On 0, David P James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[SNIP!]
> Conclusion: you, the marginal consumer, might be able to stick it to MS
> for $100 or $200, but any concerted attempt to stick it to MS in this
> way is not going to work. MS wins again.
M$ is rumored to have ~$50 billion in cash reserve
Brooks R. Robinson was roused into action on 04/10/02 12:03 and wrote:
> | * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-10-2002 15:14]:
> | > > If I buy an X-Box that cost $300 to make for $200, then MS `loses'
> | > > $100. If I don't buy one at all, then they lose $300.
> | >
> | > Where did you le
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 15:12, Ron Johnson wrote:
[***SNIPPLISED!!!***]
> Thus, stay away from MSFT!! (They do make good optical mice, though...)
>
> --
> ++
> | Ron Johnson, Jr. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> | Jefferson, L
> 2 thoughts:
> - I'm pretty sure that you *must* buy some games that come bundled
> with the Xbox. So, the price is .gt. $200.
> - If "we" buy lots of Xboxen, it will be that much fuel for MSFT
> for when they go to GameCos and say, "Look at our sales figures.
> You should make games for
On Fri, 2002-10-04 at 11:03, Brooks R. Robinson wrote:
> | * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-10-2002 15:14]:
> | > > If I buy an X-Box that cost $300 to make for $200, then MS `loses'
> | > > $100. If I don't buy one at all, then they lose $300.
> | >
> | > Where did you learn economics?
>
| * martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [04-10-2002 15:14]:
| > > If I buy an X-Box that cost $300 to make for $200, then MS `loses'
| > > $100. If I don't buy one at all, then they lose $300.
| >
| > Where did you learn economics?
|
| I should resist, but sorry.
|
| More Xboxes sold, is more deve
6 matches
Mail list logo
