Re: Make Debian automount mount devices in read only

Hi, I'm providing more information and answering my own question (for my laptop's installation). On Mar/03/2022, David Wright wrote: > On Thu 03 Mar 2022 at 10:00:09 (+0100), Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > > > My desktop computer (Debian 11.2) auto-mounts USB devices (hard disks, > > etc.) >

Re: Make Debian automount mount devices in read only

On Thu 03 Mar 2022 at 10:00:09 (+0100), Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > My desktop computer (Debian 11.2) auto-mounts USB devices (hard disks, > etc.) That doesn't help a great deal because there are several automounters available in Debian. > I would like the devices to be mounted in read only

Re: Make Debian automount mount devices in read only

Hi, On Mar/03/2022, Brian wrote: > On Thu 03 Mar 2022 at 10:00:09 +0100, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > My desktop computer (Debian 11.2) auto-mounts USB devices (hard disks, > > etc.) > > > > I would like the devices to be mounted in read only mode by default. I > > will

Re: Make Debian automount mount devices in read only

On Thu 03 Mar 2022 at 10:00:09 +0100, Carles Pina i Estany wrote: > > Hi, > > My desktop computer (Debian 11.2) auto-mounts USB devices (hard disks, > etc.) > > I would like the devices to be mounted in read only mode by default. I > will remount them in rw if I need to. > > They are not in my

Re: Make wider selectable edge in Mate windows

songbird wrote: i should have also mentioned mate-tweak which i've had installed for a long time too. songbird

Re: Make wider selectable edge in Mate windows

On 9/19/21 5:31 AM, songbird wrote: Dedeco Balaco wrote: ... My theme is a personalized one. I can give information about it, Jeremy. Just tell me what and how. i've been running MATE via testing for a long time now (and also keep a spare stable partition for booting in case of trouble) an

Re: Make wider selectable edge in Mate windows

Dedeco Balaco wrote: ... > My theme is a personalized one. I can give information about it, Jeremy. > Just tell me what and how. i've been running MATE via testing for a long time now (and also keep a spare stable partition for booting in case of trouble) and i've not noticed any problem with th

Re: Make wider selectable edge in Mate windows

On Sun 19 Sep 2021 at 10:22:24 (+0800), Jeremy Ardley wrote: > On 19/9/21 9:55 am, Dedeco Balaco wrote: > > Em 18/09/2021 22:42, Jeremy Ardley escreveu: > > > I'm running Mate on Debian 10. > > > > > > The problem is that the width of the window edge that you pull to change > > > the size of a win

Re: Make wider selectable edge in Mate windows

On 19/9/21 9:55 am, Dedeco Balaco wrote: Em 18/09/2021 22:42, Jeremy Ardley escreveu: I'm running Mate on Debian 10. The problem is that the width of the window edge that you pull to change the size of a window seems to be only 1 pixel wide. I've heard of this problem in gnome along with som

Re: make custom kernel

On 2021-07-04 18:21, Brian wrote: Definitely. Has gparted been mentioned? The rest of the disk is LVM. Would I need to shrink that first before gparted ? mick -- Key ID4BFEBB31

Re: make custom kernel

On Sun 04 Jul 2021 at 10:26:26 -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Sat 03 Jul 2021 at 19:53:03 (+0100), mick crane wrote: > > I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. > > What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? > > Install linux headers > > change to a "build" directory > > make

Re: make custom kernel

On 2021-07-04 16:26, David Wright wrote: On Sat 03 Jul 2021 at 19:53:03 (+0100), mick crane wrote: I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? Install linux headers change to a "build" directory make menu-config ./configure make make dep

Re: make custom kernel

On Sat 03 Jul 2021 at 19:53:03 (+0100), mick crane wrote: > I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. > What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? > Install linux headers > change to a "build" directory > make menu-config > ./configure > make > make dep > make install > make clean

Re: make custom kernel

mlnl wrote: > 10. make deb-pkg LOCALVERSION=-nameN KDEB_PKGVERSION=$(make > kernelversion)-1 (nameN e. g. v1) I prefer bindeb-dpkg saves some overhead in zipping the source

Re: make custom kernel

On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 1:26 PM The Wanderer wrote: > On 2021-07-04 at 06:26, IL Ka wrote: > > >> thank you very much. Can I somehow load the current configuration > >> so menuconfig shows what choices were made for current kernel ? > > > > zcat /proc/config.gz > .config > > AFAIK, Debian hasn't s

Re: make custom kernel

On 2021-07-04 at 06:26, IL Ka wrote: >> thank you very much. Can I somehow load the current configuration >> so menuconfig shows what choices were made for current kernel ? > > zcat /proc/config.gz > .config AFAIK, Debian hasn't shipped kernels with /proc/config.gz enabled for quite a few years

Re: make custom kernel

> > thank you very much. Can I somehow load the current configuration so > menuconfig shows what choices were made for current kernel ? > > zcat /proc/config.gz > .config

Re: make custom kernel

Hi, On 2021-07-04 2:42 a.m., mick crane wrote: > On 2021-07-04 06:22, mlnl wrote: >> Hi Mick, >> >> mick crane wrote: >> >>> I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. >>> What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? >> >> Do you mean a custom Debian or a vanilla kernel from kerne

Re: make custom kernel

On 2021-07-04 06:22, mlnl wrote: Hi Mick, mick crane wrote: I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? Do you mean a custom Debian or a vanilla kernel from kernel.org? For a Debian kernel you can look at

Re: make custom kernel

Hi Mick, mick crane wrote: >I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. >What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? Do you mean a custom Debian or a vanilla kernel from kernel.org? For a Debian kernel you can look at For a

Re: make custom kernel

On Sun, Jul 4, 2021 at 12:20 AM Anssi Saari wrote: > mick crane writes: > > > I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. > > What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? > > I assume there are full instructions somewhere. Here it is http://www.kroah.com/lkn/ ``make help`` in ke

Re: make custom kernel

mick crane writes: > I've done it before but I've forgotten and the order. > What's the procedure for making a custom kernel? > Install linux headers > change to a "build" directory > make menu-config > ./configure > make > make dep > make install > make clean I assume there are full instruction

Re: make a drawing

Thanks for all suggestions, I think I'll do it with SVG manually from Emacs... -- underground experts united http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573 https://dataswamp.org/~incal

Re: make a drawing

Emanuel Berg wrote: > Thanks for all suggestions, I think I'll do it with > SVG manually from Emacs... Last time I asked myself a similar question I came to the conclusion that most of the software in linux is BS. There are however two sides here - the technical and the representational. I was l

Re: make a drawing

On 31-08-2020 13:06, Emanuel Berg wrote: > Hello everyone, > > the project I'm currently working on is a tree house. > It has two floors and then several extension > platforms which are reachable by ropes. Here are some > photos [1] - the "new-deck" was completed only one > week ago or something :

Re: make a drawing

Emanuel Berg (12020-08-31): > the project I'm currently working on is a tree house. > It has two floors and then several extension > platforms which are reachable by ropes. Here are some > photos [1] - the "new-deck" was completed only one > week ago or something :) > > Anyway, I'd like to make a

Re: make a drawing

On 8/30/20 11:51 PM, Russell L. Harris wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:06:20AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote: Anyway, I'd like to make a drawing of it. Any idea what software might be used? sweethome inkscape dia There are a number of Linux-usable CAD programs, but the one I thought was the

Re: make a drawing

On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 05:06:20AM +0200, Emanuel Berg wrote: Anyway, I'd like to make a drawing of it. Any idea what software might be used? sweethome inkscape dia

Re: make apt show packages in column

On 2020-05-17, Ihor Antonov wrote: > > Hi > > when installing a package with multiple dependencies apt gives an output: > (example: apt install gnome) > >> The following NEW packages will be installed: >> >> accountsservice aisleriot apache2-bin apg baobab bluez bluez-obexd >> bogofilter ogofil

Re: make apt show packages in column

On 17/5/20 4:30 pm, Frank wrote: when installing a package with multiple dependencies apt gives an output: (example: apt install gnome) apt list --upgradable gives me (shortened) qemu-system-x86/testing 1:5.0-4 amd64 [upgradable from: 1:4.2-7] qemu-utils/testing 1:5.0-4 amd64 [upgradable fr

Re: make apt show packages in column

Op 17-05-2020 om 02:39 schreef Ihor Antonov: Hi when installing a package with multiple dependencies apt gives an output: (example: apt install gnome) The following NEW packages will be installed: accountsservice aisleriot apache2-bin apg baobab bluez bluez-obexd bogofilter ogofilter-bdb

Re: make apt show packages in column

On Sb, 16 mai 20, 20:14:15, David Wright wrote: > On Sat 16 May 2020 at 17:39:14 (-0700), Ihor Antonov wrote: > > > > It is very inconvenient to inspect the list of installed packages in > > such output. Is it possible to make apt output this in a column? > > You could use the dry run as in the

Re: make apt show packages in column

On Sat 16 May 2020 at 17:39:14 (-0700), Ihor Antonov wrote: > > when installing a package with multiple dependencies apt gives an output: > (example: apt install gnome) > > > The following NEW packages will be installed: > > > > accountsservice aisleriot apache2-bin apg baobab bluez bluez-obexd

Re: make apt show packages in column

On 2020-05-16 at 20:39, Ihor Antonov wrote: > Hi > > when installing a package with multiple dependencies apt gives an output: > (example: apt install gnome) > >> The following NEW packages will be installed: >> >> accountsservice aisleriot apache2-bin apg baobab bluez bluez-obexd >> bogofilt

Re: make check nested variables

Hi Thomas, Greg, Steve & Reco, sorry for the late reply, but thank you all for the hints! :) > Or skip the test by setting variable > am_cv_make_support_nested_variables to "yes" before running > configure: > > export am_cv_make_support_nested_variables=yes ./configure > > If skipping the tes

Re: make check nested variables

On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 07:29:57PM +0200, Thomas Schmitt wrote: > ps -ef | fgrep make > will list any process with string "make" in its command line. > (So this search run should find at least itself.) (Sometimes. It's a classic race condition.)

Re: make check nested variables

Hi, more ideas would be: Add option -d to the "make" command in ./configure. Or skip the test by setting variable am_cv_make_support_nested_variables to "yes" before running configure: export am_cv_make_support_nested_variables=yes ./configure If skipping the test does reliably help, then

Re: make check nested variables

Hi. On Sat, Oct 27, 2018 at 06:24:51PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote: > mlnl wrote: > >Hi, > > > >when i compile something in a tmux or rxvt window, sometimes i get: > > > >$ ./configure > >checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c > >checking whether build environment is

Re: make check nested variables

mlnl wrote: >Hi, > >when i compile something in a tmux or rxvt window, sometimes i get: > >$ ./configure >checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c >checking whether build environment is sane... yes >checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p >checking for gawk... gawk

Re: make check nested variables

Hi, mlnl wrote: > I meant Alt+Fn or logout and doing it in the console - there it works, > sorry. And i have observed in tmux and rxvt window (on KDE), sometimes > it works too on a second try, yes. So it never fails on the console but sometimes fails two times in a row on your terminal windows ?

Re: make check nested variables

Hi, mlnl wrote: > when i compile something in a tmux or rxvt window, sometimes i get: > $ ./configure > [...] > checking whether make supports nested variables... > and than it hangs. Then i have to go in a terminal, where it works. What particular terminal program does work ? The last visible m

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On Sat 16 Sep 2017 at 19:45:50 (+1000), Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 15.09.17 08:48, Peter Smith wrote: > > P.S.: I actually was able to change the keyboard layout later on by > > the Gnome Tweak tool, but nevertheless I do not unterstand why the > > official information does not work and it shoul

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On 15.09.17 08:48, Peter Smith wrote: > P.S.: I actually was able to change the keyboard layout later on by > the Gnome Tweak tool, but nevertheless I do not unterstand why the > official information does not work and it should be rectified. It is depressing to see the linux community succumb to u

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On 2017-09-15 10:03, Steve McIntyre wrote: Peter Smith wrote: --> Yes, I have already done that. Nevertheless the documentation on that Wiki page is wrong. I'd like to report a bug or something like this but the Wiki page does not provide any clues on how to do that. I don't want anybody else t

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

Peter Smith wrote: > >--> Yes, I have already done that. Nevertheless the documentation on >that Wiki page is wrong. I'd like to report a bug or something like >this but the Wiki page does not provide any clues on how to do that. >I don't want anybody else to waste his/her time by reading and >foll

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:08:26AM +0200, Dejan Jocic wrote: > On 15-09-17, Peter Smith wrote: > > --> Yes, I have already done that. Nevertheless the documentation on > > that Wiki page is wrong. I'd like to report a bug or something like > > this but the Wiki page does not provide any clues on ho

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 08:48:21AM +0200, Peter Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I have tried to change the behavior of the CapsLock key to make it an > additional Escape key. In order to do this I read the advice on > https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard > > Specifically I did: > I changed the file /etc/defau

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 10:09:27AM +0200, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote: [...] > I did it by xmodmap, just to different key than escape: Perhaps the problem is an interaction with the original poster's desktop environment (it is Gnome, iirc). Desktop e

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On Fri, 15 Sep 2017 08:48:21 +0200, Peter Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I have tried to change the behavior of the CapsLock key to make it an > additional Escape key. In order to do this I read the advice on > https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard > > Specifically I did: > I changed the file /etc/default/

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On 15-09-17, Peter Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have tried to change the behavior of the CapsLock key to make it an > > additional Escape key. In order to do this I read the advice on > > https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard > > > > Specifically I did: > > I changed the file /etc/default/keyboard to:

Re: Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

> Hi, > > I have tried to change the behavior of the CapsLock key to make it an > additional Escape key. In order to do this I read the advice on > https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard > > Specifically I did: > I changed the file /etc/default/keyboard to: > > XKBLAYOUT="us,at" > XKBVARIANT="," > BACKSP

Re: Make CapsLock an additional Escape key - Problem: https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard advice does not work

On 15-09-17, Peter Smith wrote: > Hi, > > I have tried to change the behavior of the CapsLock key to make it an > additional Escape key. In order to do this I read the advice on > https://wiki.debian.org/Keyboard > > Specifically I did: > I changed the file /etc/default/keyboard to: > > XKBLAYOU

Re: make cannot find file

> Danny wrote: > > I found the slippery file ... ;) > > Thank you Thomas > > You owe my curiosity some details. What file was slippery in what way ? > How did you repair the situation ? > After installing EVERYTHING (lol) that has some resemblance to "asm/socket.h" (including the ones you sugges

Re: make cannot find file

Hi, (i Cc: Danny because i don't know whether he already unsubscribed) Danny wrote: > I found the slippery file ... ;) > Thank you Thomas You owe my curiosity some details. What file was slippery in what way ? How did you repair the situation ? Have a nice day :) Thomas

Re: make cannot find file

I found the slippery file ... ;) > On my system it is > /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/socket.h > which includes > > Thomas Thank you Thomas Have a nice day Day

Re: make cannot find file

On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 09:33:44AM +0200, Danny wrote: > Hi guys, > > I am having trouble with make. It complains about a missing header file > "asm/socket.h". > > I did a search for each package that contains this file and installed them but > the error still persists. What is your full path to

Re: make cannot find file

Hi, Danny wrote: > In file included from /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/sys/socket.h:38:0, > from /root/git/svxlink/src/async/core/AsyncIpAddress.cpp:40: > /usr/include/i386-linux-gnu/bits/socket.h:345:24: fatal error: asm/socket.h: > No such file or directory Is there a file /us

Re: make cannot find file

: *** [all] Error 2 On Jul 05 16, Alberto Luaces : > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2016 09:41:56 +0200 > From: Alberto Luaces > Subject: Re: make cannot find file >

Re: make cannot find file

Danny writes: > Hi guys, > > I am having trouble with make. It complains about a missing header file > "asm/socket.h". > > I did a search for each package that contains this file and installed them but > the error still persists. > >

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:44:52PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > [...] see bug #770492. Truly amazing! For "ping", it would be like this: $ /sbin/getcap /bin/ping /bin/ping = cap_net_raw+ep $ chown root:root /bin/ping chown: changing ownership of '/bin/ping': Operation not permitted $ /sbin/getca

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 14:56 -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: > > > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user.  The ping > > > binary had the suid bit set.  Now I get: >

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:56:11PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: > >> On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > >> binary had the suid bit set. Now I ge

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 02:56:11PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: > How, just by executing dpkg-reconfigure, did I tell it this is what > I wanted? If that's the default, why wasn't it that way to begin with? AFAIK, the tar file format, on which the .deb package format is based, does not allow for

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Tue 07 Jun 2016 at 14:56:11 (-0800), Britton Kerin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: > >> On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > >> binary had the suid bit set. Now I get:

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: >> On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping >> binary had the suid bit set. Now I get: >> >> $ ping www.google.com >> ping: icmp open socket: Opera

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Le decadi 20 prairial, an CCXXIV, Reco a écrit : > Yes, and "aptitude search '~nping'" shows 41 result for me (42 actually > if you count busybox). > I'm somewhat lazy to test each and every implementation of ping to check > which one fails in 'icmp open socket' instead of 'sendmsg'. > > So, my po

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:29:52AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 19:26:04 (+0300), Reco wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:14:11AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:47:30 (+0300), Reco wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Santiago

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 14:04 -0500, David Wright pisze: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 19:50:55 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > > 1. Did You tried another kernel? If not, maybe try from backports for first. > > > > 2. iptable_filter 12488 0 > > > ip_tables 16975 1 iptabl

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 19:50:55 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > 1. Did You tried another kernel? If not, maybe try from backports for first. > > 2. iptable_filter 12488 0 > > ip_tables 16975 1 iptable_filter > > Little suspicious for me. What needs this modules when you ha

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 12:00 -0500, David Wright pisze: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:38:55 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > > Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 11:26 -0500, David Wright pisze: > > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:11:27 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > > > > Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o go

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:38:55 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 11:26 -0500, David Wright pisze: > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:11:27 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > > > Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 11:00 -0500, David Wright pisze: > > > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 15:

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 11:26 -0500, David Wright pisze: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:11:27 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > > Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 11:00 -0500, David Wright pisze: > > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 15:27:16 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 at 23:1

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 19:26:04 (+0300), Reco wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:14:11AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:47:30 (+0300), Reco wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Baku

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:11:27 (+0200), Norbert Kiszka wrote: > Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 11:00 -0500, David Wright pisze: > > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 15:27:16 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 at 23:15, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54A

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:14:11AM -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:47:30 (+0300), Reco wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Bakuwel wrote: > > > > Check your firewall rules. > > > > > > I

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 18:47:30 (+0300), Reco wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Bakuwel wrote: > > > Check your firewall rules. > > > > It can't be firewall rules. Try this to block outgoing ping: > > > > iptab

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 11:00 -0500, David Wright pisze: > On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 15:27:16 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 at 23:15, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Bakuwel wrote: > > > > Check your firewall rules. > > > > >

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon 06 Jun 2016 at 15:27:16 (+), Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 at 23:15, Santiago Vila wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Bakuwel wrote: > > > Check your firewall rules. > > > > It can't be firewall rules. Try this to block outgoing ping: > > > > iptable

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:27:16PM +, Mark Fletcher wrote: > you definitely can get this very error due to something to do with > the firewall, Well, you can get this very error if you follow the steps I explained here: https://lists.debian.org/msgid-search/20160602225359.gb11...@cantor.unex

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Hi. On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:57:47PM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Bakuwel wrote: > > Check your firewall rules. > > It can't be firewall rules. Try this to block outgoing ping: > > iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type echo-request -j REJ

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon, 6 Jun 2016 at 23:15, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Bakuwel wrote: > > Check your firewall rules. > > It can't be firewall rules. Try this to block outgoing ping: > > iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type echo-request -j REJECT > > then try to ping a

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 10:06:54AM +1200, Jan Bakuwel wrote: > Check your firewall rules. It can't be firewall rules. Try this to block outgoing ping: iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp --icmp-type echo-request -j REJECT then try to ping anywhere. You will get a different error message, namely "Destinat

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Dnia 2016-06-06, pon o godzinie 10:06 +1200, Jan Bakuwel pisze: > Hi Britton, > > On 03/06/16 09:56, Britton Kerin wrote: > > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > > binary had the suid bit set. Now I get: > > > > $ ping www.google.com > > ping: icmp open sock

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

Hi Britton, On 03/06/16 09:56, Britton Kerin wrote: > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > binary had the suid bit set. Now I get: > > $ ping www.google.com > ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted > 2 $ > > presumably because the bit isn't set.

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 at 06:56, Britton Kerin wrote: > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > binary had the suid bit set. Now I get: > > $ ping www.google.com > ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted > 2 $ > > presumably because the bit isn't set. >

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 11:28:40PM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > So far as I can see, ping IS executable by normal users. But then I have > only > got Wheezy and Jessie. Are you using Stretch or Sid?? This is not really new in stretch. You can experiment this funny effect in jessie as well. Try

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 01:56:08PM -0800, Britton Kerin wrote: > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > binary had the suid bit set. Now I get: > > $ ping www.google.com > ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted > 2 $ > > presumably because the bit

Re: make ping executable by normal users?

On Thursday 02 June 2016 22:56:08 Britton Kerin wrote: > On my old debian system I could ping as a normal user. The ping > binary had the suid bit set. Now I get: > > $ ping www.google.com > ping: icmp open socket: Operation not permitted > 2 $ > > presumably because the bit isn't set

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Wednesday 21 October 2015 14:03:34 Richard Owlett wrote: > 2. A. set system for autologin >       B. start browser, go to desired page >       C. save session in Xfce >       D. on next power up, system would go to desired page Just for the record, and not because I think taht it would be of an

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

It occurs to me that, if one really wants to keep a user from mucking with the rest of one's computer (e.g., in a kiosk mode) - one might consider booting into a hypervisor (e.g., virtualbox) which in turn boots a very restricted virtual machine, set to autostart a browser. Miles Fidelman Ric

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

Chris Bannister wrote: On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: On Monday 19 October 2015 04:55:46 Chris Bannister wrote: On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:21:53PM -0500, David Wright wrote: Ok, that's clarified, I think, what you mean by DE. You want (I'm guessing) a machine to c

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 08:20:05AM +0100, Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Monday 19 October 2015 04:55:46 Chris Bannister wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:21:53PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > > > > > Ok, that's clarified, I think, what you mean by DE. You want (I'm > > > guessing) a machine to come u

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Monday 19 October 2015 04:55:46 Chris Bannister wrote: > On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:21:53PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > > Quoting Richard Owlett (rowl...@cloud85.net): > > > I have 2 machines. > > > One is Squeeze with Gnome2 DE. > > > One is Jessie with Mate DE. > > > Desired user name to be "

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 05:21:53PM -0500, David Wright wrote: > Quoting Richard Owlett (rowl...@cloud85.net): > > I have 2 machines. > > One is Squeeze with Gnome2 DE. > > One is Jessie with Mate DE. > > Desired user name to be "myexperiments" having a minimal set [TBD] > > privileges. > > Power on

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Sunday 18 October 2015 23:21:53 David Wright wrote: > Ok, that's clarified, I think, what you mean by DE. You want (I'm > guessing) a machine to come up with its full Desktop Environment as if > the user "myexperiments" had sat at the console and typed in their > username and password. If Richa

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

Quoting Richard Owlett (rowl...@cloud85.net): > David Wright wrote: > >Quoting Richard Owlett (rowl...@cloud85.net): > >>David Wright wrote: > >>>[snip] > >>>Were I to set up a machine at home to autologin, I would not want it > >>>to login as me, nor root, nor anonymous. I would configure a user >

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Sun 18 Oct 2015 at 16:05:41 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > Brian wrote: > > > >Squeeze Gnome2 is probably using gdm. What is the output of > > > > apt-get purge gdm > > That command structure is either *MALICIOUS* or sign of terminal ignorance. > Reading http://manpages.debian.org/cgi-bin/ma

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

Brian wrote: On Sun 18 Oct 2015 at 08:10:54 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: David Wright wrote: r>>> I don't know. I don't really understand your original question. It said "How to do an autologin? In a DE independent way?" [snip] I have 2 machines. One is Squeeze with Gnome2 DE. One is Jessi

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Sun 18 Oct 2015 at 08:10:54 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > David Wright wrote: > > > >I don't know. I don't really understand your original question. It > said "How to do an autologin? In a DE independent way?" [snip] > > I have 2 machines. > One is Squeeze with Gnome2 DE. > One is Jessie with

Re: make system boot straight to browser connection

On Sunday 18 October 2015 14:10:54 Richard Owlett wrote: > David Wright wrote: > > Quoting Richard Owlett (rowl...@cloud85.net): > >> David Wright wrote: > >>> [snip] > >>> Were I to set up a machine at home to autologin, I would not want it > >>> to login as me, nor root, nor anonymous. I would co

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >