphael Bustin wrote: > As it turns out, the file rtl8139.o exists on my > debian/potato box, in at least one or two places. Which Chip is it? Realtek 8139 or 8129? If you have the 8139 you could/should use the 8139too # driver for ethernet card with Realtek chipset

Re: Network card problem

At 01:47 PM 11/4/01 -0500, Paul Deniston wrote: RESEND of previous html message: I'm trying to install via http w/ a cable modem. My problem is that I've installed base using floppies but my card (a d-link DFE-530TX+) is not supported in the drivers disks. My card did come w/ a disk w/ linux d

Re: network card detected but module fails

> | > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 03:31:05PM -0700, sucks the bag wrote: > | > | > | > | i'm trying to install debian onto a friend's amd-k7 from the potato > | > | cdroms. his network card says it's a "d-link dfe-530tx", and sure > | > | enough, running "lspci -v" gives: > | > | > | > | [snip non-r

Re: network card detected but module fails

On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 11:00:33PM -0700, sucks the bag wrote: | | thanks for the quick reply. | | > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 03:31:05PM -0700, sucks the bag wrote: | > | | > | i'm trying to install debian onto a friend's amd-k7 from the potato | > | cdroms. his network card says it's a "d-link

Re: network card detected but module fails

thanks for the quick reply. > On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 03:31:05PM -0700, sucks the bag wrote: > | > | i'm trying to install debian onto a friend's amd-k7 from the potato > | cdroms. his network card says it's a "d-link dfe-530tx", and sure > | enough, running "lspci -v" gives: > | > | [snip non

Re: network card detected but module fails

On Sun, Oct 21, 2001 at 03:31:05PM -0700, sucks the bag wrote: | | i'm trying to install debian onto a friend's amd-k7 from the potato | cdroms. his network card says it's a "d-link dfe-530tx", and sure | enough, running "lspci -v" gives: | | [snip non-relevant devices] | | 00:0e.0 Ethernet con

  1   2   >