RE: max RAM size

2001-11-08 Thread François THOMAS
> -Message d'origine- > De : dman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : jeudi 8 novembre 2001 04:35 > À : debian-user@lists.debian.org > Objet : Re: max RAM size > > > On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 08:19:21AM -0800, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: > | > | On Tue

Re: max RAM size

2001-11-07 Thread dman
On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 08:19:21AM -0800, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: | | On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, François THOMAS wrote: | | > Hello list | > | > I have upgraded the physical amount of RAM on a Potato server (r3). | > Unfortunately, it looks like only 960M are managed by the kernel... Is there | > a *saf

Re: max RAM size

2001-11-07 Thread dman
On Tue, Nov 06, 2001 at 05:21:45PM +0100, François THOMAS wrote: | | | > -Message d'origine- | > De : Schnorbus, Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | > Envoyé : mercredi 7 novembre 2001 17:11 | > À : 'François THOMAS' | > Cc : debian-user@lists.debian.org | > Objet : max RAM size | > | > >

RE: max RAM size

2001-11-07 Thread François THOMAS
> -Message d'origine- > De : Schnorbus, Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mercredi 7 novembre 2001 17:11 > À : 'François THOMAS' > Cc : debian-user@lists.debian.org > Objet : max RAM size > > > I have upgraded the physical amount of RAM on a Potato server (r3). > > Unfortunatel

Re: max RAM size

2001-11-07 Thread Jeffrey W. Baker
On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, François THOMAS wrote: > > Hello list > > I have upgraded the physical amount of RAM on a Potato server (r3). > Unfortunately, it looks like only 960M are managed by the kernel... Is there > a *safe* way to make my system manage all the available RAM (=> 2 Gigs) ? > This is a