In article
you
write:
>Hello, I am trying to build a kernel for my i386 PC on a amd64 server.
>
>I follow a old instrusion at
>http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/07/msg00926.html . It can build
>the kernel itself correctly, but the problem is script tools such as
>genksyms are build as amd
On 04/17/2013 12:44 PM, 曹思亮 wrote:
> Hello, I am trying to build a kernel for my i386 PC on a amd64 server.
You might also try to build it inside an i386 chroot-environment on your
amd64 server.
> I follow a old instrusion at
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2008/07/msg00926.html . It can bu
Going to try a make-file patch when I get some time.
The patch was offered from a user on the Xen-user mailing list.
[1] http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-09/msg00396.html
-M
> Subject: make-kpkg (from kernel-package) does not build xen
Hi Here it fails again. this is version 12.033 instead of 12.032
I downloaded kernel--package-12.033.tar.gz
invoke like this
CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=3 make-kpkg --initrd --append-to-version dickhead1.0
kernel_image kernel_headers
All done in /usr/src/linux-source-2.6.32. I am running kernel
vmlin
Hi Rob,
>
WARNING: Couldn't open directory
/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/debian/linux-image-/lib/modules/2.6.32-live1.0:
No such file or directory
FATAL: Could not open
/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.26/debian/linux-image-/lib/modules/2.6.32-live1.0/modules.dep.temp
for writing: No such file or directo
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 03:55:22AM -0700, Bill wrote:
> Should there be a include/linux/version.h file in the
> 2.6.25 directory?
if you follow the documentation of kernel-package then make-kpkg will
create it.
If no commands were executed in the 2.6.25 directory tree after creating
it by u
On Thu, 2008-08-05 at 06:44 +0200, NN_il_Confusionario wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:05:37PM -0700, Bill wrote:
> > The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h
> > ""
> > does not match current version:
> > "2.6.25"
> > Please correct this.
>
> > Any pointers here would
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 03:05:37PM -0700, Bill wrote:
> The UTS Release version in include/linux/version.h
> ""
> does not match current version:
> "2.6.25"
> Please correct this.
> Any pointers here would be helpful.
It might be a faq about kernel-package, and its documentation in
/u
Am 2007-03-17 20:11:57, schrieb dranger003:
>
> Indeed it was the debug causing the issue. After disabling all DEBUG lines
> in the .config the kernel is now of the correct size.
:-)
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day
Michelle Konzack
Systemadministrator
Tamay Dogan Network
Debian G
Am 2007-03-06 22:04:59, schrieb Matt Price:
> this? the vmlinuz produced by the package is of normal size, but the
> initrd is huge -- 43 megs! -- and /lib/modules/kernel-version-number/ is
> on the order of 530 megs!!!
Sorry, but with the infos you have provided I can not help you.
Please, c
hi
obviously a half-gig-sized kernel package is not optimal, i'd very much
like to figure out what's going on here... also i should say that the
after the build process, the source directory becomes enormous -- 2.7
gigs with ubuntu's 2.6.20 as opposed to a more restrained 700megs back
in the ol
On 11/27/06, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Matt Price wrote:
> On a mixed sid/ubuntu-edgy system
!!!
> /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 655.
> dh_gencontrol: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
> Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
> /usr/share/perl5/Debi
Matt Price wrote:
> On a mixed sid/ubuntu-edgy system
!!!
> /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 655.
> dh_gencontrol: Compatibility levels before 4 are deprecated.
> Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
> /usr/share/perl5/Debian/Debhelper/Dh_Lib.pm line 655.
> dpkg-gencontrol:
Tommie Van Mechgelen wrote:
Dear,
When I use make-kpkg when loadable module support is disabled, make-kpkg is
generating errors. However compiling it with make works fine.
Here is the error I am getting... Enabling loadable module support makes the
error go away...
I am using kernel-package v
Michelle Konzack([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Am 2006-10-03 17:47:26, schrieb Wayne Topa:
> > Hi all
> >
> > I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> > a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> > these errors:
>
>
Am 2006-10-03 17:47:26, schrieb Wayne Topa:
> Hi all
>
> I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> these errors:
> I have also tried different version of the kernel-package.
> kernel-package
Wayne Topa([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> Hi all
>
> I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> these errors:
>
> VT3 root-3-ETCH:/usr/src/linux-source-2.6.17# make-kpkg --revis
On 10/03/2006 09:35 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
Mumia W..([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
Hi all
I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
these er
Mumia W..([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
> >Hi all
> >
> > I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
> > a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
> > these errors:
> >[...]
>
> Quick
On 10/03/2006 04:47 PM, Wayne Topa wrote:
Hi all
I have been trying to find the answer to this problem on and off for
a month or so. I can't compile a kernel using kpkg without getting
these errors:
[...]
Quick question: did you do a "make-kpkg clean" first?
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Sridhar M.A. wrote:
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:49:19PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Suddenly "make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image" fails with kernel 2.6.18.
> (attached)
>
> That worked OK with 2.6.17 5 days ago.
>
> Anybody do make-kpkg with 2.6.18?
>
Just compi
Hi,
> Anybody do make-kpkg with 2.6.18?
Yep, built a package successfully during that week, as I did with
2.6.17.13 a few days earlier. But it failed when I tried to compile
the thinkpad modules from Sarge for both. (But that looks as if the
thinkpad modules from Sarge are incompatible with newer
On Thu, Sep 21, 2006 at 02:49:19PM -0500, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>
> Suddenly "make-kpkg --revision 1 kernel_image" fails with kernel 2.6.18.
> (attached)
>
> That worked OK with 2.6.17 5 days ago.
>
> Anybody do make-kpkg with 2.6.18?
>
Just compiled 2.6.18 yesterday.
Arthur Marsh wrote:
Hi, when doing a fresh unpack of linux-source-2.6.17 then attempting to
build realtime-lsm, I get the following error:
/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg modules-image
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=2.6.17-10.00.Custom modules-image
echo "The UTS Release version in include/linux
Thanks
I will await 10.037 migrating to testing.
Regards
John
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Talbut wrote:
I am trying to recompile my Kernel using exactly the same steps as I
have used successfully previously.
When I do make-kpkg modules_clean it exits with:
test -d ./debian/stamps || mkdir debian/stamps
exec debian/rules DEBIAN_REVISION=rev.01 modules_clean
The UTS Release ver
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 04:30:12PM +, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:48:34AM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to compile processor-specific kernels for 2 machines, one
> > k7 and one pII. the compilation is difficult for some reason, I'm
> > having to do it
On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 10:48:34AM -0500, Matt Price wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile processor-specific kernels for 2 machines, one
> k7 and one pII. the compilation is difficult for some reason, I'm
> having to do it over and over, and I'm running up against an annoying
> feature of make-
On 12:10 Thu 20 Oct , Ross Boylan wrote:
> I am attempting to recompile a driver (8139too) with one additional
> entry in the pci_device_id table. I may modify it in other ways if
> that doesn't work.
>
> When I try to make-kpkg kernel_image the file is not rebuilt. I tried
> deleting the .o
If fs and ide drivers are compiled into kernel, then initrd is not
necessary.
Using make-kpkg to build a custom kernel-image is quit simple. You can
get more info from debian-reference and man pages.
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 07:10:36PM -0400, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> I'm trying to build a debian kern
On 10/05/2005 11:10 pm, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> I'm trying to build a debian kernel using make-kpkg. It seems simple
> enough, except when I install the newly created kernel package, it
> doesn't create the initrd image. So, when I manually create the
> initrd image with mkinitrd, the boot process
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 07:10:36PM -0400, Jiann-Ming Su wrote:
> I'm trying to build a debian kernel using make-kpkg. It seems simple
> enough, except when I install the newly created kernel package, it
> doesn't create the initrd image. So, when I manually create the
> initrd image with mkinitrd
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 10:08:56PM +1000, Stephen Grant Brown wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> When running
>
> make-kpkg binary
>
> I only get the kernel-image and kernel-headers packages made.
>
> How do I get the other two made?
Not sure. On my system, the binary target produces 4 packages.
>
> Also
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:10:49AM -0500, Matthew J. Harmon wrote:
> Ok, so let me rephrase this question since I think I have the answer, just
> need to find the method.
>
> How can I use make-kpkg to compile my kernel, -WITHOUT- having it try to
> build modules?
>
> The kernel I am building
On (21/12/04 08:22), Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> From: Matt Zagrabelny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Unidentified subject!
> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 08:22:15 -0600
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
> version=3.0.1
>
On (20/12/04 15:30), Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> hello,
> trying to get the hostap modules working:
> # aptitude install hostap-source
> $ make-kpkg --append-to-version=.20041220.0 kernel_image modules_image
> # dpkg -i /usr/src/kernel-image2.6.9.20041220.0_10.00.Cus
On 2004-09-01, Joshua Y. Stabiner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anytime I do a make-kpkg with modules as the target
> (modules_image, modules, modules_config, modules_clean ete.)
> I get the following output (and no .deb file):
>
> for module in ; do \
This line should say:
On Tuesday 31 August 2004 07:55 am, Lance Hoffmeyer wrote:
> How do I configure make-kpkg (kernel-package) so
> that MAKE using the -j3 switch?
>
> The smp.txt says edit the Makefile but the line that the smp.txt
> says to modify does not exist.
>
> The kernel-package man does not really cover this
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:55:57 -0500
Lance Hoffmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How do I configure make-kpkg (kernel-package) so
> that MAKE using the -j3 switch?
>
> The smp.txt says edit the Makefile but the line that the smp.txt
> says to modify does not exist.
>
> The kernel-package man does
On 07-06-2004 18:01, Chris Metzler wrote:
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:27:01 +0200
"Michal R. Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have problem with making debs of kernel modules: i2c and lm-sensors.
I've downloaded sources of lm_sensors 2.8.6 (tar.gz), not the
source.deb, can it be the reason?
I've u
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 12:27:01 +0200
"Michal R. Hoffmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have problem with making debs of kernel modules: i2c and lm-sensors.
> I've downloaded sources of lm_sensors 2.8.6 (tar.gz), not the
> source.deb, can it be the reason?
> I've unpacked sources into /usr/src/mo
On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 10:43:26AM +0200, Michal R. Hoffmann wrote:
> Hello,
Hi. I don't see any answers from people more knowledgeable about
"policy", so I'll give it a try...
>
> after compiling 2.4.26 kernel I'm in trouble upgrading debian/unstable.
> glibc complains about kernel subversion >
Am Dienstag, 11. Mai 2004 09:17 schrieb Michal R. Hoffmann:
> of them has the separate directory. The good practice is to save your
> .config files to all of compiled kernels to keep track of what is in the
> kernel you use, for example:
>
> 2.4.26_1.01.mrh_.config
Or you look in /boot. There is
On 11-05-2004 02:02, Ben Edwards wrote:
Have read a few kernel build howto amd was wondering is there anything
wrong with just using EXTRAVERSION rather than -revision. It seems
better as you can tell whitch kernel you are using from uname -a. I'me
a bit parinoid and after I install a new ke
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 11:18:51AM -0400, Roberto Sanchez wrote:
|>is there any way to pass a config param through the command line,
|>that would apply dependencies ? (ie k7->3dnow, L1cacheshift=6)
|>
|>thanks
|>
|>
|
|How about just building a generic i386 kernel? It would save you
|lots of
xavier wrote:
Hi,
I'm using make-kpkg to build kernels.
I need the same kernel on differents hosts.
(p3,p4,k7...)
Now i'm builing the kernel, i do a make xconfig/menuconfig
to change the cpu, and i'm rebuilding.
Is there a way to build all thoses kernels non-interactively ?
I could do some sed o
> From: Steve Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: Debian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: make-kpkg problem
> > Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:15:29 -0600 (CST)
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PRO
ian User List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: make-kpkg problem
> Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 15:15:29 -0600 (CST)
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ritesh,
>
> Edit your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file and add the following:
>
> do_clean:=No
>
> Stev
Ritesh,
Edit your /etc/kernel-pkg.conf file and add the following:
do_clean:=No
Steve
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 01:16:50AM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Hello all,
> One generic problem. I use make-kpkg to recompile kernels and get my kernel
> images in .deb . Now everytime the ker
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 23:19, Jonathan Brandmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 23:51, matt zagrabelny wrote:
> > hello,
> >
> > ive just make a kernel package and nvidia module package via
> >
> > $ fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version kernel_image modules
> >
> > i get an error afterwords:
>
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 23:51, matt zagrabelny wrote:
> hello,
>
> ive just make a kernel package and nvidia module package via
>
> $ fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version kernel_image modules
>
> i get an error afterwords:
>
> Could not find a signing program (pgp or gpg)!
>
> i do have gpg in
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 05:57:53PM -0600, Croy, Nathan wrote:
> SUMMARY: during make-kpkg, why do i get a make error with dummy_do_dep?
>
> FULL:
> I'm trying to create a kernel package "The Debian Way". Following
> directions from the Debian Reference Manual section 7.1.1
> http://www.debian.org
on Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 11:14:23AM +0800, Isaac To ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> And I don't consider Grub to be much less documented than LILO.
See the man vs. info debate rehash here last week.
That said, I use GRUB on my boxen.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://km
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Richard Pearce wrote:
> Hi I've been trying to recompile my kernel however the list of modules coming out is
> incomplete..
>
> What i've been doing..
>
> First off I got kernel-source.2.4.20 ..
> then i did make menuconfig and decided on the stuff i want in the kernel..
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:00:38 +, Richard Pearce wrote:
> Hi I've been trying to recompile my kernel however the list of modules coming out is
> incomplete..
>
> What i've been doing..
>
> First off I got kernel-source.2.4.20 ..
> then i did make menuconfig and decided on the stuff i want in
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 05:35:29PM -, Richard Pearce wrote:
> Hi I've been trying to recompile my kernel however the list of modules coming out is
> incomplete..
>
> What i've been doing..
>
> First off I got kernel-source.2.4.20 ..
> then i did make menuconfig and decided on the stuff i wa
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I am trying to apply kernel patches with make-kpkg, but am running into
> difficulties, particularly on repeated runs.
[...]
> START applying patch "Debian Logo"
[...]
There was a discussion regarding the kernel-debian-logo-patch before. Here
is what I
After reading the fine source I can now answer some, but not all, of my
questions. I understand more about why it's failing, but don't know how
to make it work right or diagnose the failures (well, I probably could
diagnose them by untarring the patch file and comparing it to the
target, though th
On Tuesday December 9 at 06:42pm
Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:09:48AM -0800, Michael Montagne wrote:
> > I use Grub as a bootloader. After making a kernel .deb using
> > make-kpkg, I'm running dpkg -i Near the end you are asked to if
> > you want to m
> "Paul" == Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I use Grub as a bootloader. After making a kernel .deb using
>> make-kpkg, I'm running dpkg -i Near the end you are asked to if
>> you want to make a boot block. What is this? Is it just an entry in
>> Grub or LILO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 10:09:48AM -0800, Michael Montagne wrote:
> I use Grub as a bootloader. After making a kernel .deb using
> make-kpkg, I'm running dpkg -i Near the end you are asked to if
> you want to make a boot block. What is this? Is
Michael Montagne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I use Grub as a bootloader. After making a kernel .deb using
> make-kpkg, I'm running dpkg -i Near the end you are asked to if
> you want to make a boot block. What is this? Is it just an entry in
> Grub or LILO? What I'm most concerned about
Michael Montagne wrote:
I use Grub as a bootloader. After making a kernel .deb using
make-kpkg, I'm running dpkg -i Near the end you are asked to if
you want to make a boot block. What is this? Is it just an entry in
Grub or LILO? What I'm most concerned about is being able to boot to
my o
On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 06:29:19PM +0200, [loonyx | rolf joho] said
> Robert William Hutton wrote:
> >
> >When you copy a config file from elsewhere, it's a good idea to do a
> >"make oldconfig". oldconfig asks you about any drivers/options that
> >didn't exist in the previous version.
> >
>
>
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 18:29:19 +0200,
"[loonyx | rolf joho]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Robert William Hutton wrote:
> >
> > When you copy a config file from elsewhere, it's a good idea to do a
> >
> > "make oldconfig". oldconfig asks you about any drivers/optio
Robert William Hutton wrote:
When you copy a config file from elsewhere, it's a good idea to do a
"make oldconfig". oldconfig asks you about any drivers/options that
didn't exist in the previous version.
while i know that this is the way to go when upgrading to newer
kernel-versions, is also s
Abdul Latip wrote:
This is NOT urgent, since Debian provides working kernels.
However, I am just wondering on where to find clues on how to solve
problems while compiling the kernels. I tried google with not much
luck.
The problem is, whenever I recompile a newer kernel using "make-kpkg";
most like
Hi there,
--On Thursday, October 23, 2003 06:54:45 AM -0400 Abdul Latip
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is NOT urgent, since Debian provides working kernels.
However, I am just wondering on where to find clues on how to solve
problems while compiling the kernels. I tried google with not much
luc
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 12:56:09 +0300
Alphonse Ogulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fatal: Kernel /boot/vmlinux is too big
>
> compiled kernel as follows:-
> atlas:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg --initrd clean kernel_image
> and also tried
> atlas:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean binary
>
> Where could I
* Alphonse Ogulla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030826 11:56]:
> compiled kernel as follows:-
> atlas:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg --initrd clean kernel_image
> and also tried
> atlas:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean binary
>
> Where could I be going wrong?
Your could try to use the -bzimage parameter of mak
On Sat, 23 Aug 2003 01:39:27 +0100
Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 08:10:31PM -0400, Antonio Rodr wrote:
> > Along these years I have built many kernel images using the great
> > kernel package. But today, using a fresh testing installation, with
> > kernel-source
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 08:10:31PM -0400, Antonio Rodr wrote:
> Along these years I have built many kernel images using the great
> kernel package. But today, using a fresh testing installation, with
> kernel-source 2.4.21 the last step is giving me errors.
I think you're going to need to give mor
* Antonio Rodr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030823 02:10]:
> Along these years I have built many kernel images using the great
> kernel package. But today, using a fresh testing installation, with
> kernel-source 2.4.21 the last step is giving me errors.
That's bad.
Yours sincerely
Alexander
PS: Wh
> The interfaces have also changed, meaning that the nvidia driver you got from
> nvidia will not work with newer kernels without some hacking. Just google
> around and check nvnews.com, as there are plenty of kernel hackers out there
> on the bleeding edge that have gotten theirs to work and then
> fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version=.20030812 kernel_image
>
> Which is (for the 2.6 try):
>
> lots and lots of output..
> .
> and finally
>
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/src/kernel-source-2.6.0-test2'
> echo done > stamp-build
> /usr/bin/make -f /usr
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 17:37:19 +0800 (CST)
"Pete Trachy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried compiling the 2.4.21 and available 2.6
> kernels using the debian source packages. I have been
> following the instructions on the newbie doc
> (http://newbiedoc.sourceforge.net/system/kernel-pkg.html
J. Zidar wrote:
> kompi:/usr/src/linux# make-kpkg clean
> Permission denied.
> [...]
> Any idea?
Are you sure you are on your local disk? This looks just like
/usr/src or /usr/src/linux is a symlink to an NFS mounted filesystem
and you are root which has no permission there.
BTW I never build ke
Bret Comstock Waldow wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 17:54, Wayne Gemmell wrote:
Is there an equivalent for this package with a menu interface like make
menuconfig in normal kernel compilations? It is so much quicker...
You do the 'make menuconfig' step before you compile with make-kpkg, as
you w
On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 17:54, Wayne Gemmell wrote:
> Is there an equivalent for this package with a menu interface like make
> menuconfig in normal kernel compilations? It is so much quicker...
You do the 'make menuconfig' step before you compile with make-kpkg, as
you would with any other kernel
--- Engosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>
> Yes, I've got the same errors as you, but no with the 2.6.0-test3 kernel.
> Another problem I have is that with the 2.6 kernel I'm not able to make
> kernel-nvidia module. And have somebody tried to execute modprobe with the
> 2.6 kernel, 'cause I get
Hi,
* Wayne Gemmell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [030806 09:44]:
> Hi, I'm trying to make my own kernel useing make-kpkg to solve my earlier
> problems with DMA etc. When I start the first processor family gets answered
> for me as i386.
I believe this is the default in the .config for the kernel sourc
Bill Moseley wrote:
> $ fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 --append_to_version=-xfs-athlon
> kernel_image
> $ fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.1.0 --append_to_version=-xfs-athlon
> modules_image
>
> Now, when I want to run clean:
> $ make-kpkg clean modules_clean
> I get:
> The
On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 16:50, Benedict Verheyen wrote:
> You can also use patch -p1 path_to_path in the /usr/src/linux directory
> to apply the patch and then use steps 5 & 6.
> That's what i did to apply the debian-logo patch. It also didn't work
> when using the --added-patches switch so i had to
Op do 24-07-2003, om 16:58 schreef Mark C:
> I have now managed to solve it, it seems a bit weird way, but it works,
> and I've tried it around 6 times now
> (after each time rm -rf kernel-source-2.4.18).
>
> 1. extract kernel-source
> 2. copy over .config to kernel-source top level directory
> 3.
I have now managed to solve it, it seems a bit weird way, but it works,
and I've tried it around 6 times now
(after each time rm -rf kernel-source-2.4.18).
1. extract kernel-source
2. copy over .config to kernel-source top level directory
3. make-kpkg --added-patches=grsecurity_2_4
4. hit CTRL-C a
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.11.0457 +0200]:
> See? Each lndir directory only has files that were patched, or
> object files; and the ../linux-2.4.20 is pristine, ready to be
> patched up to 2.4.21.
I see this, yes. I used to do it exactly the same way, with
ha
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 09:31:28 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> i hope you don't mind me asking a question... also sprach Manoj
> Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.06.0223 +0200]:
>> % sudo echo 'debian := 5:501c' >> /etc/kernel-pkg.conf
> what does this line do?
I
003 6:04 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: make-kpkg producing error
>
>
> The thought never even occurred to me that my version of GCC was too
> high.
> I guess 3.3 has been moved to the testing tree without me paying
> attention...
>
> The compile hasn't f
hanks!
<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->
Jason R DePriest
EA DATA. SF
<-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><-><->
> -----Original Message-
> From: Jamin W. Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:48:40PM -0500, DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
[ several compilation errors... ]
>
> I've wiped out the entire directory and re-extracted the files three
> times and the error always comes back.
> The kernel-source-2.4.18.tar.bz2 file is from the official Debian source
> site
i hope you don't mind me asking a question...
also sprach Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.06.0223 +0200]:
> % sudo echo 'debian := 5:501c' >> /etc/kernel-pkg.conf
what does this line do?
the reason why i don't like your approach, although i really
appreciate you showing it to me, i
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 18:25:15 -0400, Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0500
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > So I am wondering: what am I doing wrong? I *should* be able to
>> > compile modules for an existing kernel tree without write privs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:45:58AM -0300, Ricardo BUG!Herrmann wrote:
> Why does make-kpkg fully recompiles the kernel every time ? I wanted to
> add some modules only and it seems a "clean" target was run first. Is
> there a way to disable this ?
You
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:45:58AM -0300, Ricardo BUG!Herrmann wrote:
> Why does make-kpkg fully recompiles the kernel every time ? I wanted to
> add some modules only and it seems a "clean" target was run first. Is
> there a way to disable this ?
Yep, put 'do_clean := NO' in the ~/.kernel-pkg.con
On Wed, 02 Jul 2003 21:20:21 +0200, Ricardo BUG!Herrmann wrote:
> I wanted to add support for some more modules in an already built kernel
> tree. Then when I ran make_kpkg kernel_image a full recompile started
> ... is there a way out ?
It shouldn't do, unless you tell it to. How do you invoke m
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 11:45:58AM -0300, Ricardo BUG!Herrmann wrote:
> Why does make-kpkg fully recompiles the kernel every time ? I wanted to
> add some modules only and it seems a "clean" target was run first. Is
> there a way to disable this ?
It depends on which targets you are building... If
also sprach martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.07.01.0006 +0200]:
> I still don't understand why that would solve the problem.
I am giving up. I thought it would be nice if make-kpkg could do
some magic to be able to compile modules from /usr/src/modules even
if /usr is read-only. Like some
On Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:43:01 -0500
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I am wondering: what am I doing wrong? I *should* be able to
> > compile modules for an existing kernel tree without write privs to
> > /usr/src/modules/..., right?
>
>
> Right.
>
> What is MODULE_
On Monday 30 June 2003 05:06 pm, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Kevin McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.30.1548
+0200]:
> > When you do "fakeroot make-kpkg ..." make-kpkg itself runs under
> > fakeroot, so a root environment is provided whenever necessary,
> > instead of "as expected" by
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 22:17:58 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> also sprach David Z Maze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003.06.30.2141 +0200]:
>> > cp: cannot create regular file
>> > `/usr/src/modules/nvidia/debian/control': Permission denied
>>
>> Right: with the default setup, the u
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
